The following model allows the return to education to depend upon the total amount of both parents' education, called pareduc

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
The following model allows the return to education to depend upon the total amount of both parents'
education, called pareduc
log(wage) = Bo + B1educ + Bzeduc.pareduc + Bzexper + Batenure + u
%3D
the return to another year of education in this model is:
A log(wage)
3D В + Bzрareduc
Aeduc
(a) What sign do you expect for b2? Why?
After doing estimation we got following result:
(I)
log(wage) = 5.65 + .047 educ + .00078 educ-pareduc +
(.13) (.010)
(.00021)
.019 exper + .010 tenure
(.004)
(.003)
n = 722, R2 = .169.
(II) When pareduc is added as a separate variable to the equation, we get:
log(wage) = 4.94 + .097 educ + .033 pareduc - .0016 educ-pareduc
(.017)
(.38) (.027)
(.0012)
+ .020 exper + .010 tenure
(.004)
(.003)
n = 722, R² = .174.
Does the estimated return to education now depend positively on parent education? Test the null
hypothesis that the return to education does not depend on parent education. Should we keep or drop
pareduc in the model?
Transcribed Image Text:The following model allows the return to education to depend upon the total amount of both parents' education, called pareduc log(wage) = Bo + B1educ + Bzeduc.pareduc + Bzexper + Batenure + u %3D the return to another year of education in this model is: A log(wage) 3D В + Bzрareduc Aeduc (a) What sign do you expect for b2? Why? After doing estimation we got following result: (I) log(wage) = 5.65 + .047 educ + .00078 educ-pareduc + (.13) (.010) (.00021) .019 exper + .010 tenure (.004) (.003) n = 722, R2 = .169. (II) When pareduc is added as a separate variable to the equation, we get: log(wage) = 4.94 + .097 educ + .033 pareduc - .0016 educ-pareduc (.017) (.38) (.027) (.0012) + .020 exper + .010 tenure (.004) (.003) n = 722, R² = .174. Does the estimated return to education now depend positively on parent education? Test the null hypothesis that the return to education does not depend on parent education. Should we keep or drop pareduc in the model?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman