Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Business
Economics
The EPA proposes to cap emissions of ground-level ozone promoting emissions in both Illinois and Pennsylvania to no more than 6000 tons per year by 2026. While the rule proposes to require equal emissions from both states, it is particularly harsh on Pennsylvania, which currently emits 12,000 tons of ground-level ozone promoting pollutants, while Illinois only emits 8000 tons of these pollutants presently (Emissions data slightly changed to make your calculations easier.) This is to say that Pennsylvania will need to abate 6,000 tons of ground-level ozone-promoting compounds by 2026, while Illinois only has to abate 2,000 tons of these same pollutants. While the proposed rule caps emissions (at 6000 tons for each state), it does not include a provision that would allow there to be trades among states affected by the proposed rule Assume that, at present, neither Illinois nor Pennsylvania presently restrict any ozone-promoting emissions. Furthermore, assume that the marginal abatement cost functions associated with reducing ozone-promoting emissions for Illinois and Pennsylvania, are MAC(Illinois) = 1.5A(Illinois) MAC (Pennsylvania)=1.0 A(Pennsylvania) where A represents tons of VOC-promoting emissions abated by each state. 1. Absent any trading mechanism, what will be the cost to Pennsylvania of of complying with the proposed rule? (Do not use

The EPA proposes to cap emissions of ground-level ozone promoting emissions in both Illinois and Pennsylvania to no more than 6000 tons per year by 2026. While the rule proposes to require equal emissions from both states, it is particularly harsh on Pennsylvania, which currently emits 12,000 tons of ground-level ozone promoting pollutants, while Illinois only emits 8000 tons of these pollutants presently (Emissions data slightly changed to make your calculations easier.) This is to say that Pennsylvania will need to abate 6,000 tons of ground-level ozone-promoting compounds by 2026, while Illinois only has to abate 2,000 tons of these same pollutants. While the proposed rule caps emissions (at 6000 tons for each state), it does not include a provision that would allow there to be trades among states affected by the proposed rule Assume that, at present, neither Illinois nor Pennsylvania presently restrict any ozone-promoting emissions. Furthermore, assume that the marginal abatement cost functions associated with reducing ozone-promoting emissions for Illinois and Pennsylvania, are MAC(Illinois) = 1.5A(Illinois) MAC (Pennsylvania)=1.0 A(Pennsylvania) where A represents tons of VOC-promoting emissions abated by each state. 1. Absent any trading mechanism, what will be the cost to Pennsylvania of of complying with the proposed rule? (Do not use

Micro Economics For Today
Micro Economics For Today
10th Edition
ISBN:9781337613064
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.
Chapter14: Environmental Economics
Section14.2: Achieving Environmental Efficiency
Problem 2.2GE
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question

7

The EPA proposes to cap emissions of ground-level ozone promoting emissions in both Illinois and Pennsylvania to no more than 6000 tons per year by 2026. While the rule proposes to require equal emissions from both states, it is particularly harsh on Pennsylvania, which currently emits 12,000 tons of ground-level ozone promoting pollutants, while Illinois only emits 8000 tons of these pollutants presently. (Emissions data slightly changed to make your calculations easier.) This is to say that Pennsylvania will need to abate 6,000 tons of ground-level ozone-promoting compounds by 2026, while Illinois only has to abate 2,000 tons of these same pollutants. While the proposed rule caps emissions (at 6000 tons for each state), it does not include a provision that would allow there to be trades among states affected by the proposed rule. Assume that, at present, neither Illinois nor Pennsylvania presently restrict any ozone promoting emissions. Furthermore, assume that the marginal abatement cost functions associated with reducing ozone-promoting emissions for Illinois and Pennsylvania, are MAC(Illinois) = 1.5* A(Illinois) MAC(Pennsylvania) = 1.0 A(Pennsylvania) where A represents tons of VoC-promoting emissions abated by each state. 1. Absent any trading mechanism, what will be the cost to Pennsylvania of of complying with the proposed rule? (Do not use commas or dollar signs.) Answer
Transcribed Image Text:The EPA proposes to cap emissions of ground-level ozone promoting emissions in both Illinois and Pennsylvania to no more than 6000 tons per year by 2026. While the rule proposes to require equal emissions from both states, it is particularly harsh on Pennsylvania, which currently emits 12,000 tons of ground-level ozone promoting pollutants, while Illinois only emits 8000 tons of these pollutants presently. (Emissions data slightly changed to make your calculations easier.) This is to say that Pennsylvania will need to abate 6,000 tons of ground-level ozone-promoting compounds by 2026, while Illinois only has to abate 2,000 tons of these same pollutants. While the proposed rule caps emissions (at 6000 tons for each state), it does not include a provision that would allow there to be trades among states affected by the proposed rule. Assume that, at present, neither Illinois nor Pennsylvania presently restrict any ozone promoting emissions. Furthermore, assume that the marginal abatement cost functions associated with reducing ozone-promoting emissions for Illinois and Pennsylvania, are MAC(Illinois) = 1.5* A(Illinois) MAC(Pennsylvania) = 1.0 A(Pennsylvania) where A represents tons of VoC-promoting emissions abated by each state. 1. Absent any trading mechanism, what will be the cost to Pennsylvania of of complying with the proposed rule? (Do not use commas or dollar signs.) Answer
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 5 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Global Warming
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Micro Economics For Today
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613064
Author:
Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS