The elements of a valid contract is an offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to contract. An offer and acceptance equals an agreement. While consideration can be defined as something in the eyes of the law which can compensate or be adequate compensation for the promise to do an act. However, consideration is not an essential element in any contractual agreement. Parties to a contract simply have to establish an agreement and consideration can be ignored. Critically discuss. Requirements 1- An introduction and a conclusion. 2- A critical discussion on the concept of what are the elements of a valid consideration, inclusive of rules governing a valid consideration. Use landmark cases such as: Chappell and Co v Nestle Ltdjones vs padavattonstilk v myrickfisher vs bellhyde v wrenchhyde vs wrenchCurrie v Misa . Provide scholarly references

The elements of a valid contract is an offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to contract. An offer and acceptance equals an agreement. While consideration can be defined as something in the eyes of the law which can compensate or be adequate compensation for the promise to do an act. However, consideration is not an essential element in any contractual agreement. Parties to a contract simply have to establish an agreement and consideration can be ignored. Critically discuss. Requirements 1- An introduction and a conclusion. 2- A critical discussion on the concept of what are the elements of a valid consideration, inclusive of rules governing a valid consideration. Use landmark cases such as: Chappell and Co v Nestle Ltdjones vs padavattonstilk v myrickfisher vs bellhyde v wrenchhyde vs wrenchCurrie v Misa . Provide scholarly references

Similar questions

Which of the following is true of a severable contract? Multiple Choice It must be enforced or rejected in its entirety. It contains multiple parts that need to be performed collectively. It has both legal and illegal portions in the contract. It needs complete performance by both parties.
5. List the six (6) types of contracts that must be in writing.
A. Does a contract have to be in writing? B. List three types of terms in a contract. C. Distinguish terms in a contract from a representation.
Parties to a contract ('the Pre-existing Contract) may terminate the contract by entering a further contract, which discharges the Pre-existing Contract. Group of answer choices True False
A contract has become more difficult of performance due to some un-contemplated events or delays .The contract Question 11Answer a. becomes voidable. b. is discharged c. becomes void d. is not discharged
Sometimes an issur with a property is discovered during the pre-closing stage. Buyers may be willing to accept deficiencies if they an compensate through a price reduction. Which of the following is correct regarding adjusting a purchase price to offset a deflciency.Select one: O. The value of the price adjustment may become a matter of negotiations between the parties. O. A new agreement of purchase and sale must be drafted and signed to finalize the price adjustment. O. A formal appraisal is always required to determine the adjusted purchase price. O. Buyers are contractually obligated to negotiate an adjusted purchase price.
What is the test for whether a term is a condition? pick one answer from the following: The parties have described the term as a 'condition' or 'essential'. The promisee would not have entered the contract unless assured of strict or substantial performance of the relevant promise. Whether the term provides that performance of the contract is conditional on a contingency being fulfilled, such as finance being obtained, or development consent being granted. It was apparent to the promisor that the promisee would not have entered the contract unless assured of strict or substantial performance of the relevant promise.
explain the following terms in your own words and understanding and give specific examples. - Obligations - Contracts - Law - Quasi-Contracts - Quasi-Delicts
Why is past consideration no consideration at all? The adequacy of past consideration is difficult to determine. Past consideration is considered to be illusory. Past consideration may involve parties who are not involved in the current contract. Past consideration was provided before the current contract was made, and the current contract requires a benefit that has not yet been conferred.
A purchaser enters a contract to purchase land from a seller. The contract provides that the settlement date is 1 March but time is not of the essence. Is the following statement true or false? ‘The purchaser is not legally obligated to settle the transaction on 1 March.’ True or False?
Why is the performance of a pre-existing contractual obligation by the offeree not consideration for an offeror's promise? Give an example.