The data in the following were obtained from a digital thickness measuring gauge. The vall thickness (in inches) of an unidentified part is the data collected. Ten parts were elected randomly from a production lot. Three operators were selected from those who nomally use the same digital gauge. Each of the three operators measured the 10 parts hat were randomly ordered. The 10 parts were again randomly ordered and each of the hree operators again measured the parts. Assess this measurement system by assessing any significant differences in measurements via Operator, by part items, and the nteraction of operator and parts. Operator Part 1 3 1 0.953 0.952 0.954 0.954 0.954 0.956 2 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.957 0.958 0.957 3 0.956 0.955 0.956 0.955 0.957 0.956 4 0.957 0.957 0.958 0.957 0.957 0.958 0.957 0.957 0.957 0.957 0.958 0.958 0.958 0.958 0.957 0.957 0.958 0.958 7 0.957 0.956 0.958 0.957 0.958 0.957 8 0.957 0.955 0.957 0.956 0.957 0.957 9 0.954 0.954 0.954 0.954 0.955 0.955 10 0.954 0.955 0.956 0.954 0.954 0.955 What does the significance results in ANOVA mean for this experiment? If operators actor is significant, what does it mean for the inspection system? If interaction of parts and operators is significant, what does it imply about the reliability of the inspection process whose data was collected from? Can the same part be measured by one operator nd have consistent and reproducible result with another operator? Can you identify vhich operator is the best measurer? And which operator is least reliable?

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

hello! I need help with this problem. Thank you very much!

The data in the following were obtained from a digital thickness measuring gauge. The
wall thickness (in inches) of an unidentified part is the data collected. Ten parts were
selected randomly from a production lot. Three operators were selected from those who
nomally use the same digital gauge. Each of the three operators measured the 10 parts
that were randomly ordered. The 10 parts were again randomly ordered and each of the
three operators again measured the parts. Assess this measurement system by assessing
any significant differences in measurements via Operator, by part items, and the
interaction of operator and parts.
Operator
Part
1
2
3
1
0.953
0.952
0.954
0.954
0.954
0.956
0.956
0.956
0.956
0.957
0.958
0.957
0.956
0.955
0.956
0.955
0.957
0.956
4
0.957
0.957
0.958
0.957
0.957
0.958
0.957
0.957
0.957
0.957
0.958
0.958
6
0.958
0.958
0.957
0.957
0.958
0.958
7
0.957
0.956
0.958
0.957
0.958
0.957
8
0.957
0.955
0.957
0.956
0.957
0.957
0.954
0.954
0.954
0.954
0.955
0.955
10
0.954
0.955
0.956
0.954
0.954
0.955
What does the significance results in ANOVA mean for this experiment? If operators
factor is significant, what does it mean for the inspection system? If interaction of parts
and operators is significant, what does it imply about the reliability of the inspection
process whose data was collected from? Can the same part be measured by one operator
and have consistent and reproducible result with another operator? Can you identify
which operator is the best measurer? And which operator is least reliable?
Transcribed Image Text:The data in the following were obtained from a digital thickness measuring gauge. The wall thickness (in inches) of an unidentified part is the data collected. Ten parts were selected randomly from a production lot. Three operators were selected from those who nomally use the same digital gauge. Each of the three operators measured the 10 parts that were randomly ordered. The 10 parts were again randomly ordered and each of the three operators again measured the parts. Assess this measurement system by assessing any significant differences in measurements via Operator, by part items, and the interaction of operator and parts. Operator Part 1 2 3 1 0.953 0.952 0.954 0.954 0.954 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.956 0.957 0.958 0.957 0.956 0.955 0.956 0.955 0.957 0.956 4 0.957 0.957 0.958 0.957 0.957 0.958 0.957 0.957 0.957 0.957 0.958 0.958 6 0.958 0.958 0.957 0.957 0.958 0.958 7 0.957 0.956 0.958 0.957 0.958 0.957 8 0.957 0.955 0.957 0.956 0.957 0.957 0.954 0.954 0.954 0.954 0.955 0.955 10 0.954 0.955 0.956 0.954 0.954 0.955 What does the significance results in ANOVA mean for this experiment? If operators factor is significant, what does it mean for the inspection system? If interaction of parts and operators is significant, what does it imply about the reliability of the inspection process whose data was collected from? Can the same part be measured by one operator and have consistent and reproducible result with another operator? Can you identify which operator is the best measurer? And which operator is least reliable?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman