The average amount of time it takes for couples to further communicate with each other after their first date has ended is 2.76 days. Is this average longer for blind dates? A researcher interviewed 70 couples who had recently been on blind dates and found that they averaged 2.9 days to communicate with each other after the date was over. Their standard deviation was 0.846 days. What can be concluded at the the αα = 0.10 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer z-test for a population proportion t-test for a population mean The null and alternative hypotheses would be: H0:H0: ? μ p Select an answer < > = ≠ H1:H1: ? p μ Select an answer < ≠ = > The test statistic ? t z = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is ? ≤ > αα Based on this, we should Select an answer fail to reject accept reject the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The data suggest the populaton mean is significantly greater than 2.76 at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean time for couples who have been on a blind date to communicate with each other after the date is over is greater than 2.76. The data suggest the population mean is not significantly greater than 2.76 at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean time for couples who have been on a blind date to communicate with each other after the date is over is equal to 2.76. The data suggest that the population mean is not significantly greater than 2.76 at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population mean time for couples who have been on a blind date to communicate with each other after the date is over is greater than 2.76.
The average amount of time it takes for couples to further communicate with each other after their first date has ended is 2.76 days. Is this average longer for blind dates? A researcher interviewed 70 couples who had recently been on blind dates and found that they averaged 2.9 days to communicate with each other after the date was over. Their standard deviation was 0.846 days. What can be concluded at the the αα = 0.10 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer z-test for a population proportion t-test for a population mean The null and alternative hypotheses would be: H0:H0: ? μ p Select an answer < > = ≠ H1:H1: ? p μ Select an answer < ≠ = > The test statistic ? t z = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is ? ≤ > αα Based on this, we should Select an answer fail to reject accept reject the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The data suggest the populaton mean is significantly greater than 2.76 at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean time for couples who have been on a blind date to communicate with each other after the date is over is greater than 2.76. The data suggest the population mean is not significantly greater than 2.76 at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean time for couples who have been on a blind date to communicate with each other after the date is over is equal to 2.76. The data suggest that the population mean is not significantly greater than 2.76 at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population mean time for couples who have been on a blind date to communicate with each other after the date is over is greater than 2.76.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
The average amount of time it takes for couples to further communicate with each other after their first date has ended is 2.76 days. Is this average longer for blind dates? A researcher interviewed 70 couples who had recently been on blind dates and found that they averaged 2.9 days to communicate with each other after the date was over. Their standard deviation was 0.846 days. What can be concluded at the the αα = 0.10 level of significance?
- For this study, we should use Select an answer z-test for a population proportion t-test for a population
mean - The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
H0:H0: ? μ p Select an answer < > = ≠
H1:H1: ? p μ Select an answer < ≠ = >
- The test statistic ? t z = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
- The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
- The p-value is ? ≤ > αα
- Based on this, we should Select an answer fail to reject accept reject the null hypothesis.
- Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
- The data suggest the populaton mean is significantly greater than 2.76 at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean time for couples who have been on a blind date to communicate with each other after the date is over is greater than 2.76.
- The data suggest the population mean is not significantly greater than 2.76 at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean time for couples who have been on a blind date to communicate with each other after the date is over is equal to 2.76.
- The data suggest that the population mean is not significantly greater than 2.76 at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically insignificant evidence to conclude that the population mean time for couples who have been on a blind date to communicate with each other after the date is over is greater than 2.76.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman