The authors of the paper "Age and Violent Content Labels Make Video Games Forbidden Fruits for Youth"† carried out an experiment to determine if restrictive labels on video games actually increased the attractiveness of the game for young game players. Participants read a description of a new video game and were asked how much they wanted to play the game. The description also included an age rating. Some participants read the description with an age restrictive label of 7+, indicating that the game was not appropriate for children under the age of 7. Others read the same description, but with an age restrictive label of 12+, 16+, or 18+. The paper gave data for 12- to 13-year-old girls. Data consistent with summary values in the paper are shown below. 7+ label 12+ label 16+ label 18+ label 6 4 6 8 8 5 4 6 6 5 8 6 5 6 6 7 4 3 10 7 6 5 9 4 4 3 6 10 5 8 6 6 10 5 8 8 5 9 5 7 Do the data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels? Test the appropriate hypotheses using ? = 0.05. Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) F = Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) P-value = What can you conclude? Reject H0. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels.Reject H0. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels. Fail to reject H0. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels.Fail to reject H0. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels.

The authors of the paper "Age and Violent Content Labels Make Video Games Forbidden Fruits for Youth"† carried out an experiment to determine if restrictive labels on video games actually increased the attractiveness of the game for young game players. Participants read a description of a new video game and were asked how much they wanted to play the game. The description also included an age rating. Some participants read the description with an age restrictive label of 7+, indicating that the game was not appropriate for children under the age of 7. Others read the same description, but with an age restrictive label of 12+, 16+, or 18+. The paper gave data for 12- to 13-year-old girls. Data consistent with summary values in the paper are shown below. 7+ label 12+ label 16+ label 18+ label 6 4 6 8 8 5 4 6 6 5 8 6 5 6 6 7 4 3 10 7 6 5 9 4 4 3 6 10 5 8 6 6 10 5 8 8 5 9 5 7 Do the data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels? Test the appropriate hypotheses using ? = 0.05. Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) F = Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) P-value = What can you conclude? Reject H0. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels.Reject H0. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels. Fail to reject H0. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels.Fail to reject H0. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

The paper gave data for 12- to 13-year-old girls. Data consistent with summary values in the paper are shown below.

7+ label	12+ label	16+ label	18+ label
6	4	6	8
8	5	4	6
6	5	8	6
5	6	6	7
4	3	10	7
6	5	9	4
4	3	6	10
5	8	6	6
10	5	8	8
5	9	5	7

Do the data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels? Test the appropriate hypotheses using

? = 0.05.

Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)

F =

Use technology to find the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)

P-value =

What can you conclude?

Reject H₀. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels.Reject H₀. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels. Fail to reject H₀. The data do not provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels.Fail to reject H₀. The data provide convincing evidence that the mean rating associated with the game description for 12- to 13-year-old girls is not the same for all four age restrictive rating labels.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here