The accompanying data on degree of spirituality for a random sample of natural scientists and a random sample of social scientists working at research universities appeared in a paper. Is there evidence that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural and social scientists? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of ? = 0.01. Degree of Spirituality Very Moderate Slightly Not at All Natural Scientists 56 160 195 215 Social Scientists 56 220 244 239 State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. A) H0: The spirituality category proportions are the same for natural scientists and social scientists. Ha: The spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists. B) H0: The spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists. Ha: The spirituality category proportions are the same for natural scientists and social scientists. C) H0: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are not independent. Ha: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are independent. D)H0: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are independent. Ha: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are not independent. 2. Find the test statistic and P-value. Round your test statistic to three decimal places and your P-value to four decimal places.) 3. State the conclusion in the problem context. Fail to reject H0. There is not convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists. Reject H0. There is convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists. Fail to reject H0. There is convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists. Reject H0. There is not convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
The accompanying data on degree of spirituality for a random sample of natural scientists and a random sample of social scientists working at research universities appeared in a paper. Is there evidence that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural and social scientists? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of ? = 0.01. Degree of Spirituality Very Moderate Slightly Not at All Natural Scientists 56 160 195 215 Social Scientists 56 220 244 239 State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. A) H0: The spirituality category proportions are the same for natural scientists and social scientists. Ha: The spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists. B) H0: The spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists. Ha: The spirituality category proportions are the same for natural scientists and social scientists. C) H0: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are not independent. Ha: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are independent. D)H0: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are independent. Ha: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are not independent. 2. Find the test statistic and P-value. Round your test statistic to three decimal places and your P-value to four decimal places.) 3. State the conclusion in the problem context. Fail to reject H0. There is not convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists. Reject H0. There is convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists. Fail to reject H0. There is convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists. Reject H0. There is not convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
1. The accompanying data on degree of spirituality for a random sample of natural scientists and a random sample of social scientists working at research universities appeared in a paper. Is there evidence that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural and social scientists? Test the relevant hypotheses using a significance level of ? = 0.01.
Degree of Spirituality | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Very | Moderate | Slightly | Not at All | |
Natural Scientists | 56 | 160 | 195 | 215 |
Social Scientists | 56 | 220 | 244 | 239 |
State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses.
A) H0: The spirituality category proportions are the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
Ha: The spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
B) H0: The spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
Ha: The spirituality category proportions are the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
Ha: The spirituality category proportions are the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
C) H0: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are not independent.
Ha: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are independent.
Ha: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are independent.
D)H0: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are independent.
Ha: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are not independent.
Ha: Degree of spirituality and type of scientist are not independent.
2. Find the test statistic and P-value. Round your test statistic to three decimal places and your P-value to four decimal places.)
3. State the conclusion in the problem context.
Fail to reject H0. There is not convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
Reject H0. There is convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
Fail to reject H0. There is convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
Reject H0. There is not convincing evidence to conclude that the spirituality category proportions are not the same for natural scientists and social scientists.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman