Subjects with pre-existing cardiovascular symptoms who were receiving subitramine, an appetite suppressant, were foundto be at increased risk of cardiovascular events while taking the drug. The study included 9719 overweight or obesesubjects with preexisting cardiovascular disease and/ or type 2 diabetes. The subjects were randomly assigned tosubitramine (4787 subjects) or a placebo (4932 subjects) in a double-blind fashion. The primary outcome measured was theoccurrence of any of the following events: nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, orcardiovascular death. The primary outcome was observed in 557 subjects in the subitramine group and 505 subjects in theplacebo group.Do the data give good reason to think that there is a difference between the proportions of treatment and placebo subjectswho experienced the primary outcome?(a) State hypotheses, find the test statistic and use either software or Table A for the P-value. Give both the test statistic andthe P-value to three decimal places.Test statisticz =P-value =What is the conclusion found from the P-value? Select the correct explanation.O We have strong evidence that the proportion of subjects on sibutramine who are suffering a primary outcome differsfrom those who are on the placebo.We have no evidence that the proportion of subjects on sibutramine who are suffering a primary outcome differs fromthose who are on the placebo.We have very little evidence that the proportion of subjects on sibutramine who are suffering a primary outcomediffers from those who are on the placebo.O We are unable to come to a conclusion with the provided information.(b) Why was it important to have a placebo in this study? Select the correct explanation.A placebo should be used to blind patients to which group they are in and to account for any possible placebo effect.O Because the patients might have an extreme reaction to sibutramine usage.O None of the reasons are correct.O Because the P-value is small, there is a no difference in the proportion of primary outcomes between sibutramine andplacebo.O O O O

Name: Subjects with pre-existing cardiovascular symptoms who were receiving
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T07:06:16.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: Subjects with pre-existing cardiovascular symptoms who were receiving subitramine, an appetite suppressant, were foundto be at increased risk of cardiovascular events while taking the drug. The study included 9719 overweight or obesesubjects with pr

Given that,sample one, x1 =557, n1 =4787, p1= x1/n1=0.116sample two, x2 =505, n2 =4932, p2=…

Math

Statistics

Test statisticz = P-value = What is the conclusion found from the P-value? Select the correct explanation. We have strong evidence that the proportion of subjects on sibutramine who are suffering a primary outcome differs from those who are on the placebo. We have no evidence that the proportion of subjects on sibutramine who are suffering a primary outcome differs from those who are on the placebo. We have very little evidence that the proportion of subjects on sibutramine who are suffering a primary outcome differs from those who are on the placebo. We are unable to come to a conclusion with the provided information. (b) Why was it important to have a placebo in this study? Select the correct explanation. A placebo should be used to blind patients to which group they are in and to account for any possible placebo effect. Because the patients might have an extreme reaction to sibutramine usage. None of the reasons are correct. Because the P-value is small, there is a no difference in the proportion of primary outcomes between sibutramine and placcbo

Test statisticz = P-value = What is the conclusion found from the P-value? Select the correct explanation. We have strong evidence that the proportion of subjects on sibutramine who are suffering a primary outcome differs from those who are on the placebo. We have no evidence that the proportion of subjects on sibutramine who are suffering a primary outcome differs from those who are on the placebo. We have very little evidence that the proportion of subjects on sibutramine who are suffering a primary outcome differs from those who are on the placebo. We are unable to come to a conclusion with the provided information. (b) Why was it important to have a placebo in this study? Select the correct explanation. A placebo should be used to blind patients to which group they are in and to account for any possible placebo effect. Because the patients might have an extreme reaction to sibutramine usage. None of the reasons are correct. Because the P-value is small, there is a no difference in the proportion of primary outcomes between sibutramine and placcbo

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please answer these questions thanks
Individual actions can play a large role in the overall health of our planet. A researcher interested in evaluating environment friendly behaviors evaluated how often people recycle (per month) based on whether they have an overall optimistic or an overall pessimistic attitude toward eco-friendly behaviors. The results from this hypothetical study are given in the table. Test whether or not recycling behaviors differed between groups using a .05 level of significance. State the value of the test statistics and the decision to retain or reject the null hypothesis. Compute effect size using eta- squared (n^2). Pessimistic Optimistic 3 4 0 9 4 6 2 8 1 9 6 5 3 6 5 8 0 6 5 7
Acne is a common skin disease that affects most adolescents and can continue into adulthood. A study compared the effectiveness of three acne treatments and a placebo, all in gel form, applied twice daily for 12 weeks. The study's 517 teenage volunteers were randomly assigned to one of the four treatments. Success was assessed as clear or almost clear skin at the end of the 12 week period. The results of the study can be seen in the table below. Using the appropriate statistical test, determine if there is significant evidence that the four treatments perform differently. If so, how do they compare.
What conclusions can be drawn from a study with a “statistical significance” result? What information do you look at to evaluate whether an effect obtained in an experiment is large enough to have a “practical” or “clinical” significance?
A matched-subjects study and an independent-measures study both produced a t statistic with df = 10. How many individuals participated in each study? Can you explain this answer? I have asked twice and have gotten two wrong answers kindly help. Thank you!
Professor Chase from the University of Kansas has been working on a new cholesterol medication that is being called CholestoCleaner. The university is now conducting studies to determine if there is a possible side effect of sore joints. Placebo (Population Rate) To help determine the usual rate of sore joints, the research team gave a placebo (sugar pill) to 2017 subjects. Of those 2017 subjects, 4 of them developed sore joints. CholestoCleaner Trial The CholestoCleaner drug was given to 2622 subjects. Of those 2622 subjects, 19 of them developed sore joints. Preliminary Math If we consider the general population of people that don't use CholestoCleaner, what is the probability that they will develop sore joints? (Enter your answer as a fraction.) If you had a sample size of 2622 that did NOT use CholestoCleaner, how many would expect to develop sore joints? When 2622 subjects DID use the drug, there were 19 subjects that developed sore joints. Does it seem as though sore joints…
Which best illustrates the distinction between statistical significance and practical importance? Multiple Choice "This year, 360 of 440 statistics students at Oxnard Technical College rented their textbooks, compared with 110 of 330 students last year. This is a significant increase." "Our new manufacturing technique has increased the life of the 80 GB USB AsimoDrive external hard disk significantly, from 240,000 hours to 250,000 hours." "In 50,000 births, the new vaccine reduced the incidence of infant mortality in Morrovia significantly from 14.2 deaths per 1000 births to 10.3 deaths per 1000 births." "The new Sky Penetrator IV business jet’s cruising range has increased significantly from 3,975 miles to 4,000 miles."
How does increasing the alpha/significance level increase the power of a statistical test?
Identify the TEST for the below scenario and explain why you will choose the test for the analysis: In a hospital for one year the comorbidities of alcoholic and non-alcoholic patients were studied. Which test will be used to understand that alcoholic patients are more susceptible to comorbidities?
An article reports that blue eyed people earn less than brown eyed people. Average blue eyed salary, $35,000, average brown eyes $37,000, p-value 0.45. Based on that reported p-value and using the common definition of "statistical significance" which is the case?
Even if a treatment has no effect, it is still possible to obtain an extreme sample mean that is very different from the population mean. Which outcome is likely if this happens?