Take the fact-pattern of Palsgraf. Judge Cardozo found that the Railroad company should ot be liable to the plaintiff. Why not? Was there a problem in determining that they cause
Take the fact-pattern of Palsgraf. Judge Cardozo found that the Railroad company should ot be liable to the plaintiff. Why not? Was there a problem in determining that they cause
Related questions
Question
![Take the fact-pattern of Palsgraf. Judge Cardozo found that the Railroad company should
not be liable to the plaintiff. Why not? Was there a problem in determining that they caused
her damage (what sort of causation, if so)? Articulate the majority's reasoning from the
perspective of the Instrumentalist and from the perspective of the Corrective Justice
theorist. Which, if any, do you find more persuasive? Why?](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F43e5234f-f926-4bd8-baef-e8175c50855a%2F3c376833-b1c6-4fb2-8f96-bd35f6cac69e%2Fb17a8j_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Take the fact-pattern of Palsgraf. Judge Cardozo found that the Railroad company should
not be liable to the plaintiff. Why not? Was there a problem in determining that they caused
her damage (what sort of causation, if so)? Articulate the majority's reasoning from the
perspective of the Instrumentalist and from the perspective of the Corrective Justice
theorist. Which, if any, do you find more persuasive? Why?
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)