Take the fact-pattern of Palsgraf. Judge Cardozo found that the Railroad company should ot be liable to the plaintiff. Why not? Was there a problem in determining that they cause

icon
Related questions
Question
Take the fact-pattern of Palsgraf. Judge Cardozo found that the Railroad company should
not be liable to the plaintiff. Why not? Was there a problem in determining that they caused
her damage (what sort of causation, if so)? Articulate the majority's reasoning from the
perspective of the Instrumentalist and from the perspective of the Corrective Justice
theorist. Which, if any, do you find more persuasive? Why?
Transcribed Image Text:Take the fact-pattern of Palsgraf. Judge Cardozo found that the Railroad company should not be liable to the plaintiff. Why not? Was there a problem in determining that they caused her damage (what sort of causation, if so)? Articulate the majority's reasoning from the perspective of the Instrumentalist and from the perspective of the Corrective Justice theorist. Which, if any, do you find more persuasive? Why?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer