Suppose two firms (A and B) are competing in price. Each firm can charge either High or Low price and the payoffs (profit or loss) from these strategies are presented below: Firm B High 50, -40 10, 10 Low Firm A 0, 0 -40, 50 Low High a. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria b. If this game is played ten times by these two firms, find all pure strategy Nash equilibria c. Suppose this game is played infinitely and these firms agreed to charge high price in order to earn profits of Gh10 each but a firm will charge low price if its rival cheats. Find the a discount rate that will cause a firm to cheat d. Suppose the discount rate is 40% will the collusion strategies constitute a Nash Equilibrium

Suppose two firms (A and B) are competing in price. Each firm can charge either High or Low price and the payoffs (profit or loss) from these strategies are presented below: Firm B High 50, -40 10, 10 Low Firm A 0, 0 -40, 50 Low High a. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria b. If this game is played ten times by these two firms, find all pure strategy Nash equilibria c. Suppose this game is played infinitely and these firms agreed to charge high price in order to earn profits of Gh10 each but a firm will charge low price if its rival cheats. Find the a discount rate that will cause a firm to cheat d. Suppose the discount rate is 40% will the collusion strategies constitute a Nash Equilibrium

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following game matrix with two players- Player 1 and Player 2 with their respective strategies. Which of the following statements is correct such as x>y>b>a Players Player2 Player 1 A B C D (Y, Y) (b, x) (x, a) (AE) is the one of many Nash equilibria (C) is the unique Nash equilibria (C. D) is the unique Nash equilibria (A. E) and (B. F) are two Nash equilibria E (a, b) (x, y) (y, a) F (a,x) (a, b) (b, b)
Let's think about a traditional game theory principal agent game. In this game we have two players, Lauren and Jason Lauren will choose to invest $500 dollars with Jason If she doesn't invest the money, she keeps the $500 and Jason gets nothing If she does invest the money, then Jason has a choice-he can cooperate by investing Lauren's money and then splitting the profit of another $500. This would give Lauren $750 (her original $500 investment plus $250 of profit) and would give Jason $250. Jason's other choice is to appropriate, or to steal Lauren's money and not invest it. If he does this, Lauren ends up with nothing and Jason has the entire $500. The following diagram outlines this game. Principal Agent Game Jason (750.250) Invest appropriate 10. 500) doninve What will happen in this game? Lauren will not invest Lauren will invest and Jason will cooperate Lauren will invest and Jason will appropriate Next page
V4
Two firms are competing to establish one of two new wireless communication standards, A or B. A strategy is a choice of standard, and an outcome of this game is a choice of standard by each firm – for example, (A, B) represents the case where Firm 1 decides to develop standard A and Firm 2 develops standard B. Here, the first letter will always correspond to Firm 1’s decision, and the second letter to Firm 2’s decision. Firm 1 has the following preferences over outcomes, in order of highest to lowest preferred: it prefers (A, A) to (B, A) to (A, B) to (B, B). Firm 2 prefers (A, B) to (A, A) to (B, A) to (B, B). Suppose that firms simultaneously decide which standard to develop. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium? Is the answer (B,B)? If not please explian what is the answer?
Describe the game and find all Nash equilibria in the following situation: Each of two players chooses a non-negative number. In the choice (a1, a2), the payoff of the first player is equal to a1(a2 - a1), and the payoff of the second player is equal to a2(1 – a1 – a2).
3. The following is an interpretation of the rivalry between the United States (USA) and the Soviet Ünion (USSR) during the cold war. Each side has the choice of two strategies: Aggressive and Restrained. The payoff table is given as follows: USSR Restrained Aggressiveness Restrained 4,3 1,4 USA Aggressiveness 3,1 2,2 a) Consider this game when the two countries move simultaneously. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria. b) Next consider three alternative ways in which the game could be played with sequential moves: (i) The USA moves first and the USSR moves second. (i) the USSR moves first and the USA moves second. (i) The USSR moves first, and the USA moves second, but the USSR has a further move after the USA moves. For each case, draw the game tree and find the subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium. c) What are the key strategic issues (commitment, credibility and so on) for the two countries. (Note: Be concise. Your answer should not exceed 300 words].
Find the Nash equilibrium strategy and payoff in this simultaneous game. Show your work. Firms can collude (C) or not collude (NC) and their profits in millions are as follows. Please see attached.
Can a strategy be dominant for one player in a Nash equilibrium
Consider a sequential-move version of a rock-paper-scissor game. Players sequentially form one of three shapes with an outstretched hand. These shapes are "rock", "paper", and "scissors". A player playing rock will beat another player playing chosen scissors, but will lose to one playing paper; a play of paper will lose to a play of scissors. If both players choose the same shape, the game is tied. Suppose the winner receives a payoff of 1 and the loser receives the payoff of -1. Both players receive zero payoff under a tie. Suppose Player 1 moves first and Player 2 moves afterwards. In this game, what is the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium payoff of Player 1? 1 00 0-1
Consider the following game between Firm 1 and Firm 2: Firm 2 M R L -5, -5 4, 3 0, 0 -3, 3 4, 4 2, 2 М 3, 2 1, -3 Firm 1 -3, -1 R There is (are) Nash equilibrium (equilibria) when the firms move simultaneously, and SPNE(s) in the sequential-move game in which Firm 1 moves first.
Up Down Up Up Down Down Player 1 Player 2 In the game above, what is/are the EFFICIENT sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? (up,up) (up,down) (down, up) (down, down) No EFFICIENT equilibrium exists P1 gets $100 P2 gets $100 P1 gets $10 P2 gets $10 P1 gets $15 P2 gets $5 P1 gets $110 P2 gets $10
O Cell A O Cell C O Cell E O Cell I None of the above