Suppose the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to mandate that all methane emissions must be reduced to zero in order to alleviate globalwarming in the United States.Which of the following describes why most economists would disagree with this policy?O The opportunity cost of zero pollution is much higher than its benefit.O The environment isn't worth protecting.O Reducing methane emissions is desirable, but whatever levels of pollution firms decide to emit privately are already efficient.O Society would not benefit from lower air pollution.

Opportunity cost is giving up some benefits from the next best choice. It is a cost of the trade-off…

Suppose the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to mandate that all methane emissions must be reduced to zero in order to alleviate global warming in the United States. Which of the following describes why most economists would disagree with this policy? The opportunity cost of zero pollution is much higher than its benefit. O The environment isn't worth protecting. Reducing methane emissions is desirable, but whatever levels of pollution firms decide to emit privately are already efficient. O Society would not benefit from lower air pollution.

Suppose the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) wants to mandate that all methane emissions must be reduced to zero in order to alleviate global warming in the United States. Which of the following describes why most economists would disagree with this policy? The opportunity cost of zero pollution is much higher than its benefit. O The environment isn't worth protecting. Reducing methane emissions is desirable, but whatever levels of pollution firms decide to emit privately are already efficient. O Society would not benefit from lower air pollution.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

52
Im confused on this question.
2.Is the collection of emissions fees economically efficient in terms of cost effectiveness? How do manufacturers determine the amount of pollution reduction?
According to economists what is the optimal amount of pollution? O a. The optimal amount of pollution is where private costs equal social costs O b. Pollution should be reduced to a level as determined by government regulation O c. None, the goal is to completely eliminate pollution d. The point where the marginal benefit from further pollution reduction equals the marginal cost of further reduction
3. The effect of negative externalities on the optimal quantityof consumption Consider the market for pharmaceuticals. Suppose that a pharmaceutical factory dumps toxic waste into a nearby river, creating a negative externality for those living downstream from the factory. Producing additional pharmaceuticals imposes a constant per-unit external cost of $280. The following graph shows the demand (private value) curve and the supply (private cost) curve for pharmaceuticals. Use the purple points (diamond symbol) to plot the social cost curve when the external cost is $280 per unit. PRICE (Dollars per unit of pharmaceuticals) 800 720 640 560 480 400 320 240 160 80 O 1 2 3 □ O O ㅁ 4 Supply (Private Cost) Demand (Private Value) 5 6 7 QUANTITY (Units of pharmaceuticals) Social Cost ? The market equilibrium quantity is units of pharmaceuticals, but the socially optimal quantity of pharmaceuticals production is units. To create an incentive for the firm to produce the socially optimal…
Air pollution creates a negative externality—a cost suffered by a third party as a result of an economic transaction. A standard solution to a negative externality is a Pigouvian tax, a tax that raises the marginal private cost of pollution emissions to the level of the marginal social cost. The socially optimal quantity of pollution emissions is then determined by the intersection of the marginal private benefit, or demand, curve and the marginal social cost curve. The article notes that "putting a dollar value on the benefits of cleaner air has been difficult." Assuming this problem has been resolved, in the accompanying diagram, move the endpoints of line Smarginal social cost to show the marginal social cost curve. Then move the line labeled "Tax" to show the amount of the tax needed to limit emissions to the socially optimal level.
Q. 4
urco Use the chart below to answer the following question. The Socially Optimal Quantity of Pollution Select one: O a. $83 O b. $250 O c. $500 O d. $167 Marginal social cost, marginal social benefit $500 250 167 0 MSC MSB 83 125 Quantity of pollution The chart above shows the marginal social cost (MSC) and marginal social benefit (MSB) of pollution. Using the information provided in the figure, we can conclude the optimal Pigouvian tax per unit of pollution is:
Asap solve
Aiticle Link: https://bit.lv/3fbNtrFe The following graph represents the market for high-emissions cars. Answer this question assuming that the externality is not internalised. Price of high tmiiees vekides Secial Value Babetty high emistions vehiles What is the private value of the last unit traded (or the willingness to pay of the marginal buyer) in the market? P1 O P2 O P3 P4
5. Which of the following best describes the issuance of permits to pollute as a way of influencing the amount of pollution? Permits to pollute: a. encourage business to pollute.b. should be purchased by those whose pollution is the least expensive to eliminate.c. should be purchased by those whose pollution is the most expensive to eliminate.d. are preferable over taxes because they can be limited to exactly the efficient amount of pollution.
An increase in globalization has lead to an increase in pollution, and this is a problem because pollution is seen to be the classic example of a This is a that individuals impose on others but do not pay for. O negative externality, cost O possitive externality, benefit O negative externality, benefit O possitive externality, cost