Suppose that income causes health in the following specific manner: h = 2 + .25y and that health aids income as follows: y = 6 + 3h Based on this information, answer the following: a. Graph the two functions on the (y, h) graph and show the equilibrium (y on the x axis and h on they axis). b. Derive the equilibrium pair (y*, h*) and show on the graph above. 7 c . Now suppose that access to health is segmented by income in this country so that: h= 2 + .25y for all y < = 50 and h = 4 + .25y for all y > 50 Derive the new equilibrium and redraw the graphs again in the (y, h) space and depict the old and new equilibria.

Suppose that income causes health in the following specific manner: h = 2 + .25y and that health aids income as follows: y = 6 + 3h Based on this information, answer the following: a. Graph the two functions on the (y, h) graph and show the equilibrium (y on the x axis and h on they axis). b. Derive the equilibrium pair (y, h) and show on the graph above. 7 c . Now suppose that access to health is segmented by income in this country so that: h= 2 + .25y for all y < = 50 and h = 4 + .25y for all y > 50 Derive the new equilibrium and redraw the graphs again in the (y, h) space and depict the old and new equilibria.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please help
Can you please help awnser 8 d I have attached awnser to 8 a to make it easier to understand and complete. Thank you
Finn is in charge of decorations for an upcoming festival, and he is planning to decorate withclovers (C) and flags (F). Suppose his preferences over decorations can be represented by theutility function U(C, F) = C^(3/4)F^(1/4) For this problem, assume C and F are infinitely divisible so you don’t need to worry aboutrestricting to whole-number answers.(a) Write Finn’s budget constraint as a function of the prices PC, PF , and his budget I.(b) Write Finn’s constrained optimization problem in Lagrangian form and derive the threefirst order conditions.(c) Use two of the first order conditions to show that Finn’s marginal rate of substitution(MRS) equals the marginal rate of transformation (MRT) at the optimum. (Note: Youdo not need to solve the constrained optimization any more than this.)
Suppose Bill is on a low-carbohydrate diet. He can eat only three foods: Rice Krispies, cottage cheese, and popcorn. The marginal utilities for each food are tabulated below. Bill is allowed only 167 grams of carbohydrates daily. Rice Krispies, cottage cheese, and popcorn provide 25, 6, and 10 grams of carbohydrates per cup, respectively. Referring to the accompanying table, respond to the following questions: Please check the image provided for the table.
Because Income depends on work effort and work effort depends on nutrition, suppose the relationship between income (Y) and total food availability (F) in a poor household is given by: Y = 10F + 20F2 – 0.6F3 a) If food availability in a two-person household is 20, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain. b) If food availability in a two-person household is 30, would it be “rational” to share the food? Explain.
Question 3 A certain household comprises of a couple, Adam (A) and Betty (B). They have lexicographic preferences over two goods G1 and G2 - A wants to consume as much of G1 as possible, before moving on to G2 whereas, for B, it is the opposite, she wants to consume as much of G2 as possible before moving on to G1.¹ Given their varying preferences, they decide to shop separately, after dividing the household income equally. The household income is $8. One difference to the usual setting - there are government restrictions in place so that no individual is allowed to buy more than two units of either good. Hint: Do not use mathematical brute force (like Calculus) to solve this problem. A simple diagram with appropriate budget lines, etc. should suffice. 1) Suppose prices are p= (P₁, P2) = (1,2). Denote the optimal choice of A and B as a= b= (b₁,b₂) respectively. Solve for a and b. (a1, a2) and
"The diagram reveals that X2>X1. This indicates that consumption of X rose as X's price went up." --> Can you explain, because I thought the law of the demand has an inverse relationship?
Given: Budget constraint: 1600 = 160*HI + 20*GUtility function: U=HI*G where MRS = -G/HI Consider someone who has an optimal bundle of health insurance (Hi) of 5 and other goods (G) of 40 (Hi = 5, G = 40). Assume that this individual prefers to optimally purchase no health insurance (Hi). On a graph, draw the budget constraint offered above and include the indifference curve for a person who optimally chooses to be uninsured.