Suppose that 10% of the fields in a given agricultural area are infested with the sweet potato whitefly. One hundred fields in this area are randomly selected, and 40 are found to be infested with whitefly. A USE SALT (a) Assuming that the experiment satisfies the conditions of the binomial experiment, do the data indicate that the proportion of infested fields is greater than expected? Use the p-value approach, and test using a 5% significance level. State the null and alternative hypotheses. O Hoi p< 0.1 versus H: p > 0.1 O Ho: P = 0.1 versus H: p> 0.1 O Ho: P = 0.1 versus H: p < 0.1 O Ho: p = 0.1 versus H: p = 0.1 O Ho: p = 0.1 versus H: p = 0.1 Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value = State your conclusion. O Since the p-value is less than 0.05, H, is not rejected. There is sufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected. O Since the p-value is less than 0.05, H, is rejected. There is sufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected. O Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, Ho is rejected. There insufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields larger than expected. O Ssince the p-value is greater than 0.05, Ho is not rejected. There is insufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected. (b) If the proportion of infested fields found to be significantly greater than 0.10, why is this of practical significance to the researcher? What practical conclusions might she draw from the results? O The agronomist may determine that because the proportion of infested fields was not unusual, no action needs to be taken. O The agronomist may determine that because the proportion of infested fields was not unusual, the sampling method was not random. O The agronomist may determine that an unusually high proportion of infested fields indicates a contagious disease. O The agronomist may determine that an unusually low proportion of infested fields might indicate contagious disease. O The agronomist may determine that because the proportion of infested fields was unusual, no action needs to be taken.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
Suppose that 10% of the fields in a given agricultural area are infested with the sweet potato whitefly. One hundred fields in this area are randomly selected, and 40 are found to be infested with whitefly.
n USE SALT
(a) Assuming that the experiment satisfies the conditions of the binomial experiment, do the data indicate that the proportion of infested fields is greater than expected? Use the p-value approach, and test using a 5% significance level.
State the null and alternative hypotheses.
О на: р<0.1 versus H: p> 0.1
O Ho: p = 0.1 versus H: p > 0.1
О на: р3D 0.1 versus H: p < 0.1
O Ho: p + 0.1 versus H,: p = 0.1
O Ho: p = 0.1 versus H: p + 0.1
Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)
p-value =
State your conclusion.
O Since the p-value is less than 0.05, H is not rejected. There is sufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected.
O Since the p-value is less than 0.05, H, is rejected. There is sufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected.
O Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, H, is rejected. There is insufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected.
O Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, H, is not rejected. There is insufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected.
(b) If the proportion of infested fields is found to be significantly greater than 0.10, why is this of practical significance to the researcher? What practical conclusions might she draw from the results?
O The agronomist may determine that because the proportion of infested fields was not unusual, no action needs to be taken.
O The agronomist may determine that because the proportion of infested fields was not unusual, the sampling method was not random.
O The agronomist may determine that an unusually high proportion of infested fields indicates a contagious disease.
O The agronomist may determine that an unusually low proportion of infested fields might indicate a contagious disease.
O The agronomist may determine that because the proportion of infested fields was unusual, no action needs to be taken.
Transcribed Image Text:Suppose that 10% of the fields in a given agricultural area are infested with the sweet potato whitefly. One hundred fields in this area are randomly selected, and 40 are found to be infested with whitefly. n USE SALT (a) Assuming that the experiment satisfies the conditions of the binomial experiment, do the data indicate that the proportion of infested fields is greater than expected? Use the p-value approach, and test using a 5% significance level. State the null and alternative hypotheses. О на: р<0.1 versus H: p> 0.1 O Ho: p = 0.1 versus H: p > 0.1 О на: р3D 0.1 versus H: p < 0.1 O Ho: p + 0.1 versus H,: p = 0.1 O Ho: p = 0.1 versus H: p + 0.1 Find the p-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) p-value = State your conclusion. O Since the p-value is less than 0.05, H is not rejected. There is sufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected. O Since the p-value is less than 0.05, H, is rejected. There is sufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected. O Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, H, is rejected. There is insufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected. O Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, H, is not rejected. There is insufficient evidence to indicate that the proportion of infested fields is larger than expected. (b) If the proportion of infested fields is found to be significantly greater than 0.10, why is this of practical significance to the researcher? What practical conclusions might she draw from the results? O The agronomist may determine that because the proportion of infested fields was not unusual, no action needs to be taken. O The agronomist may determine that because the proportion of infested fields was not unusual, the sampling method was not random. O The agronomist may determine that an unusually high proportion of infested fields indicates a contagious disease. O The agronomist may determine that an unusually low proportion of infested fields might indicate a contagious disease. O The agronomist may determine that because the proportion of infested fields was unusual, no action needs to be taken.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Point Estimation, Limit Theorems, Approximations, and Bounds
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman