Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
Some have argued that throwing darts at the stock pages to decide which companies to invest in could be a successful stock-picking strategy. Suppose a researcher decides to test this theory and randomly chooses 300 companies to invest n. After 1 year, 156 of the companies were considered winners; that is, they outperformed other companies in the same investment class. To assess whether the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners, the researcher tested H o= 0.5 versus H,: p> 0.5 and obtained a P-value of 0.2442. Explain what this P-value means and write a conclusion for the researcher. (Assume a is 0.1 or less.) Choose the correct explanation below. O A. About 156 in 300 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is greater than 0.5. O B. About 24 in 100 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is greater than 0.5. OC. About 24 in 100 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is 0.5. O D. About 156 in 300 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is 0.5. Choose the correct conclusion below. O A. Because the P-value is small, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. O B. Because the P-value is large, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. OC. Because the P-value is large, reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. O D. Because the P-value is small, reject the null hypothesis. There s sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners.

Some have argued that throwing darts at the stock pages to decide which companies to invest in could be a successful stock-picking strategy. Suppose a researcher decides to test this theory and randomly chooses 300 companies to invest n. After 1 year, 156 of the companies were considered winners; that is, they outperformed other companies in the same investment class. To assess whether the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners, the researcher tested H o= 0.5 versus H,: p> 0.5 and obtained a P-value of 0.2442. Explain what this P-value means and write a conclusion for the researcher. (Assume a is 0.1 or less.) Choose the correct explanation below. O A. About 156 in 300 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is greater than 0.5. O B. About 24 in 100 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is greater than 0.5. OC. About 24 in 100 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is 0.5. O D. About 156 in 300 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is 0.5. Choose the correct conclusion below. O A. Because the P-value is small, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. O B. Because the P-value is large, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. OC. Because the P-value is large, reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. O D. Because the P-value is small, reject the null hypothesis. There s sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
Some have argued that throwing darts at the stock pages to decide which companies to invest in could be a successful stock-picking strategy. Suppose a researcher decides to test this theory and randomly chooses 300 companies to invest in. After 1 year, 156 of the companies were considered winners; that is, they outperformed other companies in the same investment class. To assess whether the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners, the researcher tested H,: p= 0.5 versus H,: p> 0.5 and obtained a P-value of 0.2442. Explain what this P-value means and write a conclusion for the researcher. (Assume a is 0.1 or less.) Choose the correct explanation below. O A. About 156 in 300 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is greater than 0.5. O B. About 24 in 100 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is greater than 0.5. OC. About 24 in 100 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is 0.5. O D. About 156 in 300 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is 0.5. Choose the correct conclusion below. O A. Because the P-value is small, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. O B. Because the P-value is large, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. OC. Because the P-value is large, reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. O D. Because the P-value is small, reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners.
Transcribed Image Text:Some have argued that throwing darts at the stock pages to decide which companies to invest in could be a successful stock-picking strategy. Suppose a researcher decides to test this theory and randomly chooses 300 companies to invest in. After 1 year, 156 of the companies were considered winners; that is, they outperformed other companies in the same investment class. To assess whether the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners, the researcher tested H,: p= 0.5 versus H,: p> 0.5 and obtained a P-value of 0.2442. Explain what this P-value means and write a conclusion for the researcher. (Assume a is 0.1 or less.) Choose the correct explanation below. O A. About 156 in 300 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is greater than 0.5. O B. About 24 in 100 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is greater than 0.5. OC. About 24 in 100 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is 0.5. O D. About 156 in 300 samples will give a sample proportion as high or higher than the one obtained if the population proportion really is 0.5. Choose the correct conclusion below. O A. Because the P-value is small, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. O B. Because the P-value is large, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. OC. Because the P-value is large, reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. O D. Because the P-value is small, reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS