Some economies are less healthy than they could be because both the market power and economic profit of some favored firms are protected by either government or some private force (e.g. mafia). Present a firm that has market power and is earning economic profit when it is maximizing profit. Explain how competition could help consumers by showing how the profit maximizing point for this firm might change, to the advantage of consumers, if competitors entered this market and competed against this firm.

Some economies are less healthy than they could be because both the market power and economic profit of some favored firms are protected by either government or some private force (e.g. mafia). Present a firm that has market power and is earning economic profit when it is maximizing profit. Explain how competition could help consumers by showing how the profit maximizing point for this firm might change, to the advantage of consumers, if competitors entered this market and competed against this firm.

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter9: Market Structure And Long-run Equilibrium

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The auto industry in the U.S. has long been dominated by the Big Three carmakers: Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. The auto industry in China, on the other hand, has more than 170 carmakers. Automakers in the U.S. have some monopoly power while the car market in China has the characteristics of a perfectly competitive market. Based on these differences in market characteristics, explain how car makers in the U.S. will “behave” compared to carmakers in China. In particular, address the following considerations: How will carmakers in the U.S. respond to consumers’ desires compared to Chinese carmakers’ response to consumers’ desires, everything else being equal?
The auto industry in the U.S. has long been dominated by the Big Three carmakers: Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. The auto industry in China, on the other hand, has more than 170 carmakers. Automakers in the U.S. have some monopoly power while the car market in China has the characteristics of a perfectly competitive market. Based on these differences in market characteristics, explain how car makers in the U.S. will “behave” compared to carmakers in China. In particular, address the following considerations: How will the price of cars in the U.S. compare to the price of cars in China, everything else being equal?
The auto industry in the U.S. has long been dominated by the Big Three carmakers: Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler. The auto industry in China, on the other hand, has more than 170 carmakers. Automakers in the U.S. have some monopoly power while the car market in China has the characteristics of a perfectly competitive market. Based on these differences in market characteristics, explain how car makers in the U.S. will “behave” compared to carmakers in China. In particular, address the following considerations: How will the profits of carmakers in the U.S. compare to the profits of carmakers in China, everything else being equal?
A free market is one where decisions regarding what and how much to produce are made by the market itself. This market is made up of buyers and sellers negotiating prices for goods and services. It is generally accepted that there are four degrees of competition within a free-market system. These include perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly. One benefit of the free market is that it allows open competition among companies. Businesses must provide customers with high-quality products at fair prices with good service. If they don't, they lose customers to businesses that do. Select the degree of competition that best describes each listed industry or business based on the description.
Competition and the Invisible Hand: End of Chapter Problem Let’s take a look at Invisible Hand Property 2 in action using a mathematical example. Suppose an industry is characterized by the following equations. We’re going to assume that all individual firms are identical to make this problem a little simpler. Demand: ??=100−2?QD=100−2⁢P Individual firm's supply: ??=0.5+0.1?qS=0.5+0.1⁢P Market supply with n firms: ??=?×??=0.5?+0.1??QS=n×qS=0.5⁢n+0.1⁢n⁢P Individual firm's average cost: ??=5??−5+24.2??A⁢C=5⁢qS−5+24.2qS a. Suppose 24 firms are in this industry. What is the equation for market supply? QS =
These two cases provide examples of markets that are characterized neither as perfect competition nor monopoly. Instead, these firms are competing in market structures that lie between the extremes of monopoly and perfect competition. How do they behave? Why do they exist?
Allocative efficiency is an economic concept regarding efficiency at the social or societal level. It refers to producing the optimal quantity of some output, the quantity where the marginal benefit to society of one more unit just equals the marginal cost. The rule of profit maximization in a world of perfect competition was for each firm to produce the quantity of output where P = MC, where the price (P) is a measure of how much buyers value the good and the marginal cost (MC) is a measure of what marginal units cost society to produce. A monopolist... Group of answer choices Would try to achieve allocative efficiency to compete with the other firms who own a larger market share. Will prefer to operate where price < average total cost. Has no motivation to operate at an output level where P=MC, once a barrier is in place and no longer has to worry about competition. Will experience greater profits if it sets prices equal to average total cost.
Monopoly outcome versus perfectly competitive outcome Consider the daily market for hot dogs in a small city. Suppose that this market is in long-run perfectly competitive equilibrium, with many hot dog stands in the city, each one selling the same kind of hot dogs. Therefore, each vendor is a price taker and possesses no market power. The following graph shows the demand (D) and supply curves (S = MC) in the market for hot dogs. Place the black point (plus symbol) on the graph to indicate the market price and quantity that will result from perfect competition. Use the green point (triangle symbol) to shade the area that represents consumers’ surplus, and use the purple point (diamond symbol) to shade the area that represents producers’ surplus. (graph 1) Assume that one of the hot dog vendors successfully lobbies the city council to obtain the exclusive right to sell hot dogs within the city limits. This firm buys up all the rest of the hot dog vendors in the city and…
Limiting Market Power: Regulation and Anti-Trust Predatory pricing threatens to keep competitors out of the market. It is a price that is so low that it will be profitable for the firm that adopts it only if a rival is driven out of the market. Debate why predatory pricing is an economic inefficiency in a perfectly competitive.
Since you know all about perfect competition, monopoly, and oligopoly, we can find out how various types of firms might feel about uncertainty concerning the prices of its factors of production and output. Consider a profit-maximizing firm that produces a single good from several factors. The firm is characterized by a production function y = f(x1, ... , Xn), where y is the level of output obtainable from factor inputs x1, ... , Xn. We will use p to denote the price of the output good, and Wi to denote the price of factor input i. When there is uncertainty a priori about these prices, the firm is allowed to choose its production plan after any uncertainty in prices resolves. (c) Finally, consider this question in the context of a von Stackelberg duopoly. Two firms produce an undifferentiated commodity for which demand is given by P = A - X, where P is price and X is total supply. Demand-is unchanging. Each firm has production technology with a fixed cost F for producing anything at…
The figure shows the market demand curve for penicillin, an antibiotic medicine. Initially, the market was supplied by perfectly competitive firms Later, the government granted the exclusive right to produce and sell penicillin to one firm. The figure also shows the marginal revenue curve (MR) of the firm once it begins to operate as a monopoly. The marginal cost is constant at $3, irrespective of the market structure What is the surplus enjoyed by the firm when it is the sole supplier of the medicine? OA. 590 OB. $180 OC. $30 OD. $60 Price/Cost (5) 10 1 10 20 30 40 MR Demand 50 60 70 80 90 Quantity (units)
Consider a market of 6 firms that compete through production. Demand is given as P = 220 – 2Q. Each firm has a marginal cost of $20. a. What will be the equilibrium firm quantities, market price, and firm profits? b. Suppose two firms merge in this market to become a leader. What will be the new equilibrium firm quantities, market price, and firm profits? Was it profitable for the firms to merge into a leader? Note that n = 5 after the merger. c. Suppose another two firms merge to form a second leader in the market. What will be the new equilibrium firm quantities, market price, and firm profits? Was it profitable for the followers to merge into a co-leader? Note that n = 4 and L = 2 after the merger: