ses/71392/assignments/1180548?module_item_id=5046108 Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south different from the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 438 of the 598 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 389 of the 510 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.05 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer v Select an answer v Select an answer v (please enter a decimal) Hj: Select an answer v Select an answer v Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? v is -1.156. Enter it here (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value is 0.2478. Enter it here (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ? a f. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.05, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different from the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different from the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.05 so thero ic cu that th
ses/71392/assignments/1180548?module_item_id=5046108 Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south different from the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 438 of the 598 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 389 of the 510 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.05 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer v Select an answer v Select an answer v (please enter a decimal) Hj: Select an answer v Select an answer v Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? v is -1.156. Enter it here (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value is 0.2478. Enter it here (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ? a f. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.05, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different from the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different from the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.05, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.05 so thero ic cu that th
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question

Transcribed Image Text:ses/71392/assignments/1180548?module_item_id=5046108
Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south different from the proportion of wildfires
caused by humans in the west? 438 of the 598 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were
caused by humans while 389 of the 510 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by
humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.05 level of significance?
a. For this study, we should use Select an answer
b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
Ho: Select an answer v
Select an answer v
Select an answer v (please enter a decimal)
Hj: Select an answer v
Select an answer v
Select an answer v (Please enter a decimal)
c. The test statistic ? v is -1.156. Enter it here
(please show your answer to 3 decimal
places.)
d. The p-value is 0.2478. Enter it here
lease show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
e. The p-value is ? a
f. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.
g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.05, so there is insufficient evidence to
conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different
from the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is different from the
population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.05, so there is statistically significant
evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the
south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.
O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.05, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude
that the proportion of the 598 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is diff ent
from the proportion of the 510 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.
OGO/
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 8 steps with 1 images

Recommended textbooks for you

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON

The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman

Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman