Science Toolkit The Guilty Dentist W hile biologists use the study of evolutionary relationships mainly to build evolutionary trees of the world's organisms, scientists are finding wider and wider uses for evolutionary trees. Scientists have even used evolutionary trees to solve the mystery of whether a dentist infected his patients with HIV, the virus that causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in humans. The dentist, who was himself infected with HIV, had been working, as usual, with his patients. Then some of his patients began turning up HIV- positive. Against a backdrop of increasing public controversy over whether health care workers with HIV pose a risk to their patients, many people wanted to know: had this dentist transmitted the deadly virus to his patients? Adding confusion to the situation was the fact that some of the infected patients had lifestyles or habits that put them at risk for HIV infection by other means. Those on both sides of the issue- some saying the dentist should not be blamed, others saying he was a threat-argued heatedly without resolution. In order to answer the question, researchers took advantage of the observation that HIV's genetic material, like that of most viruses, evolves quickly, resulting in many different but closely related strains of HIV. The researchers created an evolutionary tree of the viral strains found in the dentist, in each of the infected patients, and in local people who were also infected with HIV but were not patients of the dentist. If the dentist had infected his patients, then the strains of HIV found in his patients should be more closely related to his strain and less closely related to the strains from other infected people. The results showed that some of the dentist's patients probably were infected by him and that some probably were not. Two patients, X and Y, who could have been exposed to HIV as a result of their lifestyles or habits, had HIV strains that were not closely related to the dentist's strain. However, five other patients-A, B, C, D, and E-were carrying strains of the virus very closely related to the strain in the dentist. Moreover, those people were not at risk of contracting HIV by other means. So the scientists concluded that, at least in the case of these five patients, the dentist had infected them with his strain of the virus. African Patient Patient person Local non- patient 1 Local non- patient 2 "P Y Local non- Local non- patient 3 patient 4 Patient Patient Patient Dentist Patient Patient D An Evolutionary Tree Solves the Whodunit By examining the evolutionary relationships among the strains of HIV found in a number of infected people, including a dentist and his infected patients, researchers were able to solve the mystery of how his patients were likely to have been infected.
Science Toolkit The Guilty Dentist W hile biologists use the study of evolutionary relationships mainly to build evolutionary trees of the world's organisms, scientists are finding wider and wider uses for evolutionary trees. Scientists have even used evolutionary trees to solve the mystery of whether a dentist infected his patients with HIV, the virus that causes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in humans. The dentist, who was himself infected with HIV, had been working, as usual, with his patients. Then some of his patients began turning up HIV- positive. Against a backdrop of increasing public controversy over whether health care workers with HIV pose a risk to their patients, many people wanted to know: had this dentist transmitted the deadly virus to his patients? Adding confusion to the situation was the fact that some of the infected patients had lifestyles or habits that put them at risk for HIV infection by other means. Those on both sides of the issue- some saying the dentist should not be blamed, others saying he was a threat-argued heatedly without resolution. In order to answer the question, researchers took advantage of the observation that HIV's genetic material, like that of most viruses, evolves quickly, resulting in many different but closely related strains of HIV. The researchers created an evolutionary tree of the viral strains found in the dentist, in each of the infected patients, and in local people who were also infected with HIV but were not patients of the dentist. If the dentist had infected his patients, then the strains of HIV found in his patients should be more closely related to his strain and less closely related to the strains from other infected people. The results showed that some of the dentist's patients probably were infected by him and that some probably were not. Two patients, X and Y, who could have been exposed to HIV as a result of their lifestyles or habits, had HIV strains that were not closely related to the dentist's strain. However, five other patients-A, B, C, D, and E-were carrying strains of the virus very closely related to the strain in the dentist. Moreover, those people were not at risk of contracting HIV by other means. So the scientists concluded that, at least in the case of these five patients, the dentist had infected them with his strain of the virus. African Patient Patient person Local non- patient 1 Local non- patient 2 "P Y Local non- Local non- patient 3 patient 4 Patient Patient Patient Dentist Patient Patient D An Evolutionary Tree Solves the Whodunit By examining the evolutionary relationships among the strains of HIV found in a number of infected people, including a dentist and his infected patients, researchers were able to solve the mystery of how his patients were likely to have been infected.
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
11th Edition
ISBN:9780134580999
Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Chapter1: The Human Body: An Orientation
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: The correct sequence of levels forming the structural hierarchy is A. (a) organ, organ system,...
Related questions
Question
Read the Guilty dentist information. Then use your understanding to answer the following question:
What was the observation based on the information?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780134580999
Author:
Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:
PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:
9781947172517
Author:
Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:
OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781259398629
Author:
McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:
Mcgraw Hill Education,
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780134580999
Author:
Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:
PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:
9781947172517
Author:
Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:
OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781259398629
Author:
McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:
Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780815344322
Author:
Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781260159363
Author:
Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9781260231700
Author:
Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht
Publisher:
McGraw Hill Education