Say that Alland can produce 24 units of food per person per year or 6 units of clothing per person per year, but Georgeland can produce 36 units of food per year or 6 units of clothing. Which of the following is true? Georgeland has a comparative advantage, but not an absolute advantage, in producing food. Georgeland has both a comparative and absolute advantage in producing food. Alland has both absolute advantage and comparative advantage, in producing food.

Say that Alland can produce 24 units of food per person per year or 6 units of clothing per person per year, but Georgeland can produce 36 units of food per year or 6 units of clothing. Which of the following is true? Georgeland has a comparative advantage, but not an absolute advantage, in producing food. Georgeland has both a comparative and absolute advantage in producing food. Alland has both absolute advantage and comparative advantage, in producing food.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

from the image, can you help answer whether the trade action for Felicidad: jeans is import 18 or export 18, Felicidad: corn import 54 or export 54, and Contente: jeans import 18 or export 18 and Contente: corn import 54 or export 54.
Suppose that France and Germany both produce wine and cheese. The table below shows combinations of the goods that each country can produce in a day. France Germany Wine (Bottles) Cheese (Pounds) 16 Wine (Bottles) Cheese (Pounds) 12 8. 4. 25 20 15 2 3 3 4 10 4 Who has the comparative advantage in producing wine and who has the comparative advantage in producing cheese? O A. France has a comparative advantage producing wine and Germany has a comparative advantage producing cheese. O B. France has a comparative advantage producing wine and cheese. OC. Germany has a comparative advantage producing wine and cheese. -OD. Neither has a comparative advantage producing wine or cheese. OE. France has a comparative advantage producing cheese and Germany has a comparative advantage producing wine. Suppose that France is currently producing 1 bottle of wine and 12 pounds of cheese and Germany is currently producing 3 bottles of wine and 10 pounds of cheese. Then, assume instead that France and…
COFFEE (Millions of pounds) 48 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 PPF 1 Maldonia 36 30 POTATOES (Millions of pounds) 06 12 18 24 42 48 COFFEE (Millions of pounds) 48 42 36 30 24 18 12 6 0 PPF 1 0 6 Lamponia 18 42 12 24 30 36 POTATOES (Millions of pounds) 48 Consider the above two graphs which represent production possibilities. What are the comparative advantages? Maldonia has a comparative advantage in potatoes and Lamponia has a comparative advantage in coffee Maldonia has a comparative advantage in both goods O Lamponia has a comparative advantage in both goods O Maldonia has a comparative advantage in coffee adn Lamponia has a comparative advantage in potatoes
Sam can brew 5 gallons of root beer in an hour or he can make 4 pizzas in an hour. Ben can brew 7 gallons of root beer in an hour or he can make 5 pizzas in an hour. Who has an absolute advantage in making pizza? [ Select ] ["Ben", "Sam"] Who has a comparative advantage in making pizza? [ Select ] ["Sam", "Ben"]
Suppose now that Sylvania has a comparative advantage in the production of coffee. Again, Maldonia and Sylvania exchange 12 million pounds of lemons for 12 million pounds of coffee. The following graph shows the PPF for Sylvania, as well as its initial consumption at point A. Place a black point (cross symbol) on the following graph to indicate Sylvania's consumption after trade. 48 2 42 COFFEE (Millions of pounds) 38 PPF 30 24 18 122 O 0 6 12 Sylvania A 38 42 48 24 30 18 LEMONS (Millions of pounds) + Consumption After Trade ? <--Do graph After trade, Sylvania consumes million pounds of lemons as well as million pounds of coffee. 9, 12, 18, 24 9, 12, 18, 24 True or False: Without engaging in international trade, Maldonia and Sylvaniawould not have been able to consume at the after-trade consumption bundles. (Hint: Base this question on the answers you previously entered on this page.) O True O False
Estonia Finland One Cell Phone 40 hours 15 hours Lumber (per board foot) 8 hours 4 hours Table 2-5 shows the number of labor hours required to produce a cell phone and a board foot of lumber in Estonia and Finland. Refer to Table 2-5. Does either Estonia or Finland have a comparative advantage and if so, in what product? O Both countries have the comparative advantage in both lumber and cellphones. O Estonia has an comparative advantage in lumber while Finland has the comparative advantage in cellphones. O Finland has an comparative advantage in lumber while Estonia has the comparative advantage in cellphones. O cannot be determined.
Is it possible to have a comparative advantage without having any absolute advantages ? Yes or No
I can catch 12 kg fish or produce 6 bottles of wine in a week. My neighbour can catch 4 kg of fish or produce 4 bottles of wine in a week. Who has a comparative advantage in wine? Who should specialize in wine if we coordinate our economic activities? My neighbour has a comparative in fish, so he should specialize in fish. My neighbour has a comparative in fish, so he should specialize in wine. My neighbour has a comparative in wine, so I should specialize wine. My neighbour has a comparative in wine, so he should specialize in wine. 09
Consider a simple exchange economy with two people: Bob and Jake. Bob and Jake both have 10 hours of time available. They can use their time to do one of 2 things: make pancakes or make hamburgers. Bob can make 2 hamburgers in an hour or 1 pancake in an hour. Jake can make 3 pancakes in an hour and 2 hamburgers in an hour. Use this information to answer the following question: Who has comparative advantage in the production of hamburgers and who has comparative advantage in the production of pancakes?
Suppose that France and Italy both produce wine and cheese. France's opportunity cost of producing a case of cheese is 5 barrels of wine, while Italy's opportunity cost of producing a case of cheese is 10 barrels of wine. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing cheese in the two countries, you can tell that comparative advantage in the production of cheese and has a comparative advantage in the production of wine. Suppose that France and Italy consider trading cheese and wine. France can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of wine for each case of cheese it exports to Italy. Similarly, Italy can gain from trade as long as it receives of cheese for each barrel of wine it exports to France. more than Based on your answer to the last question, a price ratio between benefit both countries. has a barrels of wine per case of cheese will
France can produce either 50 units or 80 units of wine per labour hour. Canada can produce either 87 units of cheese or 49 units of wine per labour hour. Suppose Canada follows its competitive advantages in deciding what to produce and trade with France at a trade of wine per unit of cheese. For every 3500 units of goods that Canada produces and trades with France, what are the gains from trade in terms of the other goods?
In one month, Manal can knit 2 sweaters or 4 scarves. In one month, Tamara can knit 1 sweater or 3 scarves. Given this information, which of the following statements is TRUE? O Manal has a comparative advantage in knitting scarves but not in knitting sweaters O Manal has a comparative advantage in knitting neither sweaters nor scarves O Manal has a comparative advantage in knitting both sweaters and scarves O Manal has a comparative advantage in knitting sweaters but not in knitting scarves