Roulan has wealth of $40,000 as long as his business does not burn down. However, there is a 50% probability that his business will burn down and cause a $30,000 loss, leaving her with $10,000 of wealth. Roulan's utility function is given by 0.5 U = W, where W is wealth. What is the maximum price that Roulan would pay for full insurance that covers the potential $30,000 loss? (Hint: The maximum price equals the actuarially fair premium plus the risk premium.) $17,500 $22,500 $12,500 $15,500

Roulan has wealth of $40,000 as long as his business does not burn down. However, there is a 50% probability that his business will burn down and cause a $30,000 loss, leaving her with $10,000 of wealth. Roulan's utility function is given by 0.5 U = W, where W is wealth. What is the maximum price that Roulan would pay for full insurance that covers the potential $30,000 loss? (Hint: The maximum price equals the actuarially fair premium plus the risk premium.) $17,500 $22,500 $12,500 $15,500

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

5. Larry, who has wealth (w) of 100, faces a 25% probability that a catastrophe will eliminate all of his wealth. Larry's utility function is u(w) = In (w + 1). We will cover insurance on 12/2 in case you want to hold off on parts (b) and (d) until then. Characterize Larry's preference over risk. Is he risk-averse, risk-loving, or risk-neutral? а. Explain. b. What is the highest premium that Larry would accept for full insurance? C. Alternatively, suppose that Larry's utility is u (w) = e". Characterize his preference for risk and explain your answer. d. Under this alternative utility function, what is the highest premium that Larry would accept for full insurance? Explain.
The value of a successful project is $420,000; the probabilities of success are 1/2 with good supervision and 1/4 without. The manager is risk neutral, not risk averse as in the text, so his expected utility equals his expected income minus his disutility of effort. He can get other jobs paying $90,000, and his disutility for exerting the extra effort for good supervision on your project is $100,000. (a) Show that inducing high effort would require the firm to offer a compensation scheme with a negative base salary; that is, if the project fails, the manager pays the firm an amount stipulated in the scheme. (b) How might a negative base salary be implemented in reality? (c) Show that if a negative base salary is not feasible, then the firm does better to settle for the low-pay, low-effort situation.
Consider the model of competitive insurance discussed in lectures (Topic 6.7). Peter is a risk averse individual with the utility function u(w) = w0.5. His current wealth is $300 and with probability 1/2 he will incur a loss of D = $240, but with probability 1/2 he will incur no loss. Ann has the same utility u(w) = w0.5 and current wealth $300 as Peter, but a different probability of loss: she will incur a loss of D = $240 with probability 0.1, and no loss with probability 0.9. As we showed in lectures, in the separating equilibrium Peter is offered actuarially fair full insurance contract, so his wealth is equal to $180, whether loss happens or not. Ann will be offered an insurance contract with the amount of insurance (approximately) equal to Group of answer choices 0 16 36 66 120 240
Bob's farm harvests corns worth 102 thousand dollars (and nothing else). In each year, there is a 20% chance that a storm will attack and leaves him with only 24 thousand dollars worth of the corns. Bob's preferences over wealth are represented by U = In w. What is the maximum that Bob is willing to pay for full insurance (in unit of thousand dollars)? Please round your answer to the nearest integer.
Economics Fenner Smith from Workouts 13.2 is an investor who has preferences for risk o and returnu given by the utility function u = min (µ, 4 –0). He plans to invest $40,000. The market rate of return is 8 percent and the risk-free rate of return is 2 percent. The risk on the market portfolio is 2 percent. a. How much of his $40,000 will a utility maximizing investor hold in the market portfolio? Show this as Bundle A in your diagram. b. The market return rises to 16 percent.How much of his $40,000 will he hold in the market portfolio. Show this as Bundle C in your diagram. c. Calculate the Hicksian ČV for this change. Show this in your diagram as Bundle B.
A risk-averse consumer with $100,000 in wealth faces 0.1 probability of losing half of his wealth within the next year. a. What is the consumer's expected wealth one year from now? b. An insurance company offers our consumer full insurance against the possible loss. What premium must the consumer be charged for the insurance company to expect to break even? c. Suppose our risk-averse consumer is indifferent between getting $85,000 wealth with certainty and facing the above described uncertain situation. What is the maximum premium that the insurance company will be able to charge this consumer for its full insurance policy?
2. Consider an individual with a current wealth of $100,000 who faces the prospect of a 25% chance of losing $20,000 through theft of her car during the next year. If the person’s utility function is U(X) = ln(X), where X is wealth: a. calculate expected utility without insurance, b. calculate the actuarially fair premium for full insurance, c. calculate expected utility with full insurance at the actuarially fair premium d. calculate the maximum amount the individual would pay for full insurance.
Suppose Alex’s utility function is u ($x) = √x. Assume her initial wealth is 0. Is it possible that Alex’s expected utility from the prospect equals $5, why? What is the possible range of Alex’s expected utility?
Sarah has a utility function expressed as the square root of wealth (w). Currently, Sarah has an initial wealth of $2000 and faces a potential loss of $1500 with a loss probability of .15. What is Sarah's expected utility if an insurer charges her a pure (actuarially fair) premium? 63.75 41.37 42.13 225
Shane just bought a house worth $360,000 in an area that is known for floods. A flood occurs with a 5% chance and if it occurs, his home is ✓ for reduced in value to $202,500. Shane has utility function given by U(X)=√√X. He would be willing to pay a maximum of flood insurance. The fair insurance premium for flood insurance is Shane's risk premium is Suppose, instead, that Shane's utility function is given by U(X) = X². Then, the maximum he would be willing to pay for flood insurance is
Exercise 5: Insurance Consider two individuals, Dave and Eva. Both Dave and Eva have initial wealth 810,000 and face a 40% chance of losing L = 450, 000. Dave has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function up(x) = x and Eva has von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function ug (x) = VT. 1. What do you know about Dave's and Eva's risk preferences? 2. What is the most Dave would be willing to pay for complete insurance against the loss? 3. What is the most Eva would be willing to pay for complete insurance against the loss? Suppose they are each able choose insurance with any coverage level z [0, 1] (i.e. 0 0. 6. Is Eva's optimal choice full insurance, i.e. z = 1?
!