primary sources are sources that have direct knowledge of a particular topic or subject, while secondary sources are those that study primary sources in order to understand and interpret a topic or subject. But does this mean that primary sources are just better than secondary sources? Or can you imagine weaknesses that are intrinsic to primary sources?
primary sources are sources that have direct knowledge of a particular topic or subject, while secondary sources are those that study primary sources in order to understand and interpret a topic or subject. But does this mean that primary sources are just better than secondary sources? Or can you imagine weaknesses that are intrinsic to primary sources?
Related questions
Question
primary sources are sources that have direct knowledge of a particular topic or subject, while secondary sources are those that study primary sources in order to understand and interpret a topic or subject.
But does this mean that primary sources are just better than secondary sources? Or can you imagine weaknesses that are intrinsic to primary sources?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
