Refer to the following formula for expected payoff: Expected payoff = [Probability of rival matching Loss from price cut] + [Probability of rival not matching x Gain from price cut] Suppose the payoff for each of four strategic interactions is as follows: Your Company's Action Reduce Price Don't Reduce Price Rival Response Reduce Price Loss = $800 Loss = $6,000 Don't Reduce Price Gain = $50,000 No Loss or Gain Instructions: Enter your responses as a whole number. If you are entering any negative numbers be sure to include a negative sign (-) in front of those numbers. a. If the probability of rivals matching a price reduction is 98 percent, what is the expected payoff of a price cut? $ b. If the probability of rivals reducing price even though you don't is 5 percent, what is the expected payoff of not reducing price?

Refer to the following formula for expected payoff: Expected payoff = [Probability of rival matching Loss from price cut] + [Probability of rival not matching x Gain from price cut] Suppose the payoff for each of four strategic interactions is as follows: Your Company's Action Reduce Price Don't Reduce Price Rival Response Reduce Price Loss = $800 Loss = $6,000 Don't Reduce Price Gain = $50,000 No Loss or Gain Instructions: Enter your responses as a whole number. If you are entering any negative numbers be sure to include a negative sign (-) in front of those numbers. a. If the probability of rivals matching a price reduction is 98 percent, what is the expected payoff of a price cut? $ b. If the probability of rivals reducing price even though you don't is 5 percent, what is the expected payoff of not reducing price?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following strategic interaction between two Australia telecommuncation companies deciding to set the prices of their ‘unlimited calls‘ mobile package.Try to explain the business reasons behind the relationships between the various payoffs. For example, why is Low the best response to the opponent playing High? Why is the payoff from (High,High) higher for both players than from (Medium, Medium)?
Microsoft and a smaller rival often have to select from one of two competing technologies, A and B. The rival always prefers to select the same technology as Microsoft (because compatibility is important), while Microsoft always wants to select a different technology from its rival. If the two companies select different technologies, Microsoft's payoff is 6 units of utility, while the small rival suffers a loss of utility of 2. If the two companies select the same technology, Microsoft suffers a loss of utility of 2 while the rival gains 2 units of utility. Using the given information, fill in the payoffs for each cell in the matrix, assuming that each company chooses its technology simultaneously. Microsoft Technology A Technology B Rival Technology A Rival: , Microsoft Rival: , Microsoft Technology B Rival: , Microsoft Rival: , Microsoft True or False: There is no equilibrium in pure strategies. True False Note:- Do not provide handwritten…
Olivia is thinking about opening a new bakery (the entrant). There is already a bakery open in her neighborhood (the incumbent), and the owner of the incumbent bakery makes it clear that if Olivia enters the market, they will cut their prices in an attempt to drive the new bakery out of business. Based on the payoff matrix below, is the incumbent’s threat credible? That is, if Olivia opens a new bakery, will the incumbent actually lower their prices? Note: the entrant chooses the row, the incumbent chooses the column High price Low price Enter 1, 2 -1, 1 Don’t enter 0, 10 0, 1 a. Yes, the threat is credible b. No, the threat is not credible
Refer to the following payoff table: Firm A's Advertising Budget Low Multiple Choice Medium High A D G $900, $900 Low $1,000, $800 Firm A High; Firm B Low Firm A Low; Firm B Low Firm B's Advertising Budget Medium B E H $820, $1,220 $950, $1,025 с F 1 High $875, $920 $800, $875 $1,025, $1,175 Using the method of successive elimination of dominated strategies, which strategies, if any, are eliminated after the first round? $1,060, $1,100 $1,040, $1,000
A secluded off-ramp on a highway through the Prairie of Prax has two gas stations, the only gas stations for miles, Northgoings and Southgoings. Suppose Northgoings and Southgoings must simultaneously display their prices, choosing between a high price and low price gas. The payoff matrix for this game, showing potential daily profit, is displayed below. Assume both stations know all of the information in the matrix, and that this is a one-time payoff. Northgoings Decisions High Price Low Price N: $500 N: $800 High Price S: $400 S: $50 Southgoings Decisions N: $100 N: $250 Low Price S: $700 S: $200 (a) According to our model of game theory, Northgoings has a dominant strategy to [Select] (b) According to our model of game theory, Southlgoings has a dominant strategy to [ Select] V (c) According to our model of game theory, the competitive outcome, or Nash Equilibrium, Northgoings will earn [ Select] and Southgoings will earn [ Select] (d) On the other hand, if these two companies…
AP CollegeBoard Test Booklet Unit 4 Problem Set Include correctly labeled diagrams, if useful or required, in explaining your answers. A correctly labeled diagram must have all axes and curves clearly labeled and must show directional changes. If the question prompts you to “Calculate," you must show how you arrived at your final answer. Use the graph provided below to answer parts (a)-(e). Marginal Cost Average Total Cost Average Variable Cost 108 100 55 Demand 0 10 21 31 44 57 77 Quantity Marginal Revenue BigMed, a profit-maximizing firm, has a patent on a medical device, making it the only producer of that device. The graph above shows BigMed's demand, marginal revenue, average total cost, average variable cost, and marginal cost curves. (a) Calculate BigMed's total revenue if the firm produces the allocatively efficient quantity. Show your work. (b) Starting at a price of $100, if BigMed were to increase the price by 2%, will the quantity demanded decrease by more than 2%, by less…
part ii-viii