Recent research has shown that creative people are more likely to cheat than their less-creative counterparts (Gino & Ariely, 2011). Participants in the study first completed creativity assessment questionnaires and then returned to the lab several days later for a series of tasks. One task was a multiple-choice general knowledge test for which the participants circled their answers on the test sheet. Afterward, they were asked to transfer their answers to a bubble sheet for computer scoring. However, the experimenter admitted that the wrong bubble sheet had been copied so that the correct answers were still faintly visible. Thus, the participants had an opportunity to cheat and inflate their test scores. Higher scores were valuable because participants were paid based on the number of correct answers. However, the researchers had secretly coded the original tests and the bubble sheets so that they could measure the degree of cheating for each participant. Assuming that the participants were divided into two groups based on their creativity scores, the following data are similar to the cheating scores obtained in the study. High-Creativity Participants n = 27 M = 7.41 SS = 749.5 Low-Creativity Participants n = 27 M = 4.78 SS = 830 A.Use a one-tailed test with a =.05 to determine whether these data are sufficient to conclude that high-creativity people are more likely to cheat than people with lower levels of creativity B.Compute Cohen’s d to measure the size of the effect. c. Write a sentence demonstrating how the results from the hypothesis test and the measure of effect size would appear in a research report.
Recent research has shown that creative people are
more likely to cheat than their less-creative counterparts
(Gino & Ariely, 2011). Participants in the study
first completed creativity assessment questionnaires
and then returned to the lab several days later for a
series of tasks. One task was a multiple-choice general
knowledge test for which the participants circled their
answers on the test sheet. Afterward, they were asked
to transfer their answers to a bubble sheet for computer
scoring. However, the experimenter admitted that the
wrong bubble sheet had been copied so that the correct
answers were still faintly visible. Thus, the participants
had an opportunity to cheat and inflate their test scores.
Higher scores were valuable because participants were
paid based on the number of correct answers. However,
the researchers had secretly coded the original tests
and the bubble sheets so that they could measure the
degree of cheating for each participant. Assuming that
the participants were divided into two groups based on
their creativity scores, the following data are similar to
the cheating scores obtained in the study.
High-Creativity
Participants
n = 27
M = 7.41
SS = 749.5
Low-Creativity
Participants
n = 27
M = 4.78
SS = 830
A.Use a one-tailed test with a =.05 to determine
whether these data are sufficient to conclude that
high-creativity people are more likely to cheat than
people with lower levels of creativity
B.Compute Cohen’s d to measure the size of the
effect.
c. Write a sentence demonstrating how the results
from the hypothesis test and the measure of effect
size would appear in a research report.
Given the following information-
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
