Rebecca's wage is $10 per hour, and she can work up to 60 hours per week. The table and the budget constraint graph show the trade-off that she faces between income and leisure in one week of potential work at this wage. Her manager raises her wage to $15 per hour. Change the graph below to illustrate her new income-leisure budget constraint. The line and the individual endpoints are movable. Assume that nothing else changes. Hours Leisure time Income ($) worked (hours) at $10/hour 0 200 400 600 0 20 40 60 60 40 20 0 Income ($) 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Rebecca's wage is $10 per hour, and she can work up to 60 hours per week. The table and the budget constraint graph show the trade-off that she faces between income and leisure in one week of potential work at this wage. Her manager raises her wage to $15 per hour. Change the graph below to illustrate her new income-leisure budget constraint. The line and the individual endpoints are movable. Assume that nothing else changes. Hours Leisure time Income ($) worked (hours) at $10/hour 0 200 400 600 0 20 40 60 60 40 20 0 Income ($) 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Kimo is a parent who has $200 in non-labor income. Kimo can earn $10 per hour working between 0 and 60 hours in a week if he works. Draw and label clearly the potential income constraint diagram faced by Kimo What is the slope of the budget constraint
23. A worker has utility over consumption c and leisure I given by U(c,1) = a 6-6 + 18 where 0 << 1 She has T hours to allocate between leisure and work. For each hour she works, she earns a wage of w to spend on consumption c. The price of c is 1. She also receives an additional 'non-labor income' m regardless of how much she works. She maximizes utility subject to the following constraints: contact@cloure.m Assume interior solution, then cw(T-1) +m C≥O 0≤1≤T A. c is normal and I is inferior good. B. c is inferior and I is inferior good. C. c is inferior and I is normal good. D. c is normal and I is normal good. Page 8
The utility of Amanda for leisure (L) and income (Y) is U = LY. The price of income is 1. If Amanda uses her spare L hours a day, (24 - L) hours will be labored. Since wages are w, the daily income is (24 - L). If the wages are positive, show that the optimal number of leisure hours that Amanda will use will always be the same. How much leisure time does Amanda demand and how much work time do she want to provide?
Jones, without a job or job prospects, has been on social assistance for the past four months. Social assistance pays a basic benefit of $600 a month with a benefit reduction rate of 75 percent for earned income. Her welfare benefit is given as B = 600 - 0.75E, where E represents monthly earnings. Jones has just been offered a part-time job working 5 hours a day, 5 days a week, earning an hourly wage of $11. Sketch a budget constraint for Jones given the social assistance scheme in place and the wage rate available for part time work. How much income would she earn if she accepted the job? Would Jones still be on social assistance if she took the job? Draw the budget constraint.
Follow up question g. Explain why the utility curves cannot be drawn so as to induce the worker to work between L1 and L2 hours. h Yelowitz (1995) studies a Medicaid reform measure that reduced the Medicaid work disincentive. One of the reforms he studied raised the Medicaid eligibility threshold income level by 33%. Draw a new version of the fifigure with a new labor–income curve that reflflects this change. Explain how this change might induce someone currently working L1 hours per year to work more, and be sure to draw indifffference curves to support your answer.
Explain in detail Discuss the possible substitution effect and the income effect of an increase in income on leisure time.
In any given week, Anne receives satisfaction only from the consumption of goods and from the consumption of leisure L, which is measured in hours. Obviously, Anne consumes many different types of goods, but for simplicity we aggregate the dollar value of all the goods that she consumes during the week and call it C. Assume that if Anne chooses to work, the hourly wage rate is w=9 and she has to sleep 8 hours per day. (Sleeping time is not considered leisure.) Potentially, if she wants, she can work up to 7 days a week.
3.
Consider Laura who makes $1,400 per week and just won a ‘set for life’ lottery ticket which involves a fortnightly payment of $10,000 for 20 years. Currently she works 35 hours per week. Do the following: 1. Illustrate the effect of the lottery win on lauras budget constraint using a fully labelled diagram where i) the horizontal axis represents the hours of free time per week, and ii) the vertical axis represents lauras weekly consumption. 2. Illustrate on the same diagram lauras optimal decisions before and after the lottery win along with his indifference curves. 3. Based on your diagram, discuss whether Laura will quit her job.
The graph below shows David’s preferences for leisure and consumption. Draw three budget constraints in the graph below. One if David’s wage is $10 per hour (BC1), another if his wage is $20 per hour (BC2) and a third for if his wage is $30 per hour (BC3). Show the optimal combination of leisure and consumption for each of the three budget constraints. Label the optimal amount of Leisure, L1, L2 & L3, and label the optimal amounts of consumption C1, C2 & C3.