READ CAREFULLYYou are to pick two out of the seven political philosophers we have discussed in class, andexplain regarding one of them why you most favor how this philosopher has laid out his way ofseeing the world, and how he explained how best to organize society and government. Thenregarding the second political philosopher, explain why you most disfavor how this philosopherhas laid out his way of seeing the world, and how he explained how best to organize society andgovernment. Consider how they both viewed human nature and the equal/unequal nature ofhumans, and how that helps explain their world view.The length of your response for each philosopher should be 1-2 pages, double spaced with oneinch margin all around. If you quote someone, be sure to reference the quote, and everything elseshould be written in your own words.Here is the list of political philosophers we have discussed in class:Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Marx and NietzscheI

The objective of this question is to critically analyze and compare the political philosophies of…

Answered: READ CAREFULLY You are to pick two out…

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In your own words, explain what is meant by the "invisible hand" in economics. Use a specific example where this concept can be seen in the real world
How does the historical institutionalist approach of political economy differ from rational choice approaches?
The city of Edmonton is trying to figure out if they should add lights to crosswalks on busy roads. The lights would cost the city $80 000 to install and would improve safety at these crosswalks. If the crosswalk lights reduce the risk of fatality by 1 percent and the city estimates the value of human life is $10 million, what would an economist advise the city to do? Select one: O a. The economist would advise the city to install the lights because the cross out expected benefit of $1 000 000 is greater than the cost. O b. The economist would advise the city to not install the lights because the expected benefit of $80 000 is equal to the cost. cross out O c. The economist would advise the city to install the lights because the expected benefit of $100 000 is greater than the cost. cross out O d. The economist would advise the city to not install the lights because the expected benefit of $10 000 is less than the cost. cross out
1. Consider the following conversation.CHAD: “None of the COVID-19 vaccines in Canada has full Health Canadaapproval, and if you get injured from the vaccines, then the pharmaceutical companiesare not liable. Furthermore, the vaccines do not prevent against the spread ofcoronavirus, though they may reduce symptoms. However, their efficacy wanes aftera few months.”VIRGO: “Vaccines have helped humanity to conquer diseases like tetanus andsmallpox. Why are you saying that vaccines don’t help at all?”Which logical fallacy does Virgo commit?(A) Argument from authority.(B) Ad Hominem.(C) Post Hoc Ergo Procter Hoc.(D) Straw Man.
I would say that people who disagree about normative ethical theory CAN still reach an agreement on practical ethical questions in the business world. For the most part, everyone at the end of the day is going to agree on the idea that we must protect the place we all call home-the earth. With that being said, no matter the personal beliefs that everyone has, if they can work together to ensure that factor is being kept in place, they are more than likely going to. That would be on the extreme end. If two different employees had different views regarding the various theories, I am sure they would still work together to come to an agreement that would be for the betterment of the company because they both share the same desire to do well for themselves and the company. please help respond to this discussion post
while this topic may seem insensitive given the recent events in Uvalde (and others), in economics the "Guns vs. Butter" debate has been used for decades to describe the choice and trade-offs between producing a governmental capital goods (guns) vs. personal consumer goods (butter) in society. Please keep this in mind and do not get off topic in the guns vs. no guns debate or the idea of gun legislation. In this exercise you will demonstrate your ability to draw a simple production possibilities curve given data on the quantity of one input (labor) and the amount of labor required to produce each of two outputs (guns and butter). You should also be able to identify the opportunity cost of one good in terms of the other as the slope of the PPC. You will go on to explain your analysis. Guns or Butter? Suppose a nation has a total of 24 units of labor, which can be used to produce either guns or butter. One gun takes 6 units of labor to produce and 1 butter takes 2 units of labor to…
What is Veblen’s critique?
You have taken over the Canadian government. As the Dictator, you took on yourself to end the destruction of the environment by your citizens. As a dictator, you are no longer limited by the challenges of democracy and do not require the agreement of the public but you are limited by the limitations of the existing economic system. Explain what policies you would implement. How you expect these policies to solve the problem. By using the relevant Microeconomic models we learned in class throughout the semester, demonstrate how your policies affect the relevant markets. Show the direct impact and the indirect impact (positive and/or negative) on other markets affected by the changes you propose. For each policy: describe your policy, what are you hoping to achieve, what are your assumptions you are making and explain the economic mechanism that is taking place. Demonstrate graphically how it affect the current status in the market. WITH GRAPH PICTURES
How can economics impact policy
One of the principles of economics is that people respond to incentives. Using this principle, discuss how a tax imposed on people who refuse to get vaccinated against COVID-19 virus affects the national level of vaccination coverage.

Recommended textbooks for you

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305585126

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

Economics

ISBN:

9781337106665

Author:

Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…

Economics

ISBN:

9781259290619

Author:

Michael Baye, Jeff Prince

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS