Question An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous. Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements; 1. On These six applicable case law on the subject matter: Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1892) Gibson v. Manchester City Council (1979) Basic facts Harvey v. Facey (1893) Stevenson, Jacques & Co. v. McLean (1880) Routledge v. Grant (1828) Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd (1953)
Question
An offer can be defined as an intimation of words and conduct, with a desire to enter into a binding arrangement. It is argued for an offer to be effective, the terms of the offer must be clear, precise and unambiguous.
Critically discuss this statement, with the following requirements;
1. On These six applicable case law on the subject matter:
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. (1892)
Gibson v. Manchester City Council (1979) Basic facts
Harvey v. Facey (1893)
Stevenson, Jacques & Co. v. McLean (1880)
Routledge v. Grant (1828)
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd (1953)
2. Thoroughly explain
• The issue
• Basic facts of the Cases
• The Judgement
Note.
• You cannot copy and paste the various cases.
• You are required to discuss via a few paragraphs, what was the issue, basic facts and the judgement.
• Conclude by applying the mentioned cases to the issue at hand in respect of question above.
Requirements:
The answer should include, an introduction as well as a conclusion in respect of both questions.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
