QUESTION 22 Calculate the risk ratio for this study. Round to the nearest hundredth. A hypothetical study was undertaken among 600 ADHD-free children in South Carolina. The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of increased screen time during childhood on the subsequent diagnosis of ADHD by young adulthood. The children's screen time was assessed by a questionnaire, and the children were followed for 10 years. The following data were obtained from the study: Screen Time 4 or More Hours per Day Less than 4 Hours per Day Total ADHD 125 175 300 No ADHD 135 165 300 Total 260 340 600

QUESTION 22 Calculate the risk ratio for this study. Round to the nearest hundredth. A hypothetical study was undertaken among 600 ADHD-free children in South Carolina. The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of increased screen time during childhood on the subsequent diagnosis of ADHD by young adulthood. The children's screen time was assessed by a questionnaire, and the children were followed for 10 years. The following data were obtained from the study: Screen Time 4 or More Hours per Day Less than 4 Hours per Day Total ADHD 125 175 300 No ADHD 135 165 300 Total 260 340 600

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Transforming raw scores into z scores allows researchers to: Question 24 options: determine the significance of a statistical analysis. describe the typical score in a set of scores. compare variables measured on different units of measurement. compare variables measured on the same units of measurement.
For causal inference from observational data, statistical information need to be supplemented with expert knowledge. Group of answer choices a. True b. False 2. In the medical example, there was evidence of effect modification by sex. Group of answer choices a. True b. False
This question is from the below book, Chapter 15 (Comparing means of more than two groups) , AP 27 Book-Analysis of biological data 2nd Edition Michael C. Whitlock, Dolph Schluter Publisher: W. H. Freeman ISBN: 978193622148 Does adding math to a scientific paper make readers think that it has more value? Erikkson (2012) sent two abstracts of scientific papers to 200 people with postgraduate degrees. For each participant, one of the abstracts was randomly chosen and had a meaningless sentence inserted describing an unrelated. mathematics model, while the other had no mathematical addition. The sentence had no conceptual connection to the subject matter of the abstract; it was just meaningless mathematics in that context. Participants were asked to rate the quality of the research in each abstract on a scale from 1 to 100 and the differences between the scores of their two abstracts -score of the abstract with math minus score of abstract without math-were recorded. Participants were…
The following data were obtained from a repeated-measures study. What is the value of SS for the difference scores? Subject 1 st 2 nd #1 10 11 #2. 4 6 #3 7 9 #4 6 5 A. 10 B. 9 C. 6 D. 4 E. 1
What is the summary of the overall model of the data shown in question 1? Is it one that you would trust from a statistical standpoint? specifically why ?
What are some issues to consider if you are planning to use statistical analysis in your research? Select all that apply. Question 7 options: Collecting some statistics may require training on particular software or may even require expertise. You might need to acquire the data from another department in your agency or school, such as IT, and that can be time consuming. Software and expertise can be costly. How strong are your math skills?
what was the margin of error for this study?
QUESTION 2 Using the same anti-venom study, answer the following questions. Researchers wanted to know the effectiveness of a new anti-venom. A study was conducted on 150 children who had nonlethal scorpion stings. The ages of the children ranged from 6 months to 18 years old. Each child was randomly assigned to receive a shot of the anti-venom or a placebo shot. Researchers recorded whether or not their condition improved over the next four hours. a. Identify the population for the study.b. Identify the sample for the study.c. Was this an observational study or a controlled experiment? Explain how you know.d. Assuming the rest of the study was well-designed, use the percentages you calculated in question 1 and the type of study conducted to discuss whether it would be reasonable to conclude that the new anti-venom is effective at treating nonlethal scorpion stings in children.
What was the power for this study?
Question 1 1. Which IAT data set are you working with? 2. 3. Use StatCrunch and your unique IAT sample to estimate the mean age for the population of IAT participants at the 90% confidence level. Copy the contents of your StatCrunch output window and paste them into your response. (No need to type anything here - just copy and paste the contents of your StatCrunch output window.) Are conditions met to estimate the mean age for the population of IAT participants? (Be sure to support your answer as demonstrated throughout Unit 8.) 4. State the confidence interval, and then interpret the confidence interval in context. 5. What is the margin of error (MOE)? 6. Which would be more accurate, the 90% confidence interval you found or an 85% confidence interval? Briefly explain. Which would be more precise? Briefly explain. One sample T confidence interval: μ: Mean of variable 90% confidence interval results: Variable Sample(IAT-Weight-Score) Sample Mean Std. Err. DF L. Limit U. Limit…
You collect information on a random sample of women and obtain estimates on vitamin D exposure. However, the results that you find are different than those conducted at another study site. Should you be concerned? Explain your answer using the concept of sampling variability
. Do patients with gastrointestinal issues experience more psychological distress than the general population? The DASS-21 questionnaire is a validated measure of depression, anxiety, and stress. For the general population, the mean for anxiety is µ = 4.2. Anxiety levels are calculated based on self-reported answers to questions on a scale from 0 through 42, with lower scores indicating lower anxiety. Participants with gastrointestinal issues (specifically inflammatory bowel disease, IBD) completed the DASS-21. Use the data presented below to determine whether having gastrointestinal issues like IBD significantly increases risk for anxiety. Test whether or not the performance of this sample is significantly higher than the normal population using the proper t-test. Here are the data: Anxiety scores: 12, 15, 10, 8, 10, 5, 10, 13, 4, 6 ANALYSES AND UNGRADED OPTIONAL GUIDING QUESTIONS: 1a. Identify the Indep.Variable:__ Dep.Variable:__ Is it the Hypothesis…