Question # 1 Revisit Given below are an assertion and a reason, Write option A if both assertion and reason are correct and reason statement explain the assertion statement, B if both assertion and reason statements are correct but reason does not explain the assertion, C if assertion statement is correct but reason statement is wrong D if assertion statement is wrong but reason statement is correct, and E if both assertion and reason statements are wrong Also give proper logic for your answer ustifying your choice. Please remember that partially correct logic or just repeating the assertion-reason statements in answer will not get any mark. Assertion: The iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategy requires only the assumption of rationality. Reason: A rational player will never play a strictly dominated strategy. Assertion: In the Cournot duopoly with equal marginal costs, if the total market demand increases, then equilibrium price will decrease. Reason: As demand increases, firms will produce more as a result of which prices will fall

Question # 1 Revisit Given below are an assertion and a reason, Write option A if both assertion and reason are correct and reason statement explain the assertion statement, B if both assertion and reason statements are correct but reason does not explain the assertion, C if assertion statement is correct but reason statement is wrong D if assertion statement is wrong but reason statement is correct, and E if both assertion and reason statements are wrong Also give proper logic for your answer ustifying your choice. Please remember that partially correct logic or just repeating the assertion-reason statements in answer will not get any mark. Assertion: The iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategy requires only the assumption of rationality. Reason: A rational player will never play a strictly dominated strategy. Assertion: In the Cournot duopoly with equal marginal costs, if the total market demand increases, then equilibrium price will decrease. Reason: As demand increases, firms will produce more as a result of which prices will fall

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Vll definitely upvote.
Question 18 Use the following table for the question below. Dynaco Decision Synergy Decision Large Budget Small Budget Large Synergy.gains.20.million Synergy gains zero Budget Dynaco gains 30 million Dynaco gains 70 million Small Synergy.gains.30.million Budget Dynaco gains zero Synergy.gains.40.million Dynaco gains 50 million If the two firms were allowed to work together (collude) and create a binding agreement, what is the optimal (best) outcome for both of them? O Synergy gains $40 million and Dynaco gains $50 million O Synergy gains zero and Dynaco gains $70 million O Synergy gains $20 million and Dynaco gains $30 million O Synergy gains $30 million and Dynaco gains zero
Topic One: Substitutes and Complements 1. How do retail stores display their merchandise taking into account substitute or complementary goods? Give some examples. 2. Have your purchases been influenced by these marketing techniques? Give some examples. Topic Two: Measuring Opportunity Cost How would you suggest to measure the opportunity cost of a parent that chooses to play with their child vice play sudoku? How would you measure the opportunity cost of the kid? Topic Three: Marginal Analysis, Opportunity Cost We read this week that opportunity cost must be used to make rational decisions, we also read that people should make decisions after considering marginal benefit versus marginal cost. Could you think in situations that you could use opportunity cost, marginal benefit and marginal cost concepts to make your own decisions? Provide examples.
choose the corrrect answer: Question: This specifies that an action that could benefit more people and more subject should be achieved for the certain scenario. A. Common Good B. Greater/Greatest Good
1 explain the role of ceteris paribus in economic analysis
i need the answer quickly
Is this example also an example of economically rational decision making? “In 2019, I started my small business by selling prints of my photographs. Now it’s temporarily closed. During this time I had the option of shipping my prints through USPS or UPS. I decided to ship my prints through USPS instead of UPS since it was a bit expensive at the time. My prints that were shipped out from USPS arrived in time and came in good condition. The opportunity cost is the cost of UPS shipping.”
how "framing effect" in economy from behaviorual economy affects managers decision making for increasing companies' profit?
You pay a cover charge of $50 to get into a popular local nightclub. As the DJ is playing and you are dancing, you suddenly realize that you would much rather be at home studying economics. But $50 is a lot of money for you. Shouldn’t that affect your decision to stay or go? Select one: a. No. The $50 is a sunk cost. b. Yes. The $50 is an avoidable cost. c. Yes. Stay and get your money’s worth. d. No. This is your special night out, so don’t consider costs of any kind.
35. The process of consumers making choices is easy; because resources are plentiful. True or False 36. You need to make your economic choice(s) in a way that carefully considers the cost and benefits of each possibility. True or False
1. The rules regarding economic decision maker behavior are: Group of answer choices A: Consumers behave rationally and maximize utility, but producers do not behave rationally B: Producers behave rationally and maximize profits, but consumers do not behave rationally C: consumers are ratiional and maximize utility, and producers are rational and maximize profits D: Consumers maximize total consumption, and producers maximize production
Oscar purchased a $30 steak for dinner, but burned it bad on the grill. Since he paid top dollar for the steak he figures he should eat it anyways. Is Oscar properly using economic reasoning? Yes, the marginal cost of not eating the steak would be $30. No, the $30 spent on the steak is a sunk cost and should not be included in his decision whether to eat the steak or not.. Yes, if he doesn't eat the steak he will have wasted economic resources. No, the opportunity of eating the steak is whatever else he could have purchased for the $30.