Question 1- Coordination Game There are two firms whose factories sit alongside a lake. It costs each firm $1,800 to install filters to avoid polluting the lake. Because both firms use the lake's water to produce goods, a polluted lake hurts their production process and increases their costs. Assume that the cost to each firm of a polluted lake is $1,200 times the number of polluting firms. a) Fill in the payoff matrix below based on the above information. Firm 1 Pollute Use Filter Pollute Firm 2 b) What is the pure strategy Nash Equilibrium of the game? Use Filter c) In the extensive form of the game, with Firm 1 choosing first, is the Nash Equilibrium different? Explain.

Question 1- Coordination Game There are two firms whose factories sit alongside a lake. It costs each firm $1,800 to install filters to avoid polluting the lake. Because both firms use the lake's water to produce goods, a polluted lake hurts their production process and increases their costs. Assume that the cost to each firm of a polluted lake is $1,200 times the number of polluting firms. a) Fill in the payoff matrix below based on the above information. Firm 1 Pollute Use Filter Pollute Firm 2 b) What is the pure strategy Nash Equilibrium of the game? Use Filter c) In the extensive form of the game, with Firm 1 choosing first, is the Nash Equilibrium different? Explain.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a prisoner’s dilemma of the sort studied in Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of 10, or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 16, but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 32, which is divided equally between the two countries. a. In Table, fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment.
(1) Two firms (A and B) that produce timber products pollute a local forest with pesticides used to grow trees. Currently, firm A releases 100 pounds of pesticide waste into the forest per month, while firm B releases 140 pounds of pesticide waste into forest per month. The table below shows the cost of reducing pesticide waste by increments of 10 pounds for each firm. For each firm, reductions beyond 50 pounds would be virtually impossible to accomplish and expensive if it is to stay in business, because some pesticide must be used. Total cost of reducing Firm A pesticide waste by 10 pounds 20 pounds 30 pounds 40 pounds 50 pounds Firm B $6 $4 $18 $12 $36 $24 $60 $40 $90 $64 Suppose the government wants to reduce pesticide waste level to 180 pounds. That is, the government wants to reduce pesticide waste from its current monthly level to 180 pounds per month. To achieve this goal, the government decides to issue permits to pollute. A total of 18 permits are issued, where each permit…
Table 3. This table shows a game played between two firms, Firm A and Firm B. In this game each firm must decide how much output (Q) to produce: 5 units or 6 units. The profit for each firm is given in the table as (Profit for Firm A. Profit for Firm B). Firm A Q=5 Q=6 Firm B Q=5 (24, 24) (30, 10) Q=6 (10,30) (19, 19) Refer to Table 3. The dominant strategy For Firm A is to produce Select one: O a. 5 units and the dominant strategy for Firm B is to produce 5 units. b. 5 units and the dominant strategy for Firm B is to produce 6 units. c. 6 units and the dominant strategy for Firm B is to produce 5 units. d. 6 units and the dominant strategy for Firm B is to produce 6 units.
(8) For each situation, solve whether collusion is sustainable using "trigger strategy" (infinitely repeated) 7 punished cheat> and see if the incentive compatibility inequality (condition for collusion to occur as a Nash equilibrium) is satisfied. 8a) Stage Game is Bertrand with Homogeneous Product; cost same as before but overall demand is Q(P) = 375 - 15 P and given 8 = 0.9 8b) Same as 4a) but given & = 0.5 8c) Stage Game is Cournot; Joe and Sarah have a constant MC P(Q) = 20 – 0.1 × Q where Q = Qjoe + Qsarah and given 8 =0.9 8d) Same as 4c) above but given 8 = = 0.5 8e) Try 4c) and 4d) assuming Sarah's MC = $5 but Joe's MC = $8. They both collude on Sarah's Monopoly Output.
Consider a simple example of a payoff matrix in the context of a trade dispute between two countries, Country A and Country B. In this scenario, both countries can either choose to impose tariffs (T) or not impose tariffs (N) on each other's exports. The payoffs that each country experiences are based on the chosen strategies and are presented below. (a) Does Country A and B have a dominant strategy? If so, specify its dominant strategy and explain your answer clearly.(b) What is the Nash equilibrium. Explain your answer clearly.(c) Suppose now the trade dispute is played sequentially, with Country B moving first. Represent the trade dispute in and extensive form.(d) Is this trade dispute a prisoner's dilemma game? Explain your answer.
Consider the Normal Form Game characterized in the following figure: P1\P2 X Y Z A B с (1,1) (0,0) (-1,0) (0,0) (2,2) (0,0) (0,-1) (0,0) (3,3) Which is the Strictly Dominated Strategy for player 1? O (1,0,0) O (0,1,0) O (0,0,1) There are no strictly dominated strategies for player 1
Starbucks and Krispy Kreme are trying to decide whether or not to open a shop in the new Mall of Africa. They both prefer if the other firm opens a shop because they can draw bigger crowds but neither wants to be the only American-branded coffee shop in the Mall. The payoff matrix for this dilemma is below. Krispy Kreme Open Don't Open Starbucks Open (i) (ii) 5.5 2,6 Don't open (iii) (iii) 6,2 3.3 MCQ question 4 Find the Nash Equilibrium (Starbucks, Krispy Kreme) for the payoff matrix when the game is played simultaneously. A. (5;5) only. OB. (6,2) only. OC. (2,6) only OD. (3,3) only O E. There is no stable Nash Equilibrium.
2) Two firms, X and Y, are planning to market their new products. Each firm can develop either TV or Laptop. Market research indicates that the resulting profits to each firm for the alternative strategies are given by the following payoff matrix: FIRM Y TV LAPTOP FIRM X TV 30, 30 60, 35 LAPTOP 40,70 20, 20 A) If both firms make their decisions at the same time and follow maximin (low-risk) strategies, what will the outcome be? B) Suppose both firms try to maximize profits, but Firm X has a head start in planning, and can commit first. Now what will the outcome be? What will the outcome be if Firm Y has a head start in planning and can commit first? C) What is the cooperative outcome? D) Which firm benefits most from the cooperative outcome? How much would that firm need to offer the other?
None
please if you can teach explain
Suppose you have one type of customer who comes to see your team play and that customer has a demand curve of P = $40 - Q. Also assume the marginal cost of having a person come to see your game is a constant $2. If you were to charge a two-part pricing scheme whereby you charged a PSL and then a price-per-ticket, which strategy would lead to the highest possible profit per customer? PSL = $722; P = $2 %3D PSL = $361; P = $21 %3D PSL = $1,444; P = $21 %3D PSL = $361; P = $2 %3D