Quality engineering question
Please read the pages and make a short and clear summary of them with your own words please. Mention only the necessary important parts
Also, you will put your comments and ideas about the topic briefly
It is what you understand
You must prepare neat the summary
Thank you
Transcribed Image Text: Reading
Literacy
Hours per
Automobile
Country
Finland
543
60 -
• Approximately 15 percent of the people in the United States currently live in poverty.
• More than 45 million people in the United States currently live in paverty.
• The poverty rate in the United States for children under the age of 18 is
approximately 20 percent.
• The United States has the largest income distribution between its wealthiest and
poorest citizens in the world.
Korea
534
Canada
528
50 -
Australia
525
Liechtenstein
525
New Zealand
522
40-
Ireland
515
31
Sweden
514
30-
FIGURE 2.11 Selected Economic Indicators.
Netherlands
513
Hong Kong
510
19
20
20
507
15
Delgium
Norway
Switzerland
500
COMPARISONS OF
INTERNATIONAL COMPETITORS
10 -
499
Japan
498
Macao
498
U.S. European
According to a report published by the World Economic
Forum, the United States has reclaimed its place as the most
competitive country in the world community. This is good
news, since the United States had slipped to fifth place dur-
ing the 1990s. This means that in spite of the poor perfor-
Japanese
Manufacturers
Japanese
Plants
in the U.S.
Poland
497
Manufacturers Manufacturers
France
496
United States
495
FIGURE 2.9 Comparative Productivity of Automobile
Manufacturers (Most Productive Plants). Source: Congress of
FIGURE 2.7 Mean Achievement Scores in Reading Literacy. the United States, Office of Technology Assessment, 2014.
in the United States when compared with
mance of students
the performance of students in other industrialized nations,
the United States has managed to improve in the areas of
standard of living, manufacturing productivity, investment,
and trade, which are critical indicators of national competi-
tive status (Figure 2.12).
Source: www.ed.gov, 2014.
Advanced Problem-Solving Skills
Defects per
100 Vehicles
70% plus
Korea...
150 -
• Japan.
• Finland.
70% plus
110
70% plus
100 -
• Germany.
• Czech Republic.
58%
06
70
60
58%
50 -
Average 52%
Trade
Japanese
Manufacturers
Japanese
Plants
in the U.S.
U.S.
European
Manufacturers Manufacturers
• Ireland...
51%
• Russia.
• United States.........
43%
FIGURE 2.10 Comparative Defect Frequency Among
Automobile Manufacturers. Source: Congress of the
United States, Office of Technology Assessment, 2014.
42%
Investment
FIGURE 2.8 Percent of Students with Advanced Problem-
Solving Skills. Source: www.ed.gov, 2014.
Manufacturing
Productivity
Even a cursory examination of key economic indica-
Another basis for comparison among automobile manu- tors raises concerns. The ability of a country to compete
facturers is quality. Productivity gained at the expense of qual-
ity yields no competitive advantage. Figure 2.10 compares the quality of life. Manufacturing created the great American
major automobile-producing nations in terms of the average
number of defects per 100 vehicles manufactured. The qual-
in the manufacturing arena is a direct determinant of its
Standard
middle class. If the manufacturing sector dwindles because
it cannot compete globally, the middle class dwindles cor-
of
Living
ity comparisons follow the same trends found in the carlicr respondingly. Figure 2.11 contains a number of facts that
productivity comparisons. Japanese manufacturers average
the fewest defects; European manufacturers average the most.
American manufacturers find it difficult to compete in the
global marketplace when their productivity and quality are competition.
not up to international standards-a situation that must be
reversed if the United States is to regain the preeminent posi-
tion it has historically enjoyed in the world community.
indicate what has happened to the U.S. economy during
the years since World War II. These are the years in which
U.S. manufacturers have steadily lost ground to foreign
FIGURE 2.12 Critical Indicators of National Competitive Status.
Do these comparisons mean that U.S. manufacturers
cannot compete? The answer is no. American manufacturers
were slow to respond to the international quality revolution.