Problem FIn a liquid limit test, using acone penetrometer, the following readings wererecorded.Moisture content (%)Cone Penetration31.815.440.617.452.819.263.222.171.624.3PLASTIC LIMIT TESTWeight of wet soil + container =23.22 gWeight of dry soil + container =Weight of container21.52 g15.07 gNATURAL WATER CONTENT TESTWeight of wet soil + container =Weight of dry soil + container =Weight of container18.33 g15.64 g8.05 ga. Compute the liquid limit.b. Compute the plastic limit.c. Compute the natural water content.d. Compute the plasticity index.

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/1e953364-3df2-4710-95d0-d86a1254d582.jpg

Problem F In a liquid limit test, using a cone penetrometer, the following readings were recorded. Moisture content (%) Cone Penetration 31.8 15.4 40.6 17.4 52.8 19.2 63.2 22.1 71.6 24.3 PLASTIC LIMIT TEST Weight of wet soil + container = 23.22 g 21.52 g Weight of dry soil + container = Weight of container 15.07 g NATURAL WATER CONTENT TEST Weight of wet soil + container = 18.33 g 15.64 g 8.05 g Weight of dry soil + container = Weight of container a. Compute the liquid limit. b. Compute the plastic limit. c. Compute the natural water content. d. Compute the plasticity index.

Problem F In a liquid limit test, using a cone penetrometer, the following readings were recorded. Moisture content (%) Cone Penetration 31.8 15.4 40.6 17.4 52.8 19.2 63.2 22.1 71.6 24.3 PLASTIC LIMIT TEST Weight of wet soil + container = 23.22 g 21.52 g Weight of dry soil + container = Weight of container 15.07 g NATURAL WATER CONTENT TEST Weight of wet soil + container = 18.33 g 15.64 g 8.05 g Weight of dry soil + container = Weight of container a. Compute the liquid limit. b. Compute the plastic limit. c. Compute the natural water content. d. Compute the plasticity index.

Structural Analysis

6th Edition

ISBN:9781337630931

Author:KASSIMALI, Aslam.

Publisher:KASSIMALI, Aslam.

Chapter2: Loads On Structures

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

sit b
clear and step by step solution pls
Problem 1. A liquid limit test conducted on a soil sample in the cup device gave the following results: 1 2 3 4 Test No. Number of blows 40 27 23 19 35.62 36.92 41.37 46.80 Weight of Container + Lid + Wet Soil (g) Weight of Container + Lid + Dry Soil (g) Weight of Container + Lid (g) 31.08 30.19 33.11 35.78 13.05 11.74 12.36 11.45 The plastic limit test and natural water content. Natural Water Content Test Test No. 1 1 2 22.12 17.53 16.97 Weight of Container + Lid + Wet Soil (g) Weight of Container + Lid + Dry Soil (g) Weight of Container + Lid (g) 20.59 15.45 14.93 13.07 7.84 7.5 The shrinkage limit test. Weight of Dish with petroleum jelly (g) 11.3 38.51 Weight of Dish with petroleum jelly + Wet Soil (g) Weight of Dish with petroleum jelly + Dry Soil (g) 32.81 Volume of Shrinkage Dish (cm³) 15.26 Volume of Oven-Dried Soil Pat (cm³) 12.83 Create a spreadsheet for the result of the Atterberg Limit Test above which will determine and show the following: a. Flow curve b. Liquid Limit c.…
76 .ll Q3.png The data from standard and modified proctor test on a soil sample (density of solids: 2680 kg/m3 ) are provided below: Standard proctor test Modified proctor test Dry density (kg/m) 1691 Dry density (kg/m') 1873 Water content (%) Water content (%) 9.3 9.3 1715 11,8 1910 12.8 1755 14.3 1803 15.5 1747 17.6 1699 18.7 1685 20.8 1641 21.1 1619 23 a) Plot the compaction curves (both standard and modified in one graph). b) Establish the maximum dry density and optimum water content for each test.
Soil mechanics ضهقحشكوظز
In a liquid limit test, using a cone penetrometer, the following readings were recorded. Moisture Content (%) Cone Penetration (mm) 32.26 14.4 41.92 16.4 51.96 18.2 64.52 21.2 72.76 22.3 Plastic Limit Test: Weight of wet soil + container 22.28 g Weight of dry soil + container 20.42 g Weight of container 13.39 g Natural Water Content: Weight of wet soil + container 17.69 g Weight of dry soil + container 14.84 g Weight of container 8.16 g Determine: A. Liquid Limit B. Plastic Limit C. Natural Water Content D. Plastic Index E. Liquidity Index
76 ll 6 Q3.png The data from standard and modified proctor test on a soil sample (density of solids: 2680 kg/m3 ) are provided below: Standard proctor test Modified proctor test Dry density (kg/m’) 1873 Dry density (kg/m®) Water content (%) Water content (%) 1691 9.3 9.3 1715 11.8 1910 12,8 1755 14.3 1803 15.5 1747 17.6 1699 18.7 1685 20.8 1641 21.1 1619 23 a) Plot the compaction curves (both standard and modified in one graph). b) Establish the maximum dry density and optimum water content for each test.
Determine the moisture content, the moisture content by dry weight per trial based on the table below. Description Trial 1 Trial 2 Trail 3 Trial 4 Weight of empty aluminum dish (g) 38.1151 38.1474 38.9473 38.7400 Weight of aluminum dish and soil sample (g) 90.1440 85.7554 86.6980 85.1235 Weight of aluminum dish and dry soil 67.0170 64.1915 65.1110 63.8859 Then calculate the mean, sd, and rsd of the measurements.
determine the liquid limit of the soil test no 1 2 3 4 cone penetration in mm 12 16 23 28 mass of wet soil + container (g) 34.4 36.7 41.5 45.7 mass of dry soil + container (g) 28.1 29.1 31.2 33.9 mass of container (g) 10 12.4 11.2 11.9
A liquid limit test conducted on a soil sample in the cup device gave the following results: N 10 19 23 27 40 w (%) 60.0 45.3 39.8 36.5 25.2 The plastic limit test and natural water content. Natural Water Content Test Test No. Weight of Container + Lid (g) Weight of Container + Lid + Wet Soil (g) Weight of Container + Lid + Dry Soil (g) Plastic Limit 2 2 13.07 13.18 7.84 7.5 22.12 21.84 17.53 16.97 20.59 20.35 15.45 14.93 The shrinkage limit test. Weight of Dish with petroleum jelly (g) Weight of Dish with petroleum jelly + Wet Soil (g) Weight of Dish with petroleum jelly + Dry Soil (g) Volume of Shrinkage Dish (cm³) Volume of Oven-Dried Soil Pat (cm³) 11.3 38.51 32.81 15.26 12.83 27. Determine the liquid limit. b. 39% 28. Determine the plastic limit. а. 38% С. 37% d. 40% a. 20.56% b. 21.20% C. 21.85% d. 20.20% 29. Determine the shrinkage limit. b. 22.40% а. 15.20% C. 18.59% d. 16.45%
A falling-head permeability test was run on a soil sample 9.6 cm in diameter and 10 cm long. The head at the start of the test was 90 cm. The coefficient of permeability of the soil was found to be 5x10 cm/s. The diameter of the stand pipe was 1 cm. Determine how much head was lost during the first 33 mins. 82.84 7.16 6.88 O 83.12
1. From the video, the following data were obtained. a. Mass of SSD Sand = 505.0g b. Mass of pycnometer with water only = 679.0g c. Mass of pycnometer with sand and water = d. Mass of dry sand (Not show in the video) = 491.0g %3D = 952.0g Calculate the specific gravity values (dry and SSD condition) 2. The specific gravity and absorption test (ASTM C128) was performed on fine aggregates and the following data were obtained. a. Mass of SSD Sand = 500.0g b. Mass of pycnometer with water only = 623.og c. Mass of pycnometer with sand and water = d. Mass of Dry Sand = 495-5g %3D 938.2g %3D Calculate the specific gravity values (dry and SSD).