Problem 3: For what emf & does the 2002 resistor in Fig.3 dis- sipate no power? Should the emf be oriented with its positive terminal at the top or at the bottom? a) If the 200 S2 resistor dissipates no power, what does this mean for the distribution of the currents in the circuit? In other words, how are the currents through the different resistors related in this case? SOV 10052 ww 20052 30052 ww £? FIG. 3: The scheme for Problem 3
Problem 3: For what emf & does the 2002 resistor in Fig.3 dis- sipate no power? Should the emf be oriented with its positive terminal at the top or at the bottom? a) If the 200 S2 resistor dissipates no power, what does this mean for the distribution of the currents in the circuit? In other words, how are the currents through the different resistors related in this case? SOV 10052 ww 20052 30052 ww £? FIG. 3: The scheme for Problem 3
Related questions
Question
Hello, I really need help with part A and Part B, I was just wondering if you can help me with PART A and Part B and can you also label them as well.
Expert Solution
Step 1 unknown emf
It is given that no power dissipates along the resistor.
It means there should be no current across the resistor. So we have to choose the emf value and its orientation in such a way that the potential across the ends of the resistor becomes the same.
According to Kirchhoff's current law, the sum of all incoming current at a branch point is equal to the sum of all outgoing currents.
Step by step
Solved in 5 steps with 6 images