Présent bias may induce individuals to save too little for old age, when they no longer have labour income. Consider the following model to address this concern formally. Assume that an individual lives for three periods, t= 0, 1, 2 and has income w in both periods 0 and 1 but zero income in period 2. In each period t the individual derives utility (T) = ln(r) from consumption T. The individual discounts the future. Lifetime utility U, from the perspective of period t= 0, respectively t = 1 is given by: Uo= uo + Bou₁ + B8² u₂ and U₁ = ₁ + Bôu₂. where 0 < 8 ≤ 1 and 0 ri, but that the individual's preferred consumption r in period 0 when anticipating that later consumption will be (1, 1) is the same as ro, i.e. the individual would prefer to save a higher proportion of their period 1 income from a period 0 point of view than from a period 1 point of view. If the individual is aware of their present bias, could a financial product that prevents borrowing, requires an investment k in period 0 and pays back k in period 2 increase period 0 utility Uo? Argue verbally or compute.

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter17: Capital And Time
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 17.1P
icon
Related questions
Question
3
c please
Présent bias may induce individuals to save too little for old age, when they no longer
have labour income. Consider the following model to address this concern formally.
Assume that an individual lives for three periods, t 0, 1,2 and has income w in
both periods 0 and 1 but zero income in period 2. In each period t the individual
derives utility u4(1L) = In(r;) from consumption I. The individual discounts the
future. Lifetime utility U, from the perspective of period t = 0, respectively t = 1 is
%3D
given by:
Uo = uo + Bou + B8*uz and U1 = u1 + Bôuz,
%3D
where 0 < 8 <1 and 0 < B< 1. The individual can borrow and save,at an interest.
rate of 0, so that total consumption expenditure must equal the sum of income.
(a) Derive the individual's preferred consumption plan (z6, Tỉ, r5) from a period
1 = () perspective (i.e. maximising Uo). Explain the roles of parameters B and 6.
(b) Derive the individual's preferred consumption pattern (zN, ) from a period
t = 1 perspective (i.e. maximising U1) for a given value of zo. Explain the
difference, if any, between (zN, 1) and (ri, 13).
(c) Suppose that > i, but that the individual's preferred consumption r in
period 0 when anticipating that later consumption will be (z, ) is the same
as ri, i.e. the individual would prefer to save a higher proportion of their period
1 income from a period 0 point of view than from a period 1 point of view. If the
individual is aware of their present bias, could a financial product that prevents
borrowing, requires an investment k in period 0 and pays back k in period 2
increase period 0 utility Uo? Argue verbally or compute
Transcribed Image Text:c please Présent bias may induce individuals to save too little for old age, when they no longer have labour income. Consider the following model to address this concern formally. Assume that an individual lives for three periods, t 0, 1,2 and has income w in both periods 0 and 1 but zero income in period 2. In each period t the individual derives utility u4(1L) = In(r;) from consumption I. The individual discounts the future. Lifetime utility U, from the perspective of period t = 0, respectively t = 1 is %3D given by: Uo = uo + Bou + B8*uz and U1 = u1 + Bôuz, %3D where 0 < 8 <1 and 0 < B< 1. The individual can borrow and save,at an interest. rate of 0, so that total consumption expenditure must equal the sum of income. (a) Derive the individual's preferred consumption plan (z6, Tỉ, r5) from a period 1 = () perspective (i.e. maximising Uo). Explain the roles of parameters B and 6. (b) Derive the individual's preferred consumption pattern (zN, ) from a period t = 1 perspective (i.e. maximising U1) for a given value of zo. Explain the difference, if any, between (zN, 1) and (ri, 13). (c) Suppose that > i, but that the individual's preferred consumption r in period 0 when anticipating that later consumption will be (z, ) is the same as ri, i.e. the individual would prefer to save a higher proportion of their period 1 income from a period 0 point of view than from a period 1 point of view. If the individual is aware of their present bias, could a financial product that prevents borrowing, requires an investment k in period 0 and pays back k in period 2 increase period 0 utility Uo? Argue verbally or compute
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 8 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Risk Aversion
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613057
Author:
Tucker
Publisher:
CENGAGE L
Micro Economics For Today
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613064
Author:
Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Economics For Today
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613040
Author:
Tucker
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Survey Of Economics
Survey Of Economics
Economics
ISBN:
9781337111522
Author:
Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:
Cengage,