Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
Psychology
Please read Experiment #1 and answer these 3 questions about it, thank you so much!! Experiment #1 Questions: 1. Identify the IV and its levels.
 2. Identify the DV and how it is being measured.
 3. Does this study utilize a between or within-subjects design?

Please read Experiment #1 and answer these 3 questions about it, thank you so much!! Experiment #1 Questions: 1. Identify the IV and its levels.
 2. Identify the DV and how it is being measured.
 3. Does this study utilize a between or within-subjects design?

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
5th Edition
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1TY
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Please read Experiment #1 and answer these 3 questions about it, thank you so much!! Experiment #1 Questions: 1. Identify the IV and its levels.
 2. Identify the DV and how it is being measured.
 3. Does this study utilize a between or within-subjects design?
1862 Vobs et al. spent the same amount of time (10 min) in the orderly or disorderly environment. Next, participants were presented with an opportunity to donate to a charity. They learned that the department in which the study was being conducted supports a char- ity that supplies children with toys and books (Fennis, Janssen, & Vohs, 2009). Participants wrote the amount, if any, they chose to donate on a sheet of paper, which they placed into a sealed envelope (so that self-presenta- tion concerns would be dispelled). The researcher then discussed the concepts measured in the filler questionnaires as a partial debriefing. Upon exiting, participants were allowed to take an apple or chocolate bar, which constituted the measure of healthy food choice. Participants then were fully debriefed. Results and discussion The results supported our predictions. Participants who completed the study in the orderly room donated more than twice as much as those who completed the study in the disorderly room (M = €3.19, SD = 3.01, vs. M = €1.29, SD = 1.76), (32) = 2.24, p = .03, d = 0.73. Fully 82% of participants in the orderly room donated some money, versus 47% in the disorderly room, x(1, N = 34) = 4.64, p < .04, q = .37. Also as predicted, participants in the orderly room chose the apple (over the chocolate) more often than those in the disorderly room' (M = 67% vs. M = 20%), x°(1, N = 30) = 6.65, p< .05, o = .44. The results confirmed the prediction that an orderly (vs. disorderly) environment leads to more desirable, normatively good behaviors. Sitting in a tidy room led to healthier food choices and greater financial support of a charitable institution, relative to sitting in a cluttered room.
Transcribed Image Text:1862 Vobs et al. spent the same amount of time (10 min) in the orderly or disorderly environment. Next, participants were presented with an opportunity to donate to a charity. They learned that the department in which the study was being conducted supports a char- ity that supplies children with toys and books (Fennis, Janssen, & Vohs, 2009). Participants wrote the amount, if any, they chose to donate on a sheet of paper, which they placed into a sealed envelope (so that self-presenta- tion concerns would be dispelled). The researcher then discussed the concepts measured in the filler questionnaires as a partial debriefing. Upon exiting, participants were allowed to take an apple or chocolate bar, which constituted the measure of healthy food choice. Participants then were fully debriefed. Results and discussion The results supported our predictions. Participants who completed the study in the orderly room donated more than twice as much as those who completed the study in the disorderly room (M = €3.19, SD = 3.01, vs. M = €1.29, SD = 1.76), (32) = 2.24, p = .03, d = 0.73. Fully 82% of participants in the orderly room donated some money, versus 47% in the disorderly room, x(1, N = 34) = 4.64, p < .04, q = .37. Also as predicted, participants in the orderly room chose the apple (over the chocolate) more often than those in the disorderly room' (M = 67% vs. M = 20%), x°(1, N = 30) = 6.65, p< .05, o = .44. The results confirmed the prediction that an orderly (vs. disorderly) environment leads to more desirable, normatively good behaviors. Sitting in a tidy room led to healthier food choices and greater financial support of a charitable institution, relative to sitting in a cluttered room.
Physical Orderliness Changes Decisions and Behavior 1861 Experiment 1: Environmental Order Encourages Healthy Choices and Charitable Donations Experiment 1 tested whether physical order would pro- mote healthy choices and charitable behavior, On the basis of hints in the literature that convention is associ- ated with healthy eating (Roberts et al., 2009) and cleanli- ness with giving (Liljenquist et al., 2010), we predicted that people placed in an orderly environment would be more likely to choose a healthy snack over an unhealthy snack than would people placed in a disorderly environ- ment and that they would also donate more money to charity. Method Participants and design. Thirty-four Dutch students participated. They were randomly assigned to an orderly or a disorderly condition. Procedure. We manipulated environmental orderliness by having participants complete the study in an orderly or disorderly room (Fig. 1). The rooms were adjacent (and therefore had the same sunlight exposure and view), and they had the same size and configuration. The main difference was their orderliness. The disorderly room had papers and common office items scattered throughout the work space. The orderly room had no clutter. Participants first were told that they would receive €3 for participating. Then they completed unrelated filler questionnaires intended to ensure that all participants Orderly Disorderly Fig. 1. The rooms used in the orderly (left) and disorderly (right) conditions of Experiment 1.
Transcribed Image Text:Physical Orderliness Changes Decisions and Behavior 1861 Experiment 1: Environmental Order Encourages Healthy Choices and Charitable Donations Experiment 1 tested whether physical order would pro- mote healthy choices and charitable behavior, On the basis of hints in the literature that convention is associ- ated with healthy eating (Roberts et al., 2009) and cleanli- ness with giving (Liljenquist et al., 2010), we predicted that people placed in an orderly environment would be more likely to choose a healthy snack over an unhealthy snack than would people placed in a disorderly environ- ment and that they would also donate more money to charity. Method Participants and design. Thirty-four Dutch students participated. They were randomly assigned to an orderly or a disorderly condition. Procedure. We manipulated environmental orderliness by having participants complete the study in an orderly or disorderly room (Fig. 1). The rooms were adjacent (and therefore had the same sunlight exposure and view), and they had the same size and configuration. The main difference was their orderliness. The disorderly room had papers and common office items scattered throughout the work space. The orderly room had no clutter. Participants first were told that they would receive €3 for participating. Then they completed unrelated filler questionnaires intended to ensure that all participants Orderly Disorderly Fig. 1. The rooms used in the orderly (left) and disorderly (right) conditions of Experiment 1.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780134477961
Author:
Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:
PEARSON
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337408271
Author:
Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337565691
Author:
Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780393265156
Author:
Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Psychology
ISBN:
9781285763880
Author:
E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:
9781305652958
Author:
Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS