Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
Please analyze these thee documents on the prompt: How effective were unions, business leaders and the government at improving the daily life and work situation of the working class in the urban areas between the years 1880 to 1910? Feel free to include other details (contextualization) Please keep this in mind: Analysis and Reasoning, Complexity, Historical Reasoning, evidence that supports the prompt (can be paraphrased but please cite)-- make connections to the claim and thesis Claim is that the unions and business leaders and the government is somewhat effective at improving the daily life and work situation of the working class in the urban areas between the years 1880 to 1910. Please help me with three pieces of information for my thesis: Although ______________, ultimately __________________________.

Please analyze these thee documents on the prompt: How effective were unions, business leaders and the government at improving the daily life and work situation of the working class in the urban areas between the years 1880 to 1910? Feel free to include other details (contextualization) Please keep this in mind: Analysis and Reasoning, Complexity, Historical Reasoning, evidence that supports the prompt (can be paraphrased but please cite)-- make connections to the claim and thesis Claim is that the unions and business leaders and the government is somewhat effective at improving the daily life and work situation of the working class in the urban areas between the years 1880 to 1910. Please help me with three pieces of information for my thesis: Although ______________, ultimately __________________________.

icon
Related questions
Question

Please analyze these thee documents on the prompt: How effective were unions, business leaders and the government at improving the daily life and work situation of the working class in the urban areas between the years 1880 to 1910?

Feel free to include other details (contextualization)

Please keep this in mind: Analysis and Reasoning, Complexity, Historical Reasoning, evidence that supports the prompt (can be paraphrased but please cite)-- make connections to the claim and thesis

Claim is that the unions and business leaders and the government is somewhat effective at improving the daily life and work situation of the working class in the urban areas between the years 1880 to 1910.

Please help me with three pieces of information for my thesis: Although ______________, ultimately __________________________.

Prompt: How effective were unions, business leaders and the government at improving the daily life and work situation of the working class in the urban areas between the years 1880 to 1910? Document 1: It is true that wealth has been greatly increased, and that the average of comfort, leisure, and refinement has been raised; but these gains are not general. In them the lowest class do not share, I do not mean that the condition of the lowest class has nowhere nor in anything been improved; but that there is nowhere any improvement which can be credited to increased productive power. I mean that the tendency of what we call material progress is in nowise to improve the condition of the lowest class in the essentials of healthy, happy human life. Nay, more, that it is still further to depress the condition of the lowest class. The new forces, elevating in their nature though they be, do not act upon the social fabric from underneath, as was for a long time hoped and believed, but strike it at a point intermediate between top and bottom. It is as though an immense wedge were being forced, not underneath society, but through society. Those who are above the point of separation are clevated, but those who are below are crushed down, Source: Progress and Poverty (1879) by Henry George Document 2: This, then, is held to be the duty of the man of wealth: To set an example of modest, unostentatious living, shunning display or extravagance; to provide moderately for the legitimate wants of those dependent upon him; and, after doing so, to consider all surplus revenues which come to him simply as trust funds, which he is called upon to administer, and strictly bound as a matter of duty to administer in the manner which, in his judgment, is best calculated to produce the most beneficial results for the community-the man of wealth thus becoming the mere trustee and agent for his poorer brethren, bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience, and ability to administer, doing for them better than they would or could do for them selves.... In bestowing charity, the main consideration should be to help those who will help themselves; to provide part of the means by which those who desire to improve may do so; to give those who desire to rise the aids by which they may rise; to assist, but rarcly or never to do all. Neither the individual nor the race is improved by alms giving. Those worthy of assistance, except in rare cases, seldom require assistance. ... Source: Gospel of Wealth (1889 ) by Andrew Carnegie Document 3: Source: Historical Statistics of the United States HOURS AND WAGES OF INDUSTRIAL WORKERS 1875-1891 INDEX OF AVERAGE AVERAGE DAILY DAILY WAGES HOURS (January 1860 = 100) 1875 9.9 169 2 1876 1877 9.9 158.6 9.9 146.3 1878 9.9 140.7 1879 9.9 137.9 142.7 1880 9.9 1881 9.9 160.1 1882 9.9 165.1 1883 9.9 166.0 1884 9.9 168.5 1885 9.9 169.9 1886 9.8 170.3 1887 9.7 170.1 1888 1889 9.7 170.9 9.6 170.1 1890 9.6 172.7 1891 9.4 1725
Transcribed Image Text:Prompt: How effective were unions, business leaders and the government at improving the daily life and work situation of the working class in the urban areas between the years 1880 to 1910? Document 1: It is true that wealth has been greatly increased, and that the average of comfort, leisure, and refinement has been raised; but these gains are not general. In them the lowest class do not share, I do not mean that the condition of the lowest class has nowhere nor in anything been improved; but that there is nowhere any improvement which can be credited to increased productive power. I mean that the tendency of what we call material progress is in nowise to improve the condition of the lowest class in the essentials of healthy, happy human life. Nay, more, that it is still further to depress the condition of the lowest class. The new forces, elevating in their nature though they be, do not act upon the social fabric from underneath, as was for a long time hoped and believed, but strike it at a point intermediate between top and bottom. It is as though an immense wedge were being forced, not underneath society, but through society. Those who are above the point of separation are clevated, but those who are below are crushed down, Source: Progress and Poverty (1879) by Henry George Document 2: This, then, is held to be the duty of the man of wealth: To set an example of modest, unostentatious living, shunning display or extravagance; to provide moderately for the legitimate wants of those dependent upon him; and, after doing so, to consider all surplus revenues which come to him simply as trust funds, which he is called upon to administer, and strictly bound as a matter of duty to administer in the manner which, in his judgment, is best calculated to produce the most beneficial results for the community-the man of wealth thus becoming the mere trustee and agent for his poorer brethren, bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience, and ability to administer, doing for them better than they would or could do for them selves.... In bestowing charity, the main consideration should be to help those who will help themselves; to provide part of the means by which those who desire to improve may do so; to give those who desire to rise the aids by which they may rise; to assist, but rarcly or never to do all. Neither the individual nor the race is improved by alms giving. Those worthy of assistance, except in rare cases, seldom require assistance. ... Source: Gospel of Wealth (1889 ) by Andrew Carnegie Document 3: Source: Historical Statistics of the United States HOURS AND WAGES OF INDUSTRIAL WORKERS 1875-1891 INDEX OF AVERAGE AVERAGE DAILY DAILY WAGES HOURS (January 1860 = 100) 1875 9.9 169 2 1876 1877 9.9 158.6 9.9 146.3 1878 9.9 140.7 1879 9.9 137.9 142.7 1880 9.9 1881 9.9 160.1 1882 9.9 165.1 1883 9.9 166.0 1884 9.9 168.5 1885 9.9 169.9 1886 9.8 170.3 1887 9.7 170.1 1888 1889 9.7 170.9 9.6 170.1 1890 9.6 172.7 1891 9.4 1725
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer