Part Il: Determination of Standard SolutionsmL of 0.200mL H20addedM Cuso,dilutedTube #M Cuso4-5H20 addedAbsorbanceabout 30.2001.3463.4.001.000.94543.002.000.7152.003.000.4696.1.004.000.281show calculation for Tube #3 diluted concentration:

In the given question, the molarity of CuSO4 solution needs to be determined from the given data.

Part Il: Determination of Standard Solutions mL of 0.200 mL H20 added Tube # M Cuso, M CusO4-5 H20 added diluted Absorbance about 3 0.200 1.346 3. 4.00 1.00 0.945 4 3.00 2.00 0.715 5. 2.00 3.00 0.469 6. 1.00 4.00 0.281 show calculation for Tube #3 diluted concentration:

Part Il: Determination of Standard Solutions mL of 0.200 mL H20 added Tube # M Cuso, M CusO4-5 H20 added diluted Absorbance about 3 0.200 1.346 3. 4.00 1.00 0.945 4 3.00 2.00 0.715 5. 2.00 3.00 0.469 6. 1.00 4.00 0.281 show calculation for Tube #3 diluted concentration:

Chemistry

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305957404

Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Chapter1: Chemical Foundations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

3.) A standard reference FeSCN2+ solution (0.020 M) has an absorbance 1.070. What is the concentration of an %D unkown FeSCN2+ solution that has an absorbance 0.387. unknown [FESCN²+]
A 0.5264-g sample containing KBr is dissolved in 50 mL distilled water. Titrating with 0.04738 M AgNO3 requires 24.57 mL to reach the Mohr endpoint. A blank titration requires 0.75 mL to reach the same endpoint. Report the % (w/w) KBr (MM = 119.0) in the sample. 26.19% 51.02 % 12.76 % 25.51 %
Whats the right choice
help please answer in text form with proper workings and explanation for each and every part and steps with concept and introduction no AI no copy paste remember answer must be in proper format with all working
Acid-Base titration: Standardization of 0.1 M NAOH Trial 1 Mass KHP used, g 0.297 g Final reading Volume NaOH, mL 15.59 mL Initial reading Volume NaOH, mL 0.23 mL Volume NaOH consumed, mL 15.36 mL Moles KHP used Moles NaOH used Molarity of NaOH solution
SCE students measured the concentration of HCl in a solution by titrating with different indicators to find the end point.Indicator Mean HCl concentration (M)(± standard deviation)Number of measurementsBromothymol blue 0.09565 ± 0.00225 28Methyl red 0.08686 ± 0.00098 18Bromocresol green 0.08641 ± 0.00113 29Is the difference between indicators 1 and 2 significant at the 95% confidence level? Answer the same question for indicators 2 and 3
Hello, I'm working on the table for the Absorbance Values of the Cobalt Nitrate Solutions. I'm trying to figure out the Value of k. For Example: Concentration A (1) A (2) Average A Value of k 0.0200M 0.262 0.269 0.3965 ?? 0.400M 0.268 0.311 0.4235 ?? 0.0600M 0.194 0.207 0.2975 0.0800M 0.435 0.462 0.666 Average k value_______________ Thank you,
3. Titration: Strong Acid / Weak Base. (I warned you to be ready!) Here's the cool chart! Analyte: 20.00 mL 0.100 M Hydrazine (N₂H4) Hd A: initial Vertical (Value) Axis Title 0 B: half equivalence C: equivalence 5 10 15 20 Titrant: mL of 0.100 M HCI added 25 20.00 mL of 0.100 M hydrazine (N₂H4, pKb = 5.77) is titrated with 0.100 M HCl. a) Find the initial pH (point A) and the pH at the equivalence point (point C). b) Find the pH at the half equivalence point (point B).
When the conductivity is at a minimum, what must be true about the amount of Ba(OH)2?
45.0 mL of an unknown FeCl3 solution is diluted to a total volume of 230.0 mL. The diluted FeCl3 solution measured an absorbance of 0.223. Calculate the molarity of the undiluted unknown FeCl3 solution if the molar extinction coefficient is 230.0 M-1⋅cm-1 and a path length of 1.00 cm.
If the absorbance of one of the buffer solutions was 0.123 and the absorbance of the basic solution was 0.687, what is the value for the [X²]/[HX] ratio? Report your answer with 3 decimal places. Your Answer: Answer
If a student used the molar mass of magnesium to calculate the concentration in parts per million (ppm) of a manganese stock standard solution, would the reported weight percent of manganese in a subsequent unknown, that was compared colorimetrically, be higher, lower, or not change?