One year at a university, the algebra course director decided to experiment with a new teaching method that might reduce variability in final-exam scores by eliminating lower scores. The director randomly divided the algebra st who were registered for class at 9:40 A.M. into two groups. One of the groups, called the control group, was taught the usual algebra course; the other group, called the experimental group, was taught by the new teaching meth classes covered the same material, took the same unit quizzes, and took the same final exam at the same time. The final-exam scores (out of 40 possible) for the two groups are shown in the accompanying table. Find a 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the population standard deviations of final-exam scores for students taught by the conventional method and for students taught by the new method. Assume that both populations are normally distributed. (Note: s, =7.637, s2 = 7.240, and for df = (19,40), Fo.05 = 1.85.) Click here to view the data table. Click here to view page 1 of the F-distribution. Click here to view page 2 of the F-distribution. Click here to view page 3 of the F-distribution. Click here to view page 4 of the F-distribution. is 0.74 to 1.44. 02 The 90% confidence interval for

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

Interpret the confidence interval. Select the correct choice below and fill in the answer boxes to complete your choice.

Can you assist me on how the assignment chose 1.35 as the answer for the question? I was able to calculate the confidence interval for part A, but don't understand the second part. Thank you so much in advance.

**Transcription for Educational Website:**

---

**Problem 11.2.69**

One year at a university, the algebra course director decided to experiment with a new teaching method that might reduce variability in final-exam scores by eliminating lower scores. The director randomly divided the algebra students who were registered for class at 9:40 A.M. into two groups. One of the groups, called the control group, was taught the usual algebra course; the other group, called the experimental group, was taught by the new teaching method. Both classes covered the same material, took the same unit quizzes, and took the same final exam at the same time. The final-exam scores (out of 40 possible) for the two groups are shown in the accompanying tables. Find a 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the population standard deviations of final-exam scores for students taught by the conventional method and for students taught by the new method. Assume that both populations are normally distributed. (Note: s₁ = 7.637, s₂ = 7.240, and for df = (19, 19), F₀.₀₅ = 1.85.)

- Click here to view the data table.
- Click here to view page 1 of the F-distribution.
- Click here to view page 2 of the F-distribution.
- Click here to view page 3 of the F-distribution.
- Click here to view page 4 of the F-distribution.

---

The 90% confidence interval for \(\frac{\sigma_1}{\sigma_2}\) is \(0.74\) to \(1.44\).

**(Round to two decimal places as needed.)**

**Interpret the confidence interval. Select the correct choice below and fill in the answer boxes to complete your choice.  
(Round to two decimal places as needed.)**

- A. We can be 90% confident that the population standard deviation final-exam score for students taught by the conventional method is somewhere between \[ \] and \[ \] times greater than for those taught by the new method.

- B. We can be 90% confident that the population standard deviation final-exam score for students taught by the conventional method is somewhere between 1.35 times less than and 1.44 times greater than for those taught by the new method.

- C. We can be 90% confident that
Transcribed Image Text:**Transcription for Educational Website:** --- **Problem 11.2.69** One year at a university, the algebra course director decided to experiment with a new teaching method that might reduce variability in final-exam scores by eliminating lower scores. The director randomly divided the algebra students who were registered for class at 9:40 A.M. into two groups. One of the groups, called the control group, was taught the usual algebra course; the other group, called the experimental group, was taught by the new teaching method. Both classes covered the same material, took the same unit quizzes, and took the same final exam at the same time. The final-exam scores (out of 40 possible) for the two groups are shown in the accompanying tables. Find a 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the population standard deviations of final-exam scores for students taught by the conventional method and for students taught by the new method. Assume that both populations are normally distributed. (Note: s₁ = 7.637, s₂ = 7.240, and for df = (19, 19), F₀.₀₅ = 1.85.) - Click here to view the data table. - Click here to view page 1 of the F-distribution. - Click here to view page 2 of the F-distribution. - Click here to view page 3 of the F-distribution. - Click here to view page 4 of the F-distribution. --- The 90% confidence interval for \(\frac{\sigma_1}{\sigma_2}\) is \(0.74\) to \(1.44\). **(Round to two decimal places as needed.)** **Interpret the confidence interval. Select the correct choice below and fill in the answer boxes to complete your choice. (Round to two decimal places as needed.)** - A. We can be 90% confident that the population standard deviation final-exam score for students taught by the conventional method is somewhere between \[ \] and \[ \] times greater than for those taught by the new method. - B. We can be 90% confident that the population standard deviation final-exam score for students taught by the conventional method is somewhere between 1.35 times less than and 1.44 times greater than for those taught by the new method. - C. We can be 90% confident that
### Data Table

#### Overview
This table displays collected data from a control group and an experimental group. Both groups have multiple readings organized in columns, which may represent steps in a study or results from different observations.

#### Control Group

- **Readings**:
  - Row 1: 38, 38, 37, 36
  - Row 2: 36, 35, 34, 33
  - Row 3: 28, 27, 27, 27
  - Row 4: 25, 25, 25, 25
  - Row 5: 24, 23, 22, 22
  - Row 6: 18, 18, 18, 17
  - Row 7: 15, 15, 14, 14, 13

#### Experimental Group

- **Readings**:
  - Row 1: 39, 37, 36, 36
  - Row 2: 35, 35, 33, 33
  - Row 3: 32, 28, 26, 25
  - Row 4: 25, 24, 24, 23
  - Row 5: 19, 18, 17, 17

#### Analysis
The data suggests comparative observations which may indicate differences between the control and experimental conditions. The readings provide a basis for statistical analysis to determine if there are significant changes or patterns according to the variables being tested.

#### Graphs/Diagrams
This section includes no visual graphs or diagrams. Data interpretation relies on numerical comparison and statistical analysis.
Transcribed Image Text:### Data Table #### Overview This table displays collected data from a control group and an experimental group. Both groups have multiple readings organized in columns, which may represent steps in a study or results from different observations. #### Control Group - **Readings**: - Row 1: 38, 38, 37, 36 - Row 2: 36, 35, 34, 33 - Row 3: 28, 27, 27, 27 - Row 4: 25, 25, 25, 25 - Row 5: 24, 23, 22, 22 - Row 6: 18, 18, 18, 17 - Row 7: 15, 15, 14, 14, 13 #### Experimental Group - **Readings**: - Row 1: 39, 37, 36, 36 - Row 2: 35, 35, 33, 33 - Row 3: 32, 28, 26, 25 - Row 4: 25, 24, 24, 23 - Row 5: 19, 18, 17, 17 #### Analysis The data suggests comparative observations which may indicate differences between the control and experimental conditions. The readings provide a basis for statistical analysis to determine if there are significant changes or patterns according to the variables being tested. #### Graphs/Diagrams This section includes no visual graphs or diagrams. Data interpretation relies on numerical comparison and statistical analysis.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Point Estimation, Limit Theorems, Approximations, and Bounds
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman