One of the following statements about the theory of economic games is not correct. Select the one answer that is false. Select one: Each player's most preferred scenario in a prisoners' dilemma game is to free ride. O Looking for dominant strategies will identify all equilibria in a game. O In a dominant strategy equilibrium, no player has an incentive to unilaterally change their strategy. In a Nash equilibrium, no player has an incentive to unilaterally change their strategy.

One of the following statements about the theory of economic games is not correct. Select the one answer that is false. Select one: Each player's most preferred scenario in a prisoners' dilemma game is to free ride. O Looking for dominant strategies will identify all equilibria in a game. O In a dominant strategy equilibrium, no player has an incentive to unilaterally change their strategy. In a Nash equilibrium, no player has an incentive to unilaterally change their strategy.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2
Please no written by hand and no emage
The childhood game of Rock–Paper–Scissors is shown in the accompanying figure. Show that each player’s assigning equal probability to his or her three pure strategies is a symmetric Nash equilibrium.
Consider the extensive form game portrayed below. The top number at aterminal node is player 1’s payoff, the middle number is player 2’s payoff,and the bottom number is player 3’s payoff.a. Derive the strategy set for each player. (Note: If you do not want to listall of the strategies, you can provide a general description of a player’sstrategy, give an example, and state how many strategies are in thestrategy set.)b. Derive all subgame perfect Nash equilibria. c. Derive a Nash equilibrium that is not a SPNE, and explain why it isnot a SPNE.
a) Draw an extensive form game with 4 outcomes (2 moves for player 1 followed by 2 moves for 2 after each of 1's moves) and no pure strategy Nash equilibrium. b) Write the strategic form to verify your answer to (a) c) Draw an extensive form 2-player game, in which both players always move, that has exactly 4 outcomes, 1 subgame perfect Nash equilibrium and no non-subgame perfect Nash equilibrium and no dominant strategies. d) Write the strategic form and use it to verify your answer to (b)
2. Consider the following game: u 1 r 6,0 0,6 d 3,2 6,0 Are there any Nash equilibria in pure strategies for this game? Find the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium.
Consider the following game : Stag Rabbit Stag 9, 9 0, 8 Rabbit 8, 0 7, 7 The first payoff is that of player 1 and the second that of player 2. a. ) Draw the extensive form of the simultaneous game. Find all the Nash equilibrium. p. Suppose player 1 moves first or we are in a sequential game now. Draw the extensive form in the sequential version. c. What is the subgame perfect Nash Equilibrium (SPNE) in the sequential version? d. ) Explain why it is an SPNE.
Which of the following statements about Nash Equilibria in a two-player one-shot simultaneous game is FALSE? O If one player has a dominant strategy, a Nash Equilibrium is guaranteed. O If both players have a dominant strategy, a Nash Equilibrium is guaranteed. O A Nash Equilibrium is conditional on at least one player having a dominant strategy. O It is possible for a game in pure strategies to not have a Nash Equilibrium. It is possible for a two-person game to have more than two Nash Equilibria.
Which of the following DOES NOT accurately describe a Nash equilibrium? O It is the set of strategies which provides the players with the highest possible combined payoffs. All of these choices accurately describe a Nash equilibrium. O It is a set of strategies such that no player can receive a higher payoff by changing only their own strategy. It is a set of strategies such that no player, after seeing what the other players' strategies were, regrets their choice of strategy. It is a set of strategies such that every player, after seeing what the other players' strategies were, is satisfied (if not actually happy) with their choice of strategy.
Two farmers have unlimited access to a common plot of land and can let their cows graze on it. The matrix below shows the benefits they get from grazing either 1 or 2+ cows on the land. Farmer 2 Farmer1 1 cow 2+ cows 1 cow 8,8 2,10 2+cows 10,2 4,4 What kind of game is this? What is/are the Nash equilibrium/equilibria? What is/are the Pareto efficient outcome(s) in this game? (Hint: Remember that Pareto efficiency occurs when no one person can be made better off without someone else being made worse off) The government offers a reward or subsidy for communities where farmers only allow 1 cow to graze on the common field, resulting in a new payoff matrix:…
None
Up ооооо Down Player 1 Up No EFFICIENT equilibrium exists Down Up Down Player 2 P1 gets $120 P2 gets $5 P1 gets $100 P2 gets $10 P1 gets $95 P2 gets $95 In the game above, what is/are the EFFICIENT sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? (up,up) (up,down) (down, up) (down, down) P1 gets $15 P2 gets $25