On January 15, 2018, a corporation was granted a patent on a product. On January 2, 2020, to protect its patent, the corporation purchased a patent on a competing product that originally was issued on January 10, 2016. Because of its unique plant, the corporation does not feel the competing patent can be used in producing a product. The cost of the competing patent should be Amortized over a maximum period of 17 years Amortized over a maximum period of 13 years Amortized over a maximum period of 9 years Expensed in 2020

On January 15, 2018, a corporation was granted a patent on a product. On January 2, 2020, to protect its patent, the corporation purchased a patent on a competing product that originally was issued on January 10, 2016. Because of its unique plant, the corporation does not feel the competing patent can be used in producing a product. The cost of the competing patent should be Amortized over a maximum period of 17 years Amortized over a maximum period of 13 years Amortized over a maximum period of 9 years Expensed in 2020

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

On January 2, 2023, Blossom Corp. bought a trademark from Cullumber Inc. for $117000. An independent research company estimated that the remaining useful life of the trademark was 25 years. At this time, the trademark's net book value in Cullumber's records was $174000. Because the trademark had a demonstrated limited life beyond 25 years, Blossom decided to amortize the trademark over the maximum period, straight-line with no residual. In Blossom's (calendar) 2023 income statement, what amount should be reported as amortization expense for this trademark? O $6492 O $6960 O $4680 O $5850
On January 1, 2022, Proton, Inc. purchased a patent giving it exclusive rights to manufacture a new type of synthetic clothing for P240,000. While the patent had a remaining legal life of 15 years at the time of purchase, Proton expects the useful life to be only eight more years. In addition, Proton purchased equipment related to production of the new clothing for P140,000. The equipment has a physical life of 10 years but Proton plans to use the equipment only over the patent's service life and then sell it for an estimated P20,000. Proton uses straight-line for all long-term assets. The amount charged to expense in 2022 related to the patent and equipment should be: O P40,000. P31,000. O P38,000. O P45,000.
Presented below is selected information for Sandhill Company. Answer the questions asked about each of the factual situations. (Do not leave any answer field blank. Enter O for amounts.) (a) On January 1, 2017, Sandhill incurred organization costs of $265,000. What amount of organization expense should be reported in 2017? Amount to be reported $ (b) Sandhill bought a franchise from Carla Vista Co. on January 1, 2016, for $190,000. The carrying amount of the franchise on Carla Vista's books on January 1, 2016, was $238,00O. The franchise agreement had an estimated useful life of 10 years. Because Sandhill must enter a competitive bidding at the end of 2018, it is unlikely that the franchise will be retained beyond 2025. What amount should be amortized for the year ended December 31, 2017? Amount to be amortized $ %24
In May 2019, Colt Company filed suit against Johnson Company seeking P1,900,000 damages for patent infringement. A court verdict in November 2019 awarded Colt Company P1,500,000 in damages, but Johnson Company's appeal is not expected to be decided before 2020. The legal counsel believed it is probable that Colt Company will be successful against Johnson Company for an estimated amount in the range between P800,000 and P1,100,000, with P1,000,000 considered the most likely amount. What amount should Colt Company record as income from the lawsuit for the December 31, 2019? year ended
Show the solution in good accounting form
Larkspur Limited purchased a patent for $86,400 on June 1, 2022. Larkspur has a calendar fiscal year end. Straight-line amortization is used for the patent, based on a five-year useful life, although the remaining legal life was 10 years. On May 31, 2024, Larkspur paid $28,800 in legal fees to successfully defend this patent in court and now wants to revise the estimate of the patent's remaining useful life to 8 years, which is the same as its remaining legal life. (a) (b) (c) (d) Record any necessary amortization prior to the change in the useful life of the patent. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when the amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry for the account titles and enter O for the amounts. List debit entry before credit entry)
On January 1, 2018, Don Company purchased a patent from an original patentee for 2,400,000. The remaining legal life of the patent is 15 years but the useful life is only 12 years. On January 1, 2019, the entity paid 550,000 in successfully defending the patent in an infringement suit files against the entity. On January 1, 2020, the entity acquired a competing patent for 1,500,000. The competing patent has a remaining legal life of 15 years but it is not to be used because it was intended to protect the original patent. What is the carrying amount of the patent on Dec 31, 2020? Question 33 options: 3,150,000 3,600,000 3,200,000 3,500,000
Carla Vista Corporation purchased a patent for $12750 on September 1, 2019. It had a useful life of 10 years. On January 1, 2021, Carla Vista spent $28000 to successfully defend the patent in a lawsuit. Carla Vista feels that as of that date, the remaining useful life is 5 years. What amount should be reported for patent amortization expense for 2021? $27700. $28550. $22100. $26000.
Sandhill Corporation purchased a patent for $147000 on September 1, 2024. It had a useful life of 10 years. On January 1, 2026, Sandhill spent $41000 to successfully defend the patent in a lawsuit. Sandhill feels that as of that date, the remaining useful life is 5 years. What amount should be reported for patent amortization expense at the company's December 31, 2026 year-end if the straight-line method is used? O $25480. O $33680. O $31720. O $34660.
Sydney, Inc., a manufacturer of chocolate-coated mint candy acquired a patent on June 25, 2018, for 720,000. Management expects that the patent will be useful to the company for its remaining useful life of 10 years. On January 10, 2020, the company spent 120,000 in successfully defending the patent against a competitor. In 2021, management determines that the estimated remaining life of the patent should be reduced to only five years, including the current year. The company’s policy is to amortize the cost of Intangible assets using the straight-line method to the nearest month.What is the amortization expense for the year 2021? A. 72,000 B. 108,000 C. 129,000 D. 126,000
1. Pharoah purchased a patent from Vania Co. for $2,700,000 on January 1, 2018. The patent is being amortized over its remaining legal life of 10 years, expiring on January 1, 2028. During 2020, Pharoah determined that the economic benefits of the patent would not last longer than 7 years from the date of acquisition. What amount should be reported in the balance sheet for the patent, net of accumulated amortization, at December 31, 2020? The amount to be reported 2$ 2. Pharoah bought a franchise from Alexander Co. on January 1, 2019, for $979,000. The carrying amount of the franchise on Alexander's books on January 1, 2019, was $635,000. The franchise agreement had an estimated useful life of 20 years. Because Pharoah must enter a competitive bidding at the end of 2028, it is unlikely that the franchise will be retained beyond 2028. What amount should be amortized for the year ended December 31, 2020? The amount to be amortized 3. On January 1, 2020, Pharoah incurred organization…
During the 2021/2022 financial year, the company had following events. On 1 April 2022, ABC Industry purchased additional 30,000 allowances on the market as the initially granted emission allowances seemed insufficient to settle their obligations (emission liabilities). On this date, the fair value of an allowance was $60. 1) How to recognise the Purchased emission allowances? As an intangible asset, inventory, debtor? Your team need to explain why the emission allowances should be recognised as such.