ometimes there is a question asked about why native americans, if they were "developed", did not fight back and defeat the european arrivals. Within this, there are two images: one: native americans were weaker and thus were "undeveloped" relative to europeans and two: that they were passive and failed to resist. After reading these sections, how accurate is that representation? Did people just passively accept Columbus, Cortez, and DeSoto? How did various people respond? How can we understand those responses?
ometimes there is a question asked about why native americans, if they were "developed", did not fight back and defeat the european arrivals. Within this, there are two images: one: native americans were weaker and thus were "undeveloped" relative to europeans and two: that they were passive and failed to resist. After reading these sections, how accurate is that representation? Did people just passively accept Columbus, Cortez, and DeSoto? How did various people respond? How can we understand those responses?
Related questions
Question
Sometimes there is a question asked about why native americans, if they were "developed", did not fight back and defeat the european arrivals. Within this, there are two images: one: native americans were weaker and thus were "undeveloped" relative to europeans and two: that they were passive and failed to resist. After reading these sections, how accurate is that representation? Did people just passively accept Columbus, Cortez, and DeSoto? How did various people respond? How can we understand those responses?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
