Olbers’s paradox deals with which of these questions? a.Is the universe accelerating? b.Why is the sky dark at night? c.Is the universe expanding? d.Why does the sun shine so brightly? e.none of the above

Olbers’ paradox deals with: b. Why is the sky dark at night?

Answered: Olbers’s paradox deals with which of…

Similar questions

Does Hubble's Law work well for galaxies in the Local Group (such as Andromeda)? No, because dark energy is accelerating the universe's expansion over those distances. No, because we do not know the precise value of Ho. No, because Hubble did not know the Local Group existed when he discovered his law. Yes, it works well for all galaxies. No, because galaxies in the Local Group are bound gravitationally together.
Your friends are talking about Olber's Paradox: Friend 1: When the universe was quite young, it was also quite small, and therefore light was trapped inside the universe. This is why we don't see light from the edge of the universe in every direction. Friend 2: No, Olber's Paradox describes only light from stars, not from galaxies, and why you can't use light from distant stars to see at night. Friend 3: You're both right and you're both wrong. The paradox concerns itself with the expansion of the universe, and explains why light from the early universe was able to be released. Are any of them right, in part or in whole?
Scientists claim that empty space has an undetectable form of energy known as “dark energy.” This theory is needed to explain wich of the following? * A) The galaxies in the universe are getting brighter. B) The universe is heating up. C) The universe is expanding at an increasing speed. D) The stars and planets in the universe are getting louder.
Over the lifetime of the Universe, the dynamics of its expansion are dominated by the density of different constituents at different times. Ignoring expansion, what is the proper order for which constituent dominates from early to later times? Select one: a. First matter, then dark energy, then radiation b. First radiation, then matter, then dark energy c. First dark energy, then radiation, then matter d. First radiation, then dark energy, then matter
Need help, need to know if I'm doing this right
Which of the following can be concluded from the two premises below: 1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause 2. The universe began to exist some 14 billion years ago a. the universe must have a cause b. nothing c. the universe caused itself d. there must be a multiverse

	a.	Is the universe accelerating?
	b.	Why is the sky dark at night?
	c.	Is the universe expanding?
	d.	Why does the sun shine so brightly?
	e.	none of the above

Olbers’s paradox deals with which of these questions? a. Is the universe accelerating? b. Why is the sky dark at night? c. Is the universe expanding? d. Why does the sun shine so brightly? e. none of the above