Number of police killings of unarmed black Americanst p value Wild cluster bootstrap-t p value Any police killings of unarmed black Americans (vs none)t p value Wild cluster bootstrap-t p value Primary outcome Poor mental health days (OLS, rate difference) 0-14 (0-07-0.22) 0-00047 <0.0001 0-35 (0-03-0-67) 0-032 <0.0001 Poor mental health days (Poisson, rate ratio) 1-033 (1-016-1-051) 0.00011 <0.0001 1.087 (1-006-1-174) 0-035 <0.0001 Secondary outcomes Any poor mental health days (Poisson, risk ratio) 1-022 (1-008-1-036) 0.0018 <0.0001 1-055 (1-007-1-106) 0-024 <0.0001 Frequent mental distress* (Poisson, risk ratio) 1.036 (1-007-1-068) 0.016 <0.0001 1-106 (0-986-1-240) 0-085 0-039 Data are regression estimates (95% CI). All outcomes were assessed on the 103 710 black American respondents in the 2013-15 US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Separate regressions were done for the two exposures (number of killings and any killings); additionally, each column represents a separate regression. 95% Cls are corrected for clustering at the state level. All models were adjusted for respondent sex, age group, and level of education; and state-survey month, survey year-survey month, and survey day of week fixed effects. OLS-ordinary least squares. *Defined as 14 days or more of poor mental in the past 30 days. †Exposures are measured in the 30 days before the interview date. #Wild cluster bootstrap-t p values account for potential underestimates of SEs when the number of clusters is small. These were estimated on least-squares (ie, linear probability model) versions of the models listed because they cannot be applied to non-linear estimators (eg, Poisson). Table 3: Exposure to police killings of unarmed black Americans and poor mental health days among black Americans: regression estimates
Number of police killings of unarmed black Americanst p value Wild cluster bootstrap-t p value Any police killings of unarmed black Americans (vs none)t p value Wild cluster bootstrap-t p value Primary outcome Poor mental health days (OLS, rate difference) 0-14 (0-07-0.22) 0-00047 <0.0001 0-35 (0-03-0-67) 0-032 <0.0001 Poor mental health days (Poisson, rate ratio) 1-033 (1-016-1-051) 0.00011 <0.0001 1.087 (1-006-1-174) 0-035 <0.0001 Secondary outcomes Any poor mental health days (Poisson, risk ratio) 1-022 (1-008-1-036) 0.0018 <0.0001 1-055 (1-007-1-106) 0-024 <0.0001 Frequent mental distress* (Poisson, risk ratio) 1.036 (1-007-1-068) 0.016 <0.0001 1-106 (0-986-1-240) 0-085 0-039 Data are regression estimates (95% CI). All outcomes were assessed on the 103 710 black American respondents in the 2013-15 US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Separate regressions were done for the two exposures (number of killings and any killings); additionally, each column represents a separate regression. 95% Cls are corrected for clustering at the state level. All models were adjusted for respondent sex, age group, and level of education; and state-survey month, survey year-survey month, and survey day of week fixed effects. OLS-ordinary least squares. *Defined as 14 days or more of poor mental in the past 30 days. †Exposures are measured in the 30 days before the interview date. #Wild cluster bootstrap-t p values account for potential underestimates of SEs when the number of clusters is small. These were estimated on least-squares (ie, linear probability model) versions of the models listed because they cannot be applied to non-linear estimators (eg, Poisson). Table 3: Exposure to police killings of unarmed black Americans and poor mental health days among black Americans: regression estimates
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.6: Summarizing Categorical Data
Problem 10CYU
Related questions
Question
How can we interpret the confidence interval for the secondary exposure in the regression model of the primary outcome in Table 3?
![Number of police killings of unarmed
black Americanst
p value
Wild cluster bootstrap-t p value
Any police killings of unarmed black
Americans (vs none) t
p value
Wild cluster bootstrap-t p value
Primary outcome
Poor mental health days
(OLS, rate difference)
0.14 (0.07-0.22)
0.00047
<0.0001
0.35 (0-03-0-67)
0.032
<0.0001
Poor mental health days
(Poisson, rate ratio)
1.033 (1.016-1.051)
0.00011
<0.0001
1.087 (1.006-1-174)
0.035
<0.0001
Secondary outcomes
Any poor mental health days
(Poisson, risk ratio)
1.022 (1-008-1.036)
0.0018
<0.0001
1.055 (1.007-1.106)
0.024
<0.0001
Frequent mental distress*
(Poisson, risk ratio)
1.036 (1.007-1.068)
0.016
<0.0001
1.106 (0.986-1-240)
0.085
0.039
Data are regression estimates (95% CI). All outcomes were assessed on the 103 710 black American respondents in the 2013-15 US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System. Separate regressions were done for the two exposures (number of killings and any killings); additionally, each column represents a separate regression. 95% Cls are
corrected for clustering at the state level. All models were adjusted for respondent sex, age group, and level of education; and state-survey month, survey year-survey
month, and survey day of week fixed effects. OLS-ordinary least squares. *Defined as 14 days or more of poor mental in the past 30 days. † Exposures are measured in the
30 days before the interview date. #Wild cluster bootstrap-t p values account for potential underestimates of SEs when the number of clusters is small. These were
estimated on least-squares (ie, linear probability model) versions of the models listed because they cannot be applied to non-linear estimators (eg, Poisson).
Table 3: Exposure to police killings of unarmed black Americans and poor mental health days among black Americans: regression estimates](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Ff42f7275-bf82-4914-9697-8a0dd89e5d81%2Fb6e54ab1-b7ce-4c25-b400-9efd5b819166%2F59gda0h_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Number of police killings of unarmed
black Americanst
p value
Wild cluster bootstrap-t p value
Any police killings of unarmed black
Americans (vs none) t
p value
Wild cluster bootstrap-t p value
Primary outcome
Poor mental health days
(OLS, rate difference)
0.14 (0.07-0.22)
0.00047
<0.0001
0.35 (0-03-0-67)
0.032
<0.0001
Poor mental health days
(Poisson, rate ratio)
1.033 (1.016-1.051)
0.00011
<0.0001
1.087 (1.006-1-174)
0.035
<0.0001
Secondary outcomes
Any poor mental health days
(Poisson, risk ratio)
1.022 (1-008-1.036)
0.0018
<0.0001
1.055 (1.007-1.106)
0.024
<0.0001
Frequent mental distress*
(Poisson, risk ratio)
1.036 (1.007-1.068)
0.016
<0.0001
1.106 (0.986-1-240)
0.085
0.039
Data are regression estimates (95% CI). All outcomes were assessed on the 103 710 black American respondents in the 2013-15 US Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System. Separate regressions were done for the two exposures (number of killings and any killings); additionally, each column represents a separate regression. 95% Cls are
corrected for clustering at the state level. All models were adjusted for respondent sex, age group, and level of education; and state-survey month, survey year-survey
month, and survey day of week fixed effects. OLS-ordinary least squares. *Defined as 14 days or more of poor mental in the past 30 days. † Exposures are measured in the
30 days before the interview date. #Wild cluster bootstrap-t p values account for potential underestimates of SEs when the number of clusters is small. These were
estimated on least-squares (ie, linear probability model) versions of the models listed because they cannot be applied to non-linear estimators (eg, Poisson).
Table 3: Exposure to police killings of unarmed black Americans and poor mental health days among black Americans: regression estimates
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
![College Algebra](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781938168383/9781938168383_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781680331141/9781680331141_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
![Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
![College Algebra](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781938168383/9781938168383_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781680331141/9781680331141_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…
Algebra
ISBN:
9781680331141
Author:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
![Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780547587776/9780547587776_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
![College Algebra (MindTap Course List)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305652231/9781305652231_smallCoverImage.gif)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning