Nuclear safety devices installed several years ago have been depreciated from a first cost of $200,000 to zero using the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS). The devices can be sold on the used equipment market for an estimated $15,000, or they can be retained in service for 5 more years with a $9000 upgrade now and an operating expenses (OE) of $6000 per year. The upgrade investment will be depreciated over 3 years with no salvage value. The challenger is a replacement with newer technology at a first cost of $40,000, n=5 years, and S=0. The new units will have operating expenses of $7000 per year. Use a 5-year study period, an effective tax rate of 41%, an after-tax minimum acceptable rate of return (MARR) of 10% per year, and an assumption of classical straight line depreciation (no half-year convention) to perform an after-tax AW-based replacement study. The annual worth of the defender is determined to be $ [-10000 The annual worth of the challenger is determined to be $ Since the annual worth of the defender is smaller, it is retained.

Nuclear safety devices installed several years ago have been depreciated from a first cost of $200,000 to zero using the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS). The devices can be sold on the used equipment market for an estimated $15,000, or they can be retained in service for 5 more years with a $9000 upgrade now and an operating expenses (OE) of $6000 per year. The upgrade investment will be depreciated over 3 years with no salvage value. The challenger is a replacement with newer technology at a first cost of $40,000, n=5 years, and S=0. The new units will have operating expenses of $7000 per year. Use a 5-year study period, an effective tax rate of 41%, an after-tax minimum acceptable rate of return (MARR) of 10% per year, and an assumption of classical straight line depreciation (no half-year convention) to perform an after-tax AW-based replacement study. The annual worth of the defender is determined to be $ [-10000 The annual worth of the challenger is determined to be $ Since the annual worth of the defender is smaller, it is retained.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Required information For equipment that has a first cost of $10,500, the estimated operating costs and year-end salvage values are as shown. Year Operating Cost, $ Salvage Value, $ 1 -1,000 7,000 2 -1,200 5,000 3 -1,300 4,500 4 -2,000 3,000 5 -3,000 2,000 Determine the economic service life ESL, at i= 10% per year using factors. The economic service life ESL, is 4 O years with the AW $- 5982.12 =
Stahmann Products paid $350,000 for a numerical controller and had it installed at a cost of $50,000. The recovery period was 7 years with an estimated salvage value of 10% of the original purchase price. Stahmann sold the system 4 years after it was purchased for $45,000. State the numerical values for the following: remaining life at sale time, market value at sale time, and book value at sale time if 65% of the basis had been depreciated. The remaining life at sale time is years. The market value at sale time is $ . The book value at sale time if 65% of the basis has been depreciated is $ .
A steam generation system at a biomass-fueled power plant uses an electrostaticprecipitator (ESP) to clean its gaseous effluents. The power plant has consistently made use ofthe same type of ESP over the past several years. The installed cost of a new ESP has beenrelatively constant at $100,000. Records of operation and maintenance expenses indicate thefollowing average expenses per year as a function of the age of the ESP. The MVs of the ESP arealso reasonably well known as a function of age. Data graph in image attached. Determine the best time to replace the ESP if the MARR is 15% per year.
Please correct Solution with Explanation and do not give image format
Because it fumes at room temperatures, hydrochloric acid creates a very corrosive work environment. A machine working in that environment is deteriorating quickly and can be used for only one more year, at which time it will be scrapped with no salvage value. It was purchased 3 years ago for $88,000, and its operating cost for the next year is expected to be $49,000. A more corrosion-resistant challenger will cost $206,000 with an operating cost of $46,000 per year. It is expected to have a $50,000 salvage value after its 10-year ESL. At an interest rate of 8% per year, what minimum replacement value would render the challenger attractive? The minimum replacement value that would render the challenger attractive is $ .
Required information For equipment that has a first cost of $17,000, the estimated operating costs and year-end salvage values are as shown. Year Operating Cost, $ Salvage Value, $ 1 -1,000 7,000 2 -1,200 5,000 3 -1,300 4,500 4 -2,000 3,000 5 -3,000 2,000 Write the PMT function to determine AW for year 4, if net operating costs are entered into cells B2 through B6. (Please upload your response/solution using the controls below.)
Ab3
A company owns an equipment that costs ₱ 90,000. After 8 years it will have an estimated salvage value of ₱ 18,000. Determine its book value at the end of 5 years using Declining Balance Method. Do not use excel!