ns of trade? ve up) is ] unit(s) of apparel for 1 ton of chemicals. wvill trade (give up) is [ ]ton(s) of chemicals for 1 unit of apparel. nge, or limits, of the terms of trade: ton(s) of chemicals (from China's position) ton(s) of chemicals (from the U.S. position) of trade are 1 unit of apparel for 1½ tons of chemicals, and that the amount exchanged is 4 units of What are the gains from specialization and trade for each nation? |unit(s) of apparel of ton(s) of chemicals ♥
ns of trade? ve up) is ] unit(s) of apparel for 1 ton of chemicals. wvill trade (give up) is [ ]ton(s) of chemicals for 1 unit of apparel. nge, or limits, of the terms of trade: ton(s) of chemicals (from China's position) ton(s) of chemicals (from the U.S. position) of trade are 1 unit of apparel for 1½ tons of chemicals, and that the amount exchanged is 4 units of What are the gains from specialization and trade for each nation? |unit(s) of apparel of ton(s) of chemicals ♥
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6490e/6490e393536dde13eb607fc71bb3fa356a97509d" alt="b. What is the total gain in apparel and chemical output that would result from such specialization?
Apparel:
unit(s)
Chemicals:
|unit(s)
c. What are the limits of the terms of trade?
The most China will trade (give up) is unit(s) of apparel for 1 ton of chemicals.
The most the United States will trade (give up) is O ton(s) of chemicals for 1 unit of apparel.
This implies the following range, or limits, of the terms of trade:
1 unit of apparel for
ton(s) of chemicals (from China's position)
1 unit of apparel for
ton(s) of chemicals (from the U.S. position)
Suppose that the actual terms of trade are 1 unit of apparel for 12 tons of chemicals, and that the amount exchanged is 4 units of
apparel for 6 tons of chemicals. What are the gains from specialization and trade for each nation?
China has a gain of
unit(s) of apparel v
The United States has a gain of
ton(s) of chemicals v"
Transcribed Image Text:b. What is the total gain in apparel and chemical output that would result from such specialization?
Apparel:
unit(s)
Chemicals:
|unit(s)
c. What are the limits of the terms of trade?
The most China will trade (give up) is unit(s) of apparel for 1 ton of chemicals.
The most the United States will trade (give up) is O ton(s) of chemicals for 1 unit of apparel.
This implies the following range, or limits, of the terms of trade:
1 unit of apparel for
ton(s) of chemicals (from China's position)
1 unit of apparel for
ton(s) of chemicals (from the U.S. position)
Suppose that the actual terms of trade are 1 unit of apparel for 12 tons of chemicals, and that the amount exchanged is 4 units of
apparel for 6 tons of chemicals. What are the gains from specialization and trade for each nation?
China has a gain of
unit(s) of apparel v
The United States has a gain of
ton(s) of chemicals v
![The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States. Assume that before specialization and
trade the optimal product mix for China is alternative B and for the United States is alternative U. [Note: 1 unit of apparel is 1,000 items
and 1 unit of chemicals is 1 ton.]
China Production Possibilities
Product
A
E
F
in thousands)
Apparel
Chemicals (in tons)
30
24
18
12
12
18
24
30
U.S. Production Possibilities
Product
R
S
T
U
V
W
Apparel (in thousands)
Chemicals (in tons)
10
8
6
4
2
4
8
12
16
20
Instructions: Enter your answers as whole numbers.
a. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two areas should specialize?
Yes
If so, what product should each produce?
China should produce apparel
The United States should produce chemicals](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fa6b045df-0c56-41dd-816d-1a14e1b5e0db%2F563dec60-f3c1-49cc-8adb-680245f0db91%2Fo9cwnn_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:The following hypothetical production possibilities tables are for China and the United States. Assume that before specialization and
trade the optimal product mix for China is alternative B and for the United States is alternative U. [Note: 1 unit of apparel is 1,000 items
and 1 unit of chemicals is 1 ton.]
China Production Possibilities
Product
A
E
F
in thousands)
Apparel
Chemicals (in tons)
30
24
18
12
12
18
24
30
U.S. Production Possibilities
Product
R
S
T
U
V
W
Apparel (in thousands)
Chemicals (in tons)
10
8
6
4
2
4
8
12
16
20
Instructions: Enter your answers as whole numbers.
a. Are comparative-cost conditions such that the two areas should specialize?
Yes
If so, what product should each produce?
China should produce apparel
The United States should produce chemicals
Expert Solution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00039/00039eaf710a9765f6db01fc5b9812260bf5cade" alt=""
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0cbe/e0cbe7c1cfa79a285a06530332b315bcf077d9a4" alt="Blurred answer"
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d40d3/d40d3c1ca4b9bea0c87391e8612ebe72173f4640" alt="ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69402/694020f91face6e45e748cde6f016c6fd19d1036" alt="Principles of Economics (12th Edition)"
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eb23/5eb235a9ab0509ef043c9cb4556fa7190f12569c" alt="Engineering Economy (17th Edition)"
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d40d3/d40d3c1ca4b9bea0c87391e8612ebe72173f4640" alt="ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69402/694020f91face6e45e748cde6f016c6fd19d1036" alt="Principles of Economics (12th Edition)"
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5eb23/5eb235a9ab0509ef043c9cb4556fa7190f12569c" alt="Engineering Economy (17th Edition)"
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdc54/cdc5496b537fbfc1057a184189887b6d58a60073" alt="Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)"
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24f1c/24f1cd9875f29b7cfaa318272ab005292620e05a" alt="Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach"
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cc1d/7cc1d7503821b48c438bfa2bc795941cf54d2af5" alt="Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…"
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education