■ Note that if s = 0 (no difference in fitness for the homozygous recessive genotype), then the denominator is 1, and p (and thus q) will not change. As s increases, the denominator becomes less than 1, and p increases with each generation. See box 7.5 in your text for the derivation, which I do not expect you to know. 4 ample: Consider a rabbit whose running speed is determined by a single locus, with two alleles, R₁ and R2. R₁ is dominant to R₂, such that rabbits that are mozygous recessive for R₂ run slower and thus get eaten by fox more often. As

Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
11th Edition
ISBN:9780134580999
Author:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Chapter1: The Human Body: An Orientation
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: The correct sequence of levels forming the structural hierarchy is A. (a) organ, organ system,...
icon
Related questions
Question
7:50 PM Tue Feb 13
<WS7_Quantifying_Hardy-Weinberg copy
5
it
Home
Calibri
Insert
O
■
■
Natural selection favoring a dominant allele
O When a population is experiencing directional selection in favor of a dominant
allele, we expect the frequency of that allele to increase. The question then is,
how fast to we expect the allele and genotype frequencies to change from one
generation to the next, given current allele frequencies and the strength of
selection?
■
Draw Layout Review
■
12
We can express the strength of selection as s, where s is the reduction in fitness
of the homozygous recessive genotype, compared to the heterozygous and
homozygous dominant genotypes:
■
I
Genotype Fitness
Α1Α1
1
A1A2
1
A₂A2
1-s
Here, A₁ is dominant to A2, which can be seen from the fact that fitness is
equal to 1 with either 1 or 1 copies of A₁.
With a little bit of math, we can show that the abundance of a dominant allele
that confers higher fitness will increase in abundance according to the following
formula:
■
View
References
U aAA✓ | E
p' = p/(1-q²s)
Here, p' is our expected p in the next generation, given p and s.
Note that if s = 0 (no difference in fitness for the homozygous recessive
genotype), then the denominator is 1, and p (and thus q) will not change.
As s increases, the denominator becomes less than 1, and p increases
with each generation.
See box 7.5 in your text for the derivation, which I do not expect you to
know.
4
o Example: Consider a rabbit whose running speed is determined by a single locus,
R, with two alleles, R₁ and R₂. R₁ is dominant to R₂, such that rabbits that are
homozygous recessive for R₂ run slower and thus get eaten by fox more often. As
such, R₂R2 rabbits produce 10% fewer offspring on average than either R₁R₁ or
R₁R2 rabbits. If the frequency of the R₁ allele is 0.6 in one generation, what do
you expect the frequency of the R₁ allele to be in the next generation?
Answer: p' = p/(1-q²s) = 0.6/(1-0.4²*0.1) = 0.610
36%
Question: Consider a cacti whose photosynthetic rate is determined by a single
locus, A, with two alleles, A₁ and A2. A₁ is dominant to A2, such that cacti that are
homozygous recessive for A₂ grow slower than cacti that have at least 1 copy of
A₁. As such, A₂A2 rabbits produce 20% fewer offspring on average than either
A₁A₁ or A₁A₂ cacti. If the frequency of the A₁ allele is 0.3 in one generation, what
do you expect the frequency of the A₁ allele to be in the next generation?
Transcribed Image Text:7:50 PM Tue Feb 13 <WS7_Quantifying_Hardy-Weinberg copy 5 it Home Calibri Insert O ■ ■ Natural selection favoring a dominant allele O When a population is experiencing directional selection in favor of a dominant allele, we expect the frequency of that allele to increase. The question then is, how fast to we expect the allele and genotype frequencies to change from one generation to the next, given current allele frequencies and the strength of selection? ■ Draw Layout Review ■ 12 We can express the strength of selection as s, where s is the reduction in fitness of the homozygous recessive genotype, compared to the heterozygous and homozygous dominant genotypes: ■ I Genotype Fitness Α1Α1 1 A1A2 1 A₂A2 1-s Here, A₁ is dominant to A2, which can be seen from the fact that fitness is equal to 1 with either 1 or 1 copies of A₁. With a little bit of math, we can show that the abundance of a dominant allele that confers higher fitness will increase in abundance according to the following formula: ■ View References U aAA✓ | E p' = p/(1-q²s) Here, p' is our expected p in the next generation, given p and s. Note that if s = 0 (no difference in fitness for the homozygous recessive genotype), then the denominator is 1, and p (and thus q) will not change. As s increases, the denominator becomes less than 1, and p increases with each generation. See box 7.5 in your text for the derivation, which I do not expect you to know. 4 o Example: Consider a rabbit whose running speed is determined by a single locus, R, with two alleles, R₁ and R₂. R₁ is dominant to R₂, such that rabbits that are homozygous recessive for R₂ run slower and thus get eaten by fox more often. As such, R₂R2 rabbits produce 10% fewer offspring on average than either R₁R₁ or R₁R2 rabbits. If the frequency of the R₁ allele is 0.6 in one generation, what do you expect the frequency of the R₁ allele to be in the next generation? Answer: p' = p/(1-q²s) = 0.6/(1-0.4²*0.1) = 0.610 36% Question: Consider a cacti whose photosynthetic rate is determined by a single locus, A, with two alleles, A₁ and A2. A₁ is dominant to A2, such that cacti that are homozygous recessive for A₂ grow slower than cacti that have at least 1 copy of A₁. As such, A₂A2 rabbits produce 20% fewer offspring on average than either A₁A₁ or A₁A₂ cacti. If the frequency of the A₁ allele is 0.3 in one generation, what do you expect the frequency of the A₁ allele to be in the next generation?
7:50 PM Tue Feb 13
<WS7_Quantifying_Hardy-Weinberg copy
5
it
Home
Calibri
Insert
■
Draw Layout Review
fexp[A1A2]
fexp[A2A2]
●
Non-random mating
o Species can exhibit non-random mating in one of two ways: assortative mating
and disassortative mating. With disassortative mating, individuals tend to mate
with individuals that are more different. With assortative mating, individuals
tend to mate with individuals that are more similar. Here, we will focus on
assortative mating, which leads to inbreeding.
=
o Wright's F statistic represents the proportion of the population that is
inbreeding. Populations that are small (non-infinite) An extreme example of
inbreeding is when individuals can self-fertilize (aka ‘are selfing'). F is also the
likelihood that two alleles are identical by descent. This is because when a
population is inbreeding, eventually every locus in every individual is
homozygous with both copies identical by descent from a common ancestor. If
only a part of a population is inbreeding, then the part of the population that is
inbreeding will eventually become homozygous with both copies identical by
descent from a common ancestor.
=
O
In a nutshell, with inbreeding, the expected frequency of heterozygotes is
reduced by F and those frequencies get shifted to the homozygotes. See Box 7.9
in your text.
fexp[A1A1]
=
=
=
=
12
=
=
=
B
p²(1-F) + pF
p² -ppF+pF
p² + Fp(q)
p² +Fpq
2pg (1-F)
q²(1-F) +qF
q²-gqF+qF
q² +Fq(p)
q² + Fog
=
I
=
=
2pq - F2pq
=
View
U aA | 9 ✓ A✓ | E-
p²1- p²F + pF
p² +Fp(1-p)
References
q²1- q²F+qF
q² + Fq (1-q)
LO
5
o Example: What are expected genotype frequencies for A₁ and A2 when f[A₁] = 0.7
and f[A₂] = 0.3, and 40% of the population is inbreeding (mating with close relatives).
Answer:
● fexp[A1A1] = p² +Fpq = 0.7*0.7 + 0.4*0.7*0.3 = 0.574
● fexp[A1A2] = 2pg (1-F) = 2*0.7*0.3 -2*0.7*0.3*0.4 = 0.252
● fexp[A2A2] =q² +Fpq = 0.3*0.3 + 0.4*0.7*0.3 = 0.174
Note that expected genotype frequencies should sum to 1.00. if not,
you have an error.
36%
Question: What are expected genotype frequencies for A₁ and A2 when f[A₁] = 0.6
and f[A₂] = 0.4, and 70% of the population is inbreeding (mating with close relatives).
||
Transcribed Image Text:7:50 PM Tue Feb 13 <WS7_Quantifying_Hardy-Weinberg copy 5 it Home Calibri Insert ■ Draw Layout Review fexp[A1A2] fexp[A2A2] ● Non-random mating o Species can exhibit non-random mating in one of two ways: assortative mating and disassortative mating. With disassortative mating, individuals tend to mate with individuals that are more different. With assortative mating, individuals tend to mate with individuals that are more similar. Here, we will focus on assortative mating, which leads to inbreeding. = o Wright's F statistic represents the proportion of the population that is inbreeding. Populations that are small (non-infinite) An extreme example of inbreeding is when individuals can self-fertilize (aka ‘are selfing'). F is also the likelihood that two alleles are identical by descent. This is because when a population is inbreeding, eventually every locus in every individual is homozygous with both copies identical by descent from a common ancestor. If only a part of a population is inbreeding, then the part of the population that is inbreeding will eventually become homozygous with both copies identical by descent from a common ancestor. = O In a nutshell, with inbreeding, the expected frequency of heterozygotes is reduced by F and those frequencies get shifted to the homozygotes. See Box 7.9 in your text. fexp[A1A1] = = = = 12 = = = B p²(1-F) + pF p² -ppF+pF p² + Fp(q) p² +Fpq 2pg (1-F) q²(1-F) +qF q²-gqF+qF q² +Fq(p) q² + Fog = I = = 2pq - F2pq = View U aA | 9 ✓ A✓ | E- p²1- p²F + pF p² +Fp(1-p) References q²1- q²F+qF q² + Fq (1-q) LO 5 o Example: What are expected genotype frequencies for A₁ and A2 when f[A₁] = 0.7 and f[A₂] = 0.3, and 40% of the population is inbreeding (mating with close relatives). Answer: ● fexp[A1A1] = p² +Fpq = 0.7*0.7 + 0.4*0.7*0.3 = 0.574 ● fexp[A1A2] = 2pg (1-F) = 2*0.7*0.3 -2*0.7*0.3*0.4 = 0.252 ● fexp[A2A2] =q² +Fpq = 0.3*0.3 + 0.4*0.7*0.3 = 0.174 Note that expected genotype frequencies should sum to 1.00. if not, you have an error. 36% Question: What are expected genotype frequencies for A₁ and A2 when f[A₁] = 0.6 and f[A₂] = 0.4, and 70% of the population is inbreeding (mating with close relatives). ||
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Genetic variation
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, biology and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Human Anatomy & Physiology (11th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780134580999
Author:
Elaine N. Marieb, Katja N. Hoehn
Publisher:
PEARSON
Biology 2e
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:
9781947172517
Author:
Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:
OpenStax
Anatomy & Physiology
Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781259398629
Author:
McKinley, Michael P., O'loughlin, Valerie Dean, Bidle, Theresa Stouter
Publisher:
Mcgraw Hill Education,
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Molecular Biology of the Cell (Sixth Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9780815344322
Author:
Bruce Alberts, Alexander D. Johnson, Julian Lewis, David Morgan, Martin Raff, Keith Roberts, Peter Walter
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Laboratory Manual For Human Anatomy & Physiology
Biology
ISBN:
9781260159363
Author:
Martin, Terry R., Prentice-craver, Cynthia
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Inquiry Into Life (16th Edition)
Biology
ISBN:
9781260231700
Author:
Sylvia S. Mader, Michael Windelspecht
Publisher:
McGraw Hill Education