No need generalized answer ok answer full correct ok. Wk 5 Discussion Forum: Trends in Leadership There are currently four perspectives on ambidexterity (structural, contextual, temporal, and as a form of leadership). The article on the ambidextrous organization confronts the oldest issue of this problem: How to exploit core competencies and also explore for innovation as a form of structure. A traditional way of looking at this problem is to allocate exploitation to operations and exploration to R&D. Recent developments though point out that the "structural ambidexterity" needs to be built throughout a company via company culture. For example, you might have a start-up or smaller firm that may need to embed both more quickly. (See Birkenshaw & Gibson) In today's economy, though, many companies may need to shift between exploitation and exploration at different points in life cycles and as a dynamic capability. For example, a company in a start-up phase may emphasize an exploratory focus but then may need to turn and reach a point of exploitation focus during its maturity phase. Yet to renew its capacity and potentially to maintain both as vital functions for quality/efficiency with an innovation, a company and its HR practice must translate ambidexterity into its leadership function (see the "Ambidextrous CEO") and leadership succession planning practices. Given this perspective, and for this week's forum discussion, as a leader, how might you deal with these levels of ambidexterity? Think of Amazon. Think of Leslie Brinkman. Think of your own organization. What implications might they have on the culture of the organization? Why is it ambidexterity neccesary given current rates of disruption and digital transformation? . For example, a company in a start-up phase may emphasize an exploratory focus but then may need to turn and reach a point of exploitation focus during its maturity phase. Yet to renew its capacity and potentially to maintain both as vital functions for quality/efficiency with an innovation, a company and its HR practice must translate ambidexterity into its leadership function (see the "Ambidextrous CEO" and "Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability") and leadership succession planning practices. Given this perspective, and for this week's forum discussion, as a leader, how might you deal with these levels of ambidexterity? Think of Amazon. Think of Leslie Brinkman. Think of your own organization. What implications might they have on the culture of the organization? Why is it ambidexterity necessary given current rates of disruption and digital transformation?
No need generalized answer ok answer full correct ok. Wk 5 Discussion Forum: Trends in Leadership There are currently four perspectives on ambidexterity (structural, contextual, temporal, and as a form of leadership). The article on the ambidextrous organization confronts the oldest issue of this problem: How to exploit core competencies and also explore for innovation as a form of structure. A traditional way of looking at this problem is to allocate exploitation to operations and exploration to R&D. Recent developments though point out that the "structural ambidexterity" needs to be built throughout a company via company culture. For example, you might have a start-up or smaller firm that may need to embed both more quickly. (See Birkenshaw & Gibson) In today's economy, though, many companies may need to shift between exploitation and exploration at different points in life cycles and as a dynamic capability. For example, a company in a start-up phase may emphasize an exploratory focus but then may need to turn and reach a point of exploitation focus during its maturity phase. Yet to renew its capacity and potentially to maintain both as vital functions for quality/efficiency with an innovation, a company and its HR practice must translate ambidexterity into its leadership function (see the "Ambidextrous CEO") and leadership succession planning practices. Given this perspective, and for this week's forum discussion, as a leader, how might you deal with these levels of ambidexterity? Think of Amazon. Think of Leslie Brinkman. Think of your own organization. What implications might they have on the culture of the organization? Why is it ambidexterity neccesary given current rates of disruption and digital transformation? . For example, a company in a start-up phase may emphasize an exploratory focus but then may need to turn and reach a point of exploitation focus during its maturity phase. Yet to renew its capacity and potentially to maintain both as vital functions for quality/efficiency with an innovation, a company and its HR practice must translate ambidexterity into its leadership function (see the "Ambidextrous CEO" and "Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability") and leadership succession planning practices. Given this perspective, and for this week's forum discussion, as a leader, how might you deal with these levels of ambidexterity? Think of Amazon. Think of Leslie Brinkman. Think of your own organization. What implications might they have on the culture of the organization? Why is it ambidexterity necessary given current rates of disruption and digital transformation?
Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1CE
Related questions
Question
No need generalized answer ok answer full correct ok.
Wk 5 Discussion Forum: Trends in Leadership
There are currently four perspectives on ambidexterity (structural, contextual, temporal, and as a form of leadership). The article on the ambidextrous organization confronts the oldest issue of this problem: How to exploit core competencies and also explore for innovation as a form of structure. A traditional way of looking at this problem is to allocate exploitation to operations and exploration to R&D.
Recent developments though point out that the "structural ambidexterity" needs to be built throughout a company via company culture. For example, you might have a start-up or smaller firm that may need to embed both more quickly. (See Birkenshaw & Gibson)
In today's economy, though, many companies may need to shift between exploitation and exploration at different points in life cycles and as a dynamic capability. For example, a company in a start-up phase may emphasize an exploratory focus but then may need to turn and reach a point of exploitation focus during its maturity phase. Yet to renew its capacity and potentially to maintain both as vital functions for quality/efficiency with an innovation, a company and its HR practice must translate ambidexterity into its leadership function (see the "Ambidextrous CEO") and leadership succession planning practices.
Given this perspective, and for this week's forum discussion, as a leader, how might you deal with these levels of ambidexterity? Think of Amazon. Think of Leslie Brinkman. Think of your own organization. What implications might they have on the culture of the organization?
Why is it ambidexterity neccesary given current rates of disruption and digital transformation?
. For example, a company in a start-up phase may emphasize an exploratory focus but then may need to turn and reach a point of exploitation focus during its maturity phase. Yet to renew its capacity and potentially to maintain both as vital functions for quality/efficiency with an innovation, a company and its HR practice must translate ambidexterity into its leadership function (see the "Ambidextrous CEO" and "Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability") and leadership succession planning practices.
Given this perspective, and for this week's forum discussion, as a leader, how might you deal with these levels of ambidexterity? Think of Amazon. Think of Leslie Brinkman. Think of your own organization. What implications might they have on the culture of the organization?
Why is it ambidexterity necessary given current rates of disruption and digital transformation?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Step 1: Introduction:
VIEWStep 2: Dealing with the levels of ambidexterity can be a complex task, some strategies to consider:
VIEWStep 3: The pursuit of ambidexterity has significant implications on the culture of an organization:
VIEWStep 4: Ambidexterity is necessary given the current rates of disruption and digital transformation:
VIEWSolution
VIEW
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 5 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:
9781259929434
Author:
William Nickels
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134527604
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:
PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…
Management
ISBN:
9781305947412
Author:
Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Understanding Business
Management
ISBN:
9781259929434
Author:
William Nickels
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Management (14th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134527604
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter
Publisher:
PEARSON
Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…
Management
ISBN:
9781305947412
Author:
Cliff Ragsdale
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…
Management
ISBN:
9780135191798
Author:
Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon
Publisher:
PEARSON
Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…
Management
ISBN:
9780134728391
Author:
Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin
Publisher:
PEARSON
Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)
Management
ISBN:
9780134237473
Author:
Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo
Publisher:
PEARSON