need an fully explanation for this below view point and reason why he have this point. Also do he agree or disagree to the Auckland urban sprawl.

icon
Related questions
Question
I need an fully explanation for this below view point and reason why he have this point. Also do he agree or disagree to the Auckland urban sprawl.
viduals or organisations that
Group/Organisation
Papakura resident
Auckland urban planner
Dairy farmer on Auckland's periphery
Ponsonby resident
Individual
Wirimu Takerei
Daniel Kereru
Bob Jones
Kat Stevens
For THREE of the individuals listed above fully explain the different viewpoini
they have about Auckland's urban growth.incorporating their beliefs, values anaro
perspectives.
You will need to state what their viewpoints about Auckland's urban growth are aNo
provide T WO detailed reasons each for why they hold that view.
Include how a Geographic Concept relates to this person's viewpoint.
Also include specific detail from the resource and geographic terminalogy-
Include in your reasons how the person's beliefs, values or perceptions Kave
affected their viewpoint.
Individual 1:
Group/Organisation they belong to:
Describe their viewpoint on urban sprawl: For urban sprawl
Against urban sprawl
This person
thinks...
Reasons for this viewpoint
Transcribed Image Text:viduals or organisations that Group/Organisation Papakura resident Auckland urban planner Dairy farmer on Auckland's periphery Ponsonby resident Individual Wirimu Takerei Daniel Kereru Bob Jones Kat Stevens For THREE of the individuals listed above fully explain the different viewpoini they have about Auckland's urban growth.incorporating their beliefs, values anaro perspectives. You will need to state what their viewpoints about Auckland's urban growth are aNo provide T WO detailed reasons each for why they hold that view. Include how a Geographic Concept relates to this person's viewpoint. Also include specific detail from the resource and geographic terminalogy- Include in your reasons how the person's beliefs, values or perceptions Kave affected their viewpoint. Individual 1: Group/Organisation they belong to: Describe their viewpoint on urban sprawl: For urban sprawl Against urban sprawl This person thinks... Reasons for this viewpoint
Urban planner
I have worked for the Auckland City Council as an urban planner for 15 years. I am proud to
have had some input into shaping the development of our fine city. Auckland has always
been a sprawled out city because of our low population and there being enough room for the
council and us planners to allow stand-alone low density housing. However, our populatin
erowing quickly now and we are starting to run out of room. We will need to release more
land on the outskirts of the city in the greenbelt, which we are doing in the Pakuranga,
Manurewa and Te Atatu areas so we can meet the demand for houses with large sections, I'm
happy to say brand new sections of the NW and Southern motorways have just been finished
which means that when we build housing in these new subdivisions the residents can have
easy accessibility to the rest of the city. Auckland is not a city who relies on public transport
and our decision not to develop rail or an underground railway was a good one I believe.
Instead we have ensured through the motorway network that individuals can travel where
they want when they want to and they are not restricted by timetables or by the need to live
near a bus or train station.
We talked to Daniel Kereru, an urban planner with the Auckland City Council. He said there were many
problems with urban sprawl.
"Fertile farmland, such as in the Bombay Hills, south of Auckland
would no longer be available for growing food, roads would be
Increasingly congested as more people have to travel longer distances,
and of course this adds to gir pollution as CO2 is pumped into the air
while people sit in traffic. The cost of providing infrastructure, such as
water and sewage pipes and power lines to such a wide area would
push rates up and there would be a lack of access to the services of the
CBD from peripheral suburbs." 9
/According to Daniel Kereru, "Auckland's population growth is not going to slow down in a hurry". Currently
there are 1.5 million residents and it is predicted to reach 2 million by 2031. Of course it is physically
possible for the city to continue to grow outwards as there is land available North and South of the city
limits. If the council allows land on the periphery to be developed then there will be a good supply of
housing and the price of houses will remain affordable. Many Auckland residents desire their own house
and backyard. Wirimu Takerei and his family own their house in Papakura.
ckland an
Another option according to Daniel
Kereru is to develop a satellite city in Orewa, North of Auckland.
This option would allow for further low density housing, which
many Auckland residents desire, to be developed but mainly in
Orewa, not Auckland. Residents in Orewa will have good
accessibility to Auckland and all it offers by way of a motorway
connection. It is only a 40 minute drive to the CBD which is
considered an easy commute. Employment, entertainment and
other services will be developed in Orewa as well, so some
and
residents won't have to commute to Auckland at all. Urban
sprawl in Auckland itself would slow as most population growth
would be catered for in the satellite city.
Whatever the best option is, it will have to deal with rapid population growth, keep Auckland moving, care
for the environment and keep residents relatively happy with the housing options available.
Transcribed Image Text:Urban planner I have worked for the Auckland City Council as an urban planner for 15 years. I am proud to have had some input into shaping the development of our fine city. Auckland has always been a sprawled out city because of our low population and there being enough room for the council and us planners to allow stand-alone low density housing. However, our populatin erowing quickly now and we are starting to run out of room. We will need to release more land on the outskirts of the city in the greenbelt, which we are doing in the Pakuranga, Manurewa and Te Atatu areas so we can meet the demand for houses with large sections, I'm happy to say brand new sections of the NW and Southern motorways have just been finished which means that when we build housing in these new subdivisions the residents can have easy accessibility to the rest of the city. Auckland is not a city who relies on public transport and our decision not to develop rail or an underground railway was a good one I believe. Instead we have ensured through the motorway network that individuals can travel where they want when they want to and they are not restricted by timetables or by the need to live near a bus or train station. We talked to Daniel Kereru, an urban planner with the Auckland City Council. He said there were many problems with urban sprawl. "Fertile farmland, such as in the Bombay Hills, south of Auckland would no longer be available for growing food, roads would be Increasingly congested as more people have to travel longer distances, and of course this adds to gir pollution as CO2 is pumped into the air while people sit in traffic. The cost of providing infrastructure, such as water and sewage pipes and power lines to such a wide area would push rates up and there would be a lack of access to the services of the CBD from peripheral suburbs." 9 /According to Daniel Kereru, "Auckland's population growth is not going to slow down in a hurry". Currently there are 1.5 million residents and it is predicted to reach 2 million by 2031. Of course it is physically possible for the city to continue to grow outwards as there is land available North and South of the city limits. If the council allows land on the periphery to be developed then there will be a good supply of housing and the price of houses will remain affordable. Many Auckland residents desire their own house and backyard. Wirimu Takerei and his family own their house in Papakura. ckland an Another option according to Daniel Kereru is to develop a satellite city in Orewa, North of Auckland. This option would allow for further low density housing, which many Auckland residents desire, to be developed but mainly in Orewa, not Auckland. Residents in Orewa will have good accessibility to Auckland and all it offers by way of a motorway connection. It is only a 40 minute drive to the CBD which is considered an easy commute. Employment, entertainment and other services will be developed in Orewa as well, so some and residents won't have to commute to Auckland at all. Urban sprawl in Auckland itself would slow as most population growth would be catered for in the satellite city. Whatever the best option is, it will have to deal with rapid population growth, keep Auckland moving, care for the environment and keep residents relatively happy with the housing options available.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer