N: $30 High price V: $130 New firm Low price N: $50 V: $100 Advertise Verizon N: $60 V: $140 Do not advertise Expand High price New firm New N: $70 V: $90 firm Low price Do not еxpand N: $30 V: $170 The figure shown displays the choices that could be made by Verizon and a new firm in the industry. The payoffs are the profits (in millions) these companies will earn as a result of their choices. What will be the outcome of this game? Multiple Choice The new firm will expand; Verizon will advertise; the new firm will choose high prices. The new firm will expand; Verizon will advertise; the new firm will choose low prices. The new firm will expand; Verizon will not advertise; the new firm will choose high prices. The new firm will not expand.

N: $30 High price V: $130 New firm Low price N: $50 V: $100 Advertise Verizon N: $60 V: $140 Do not advertise Expand High price New firm New N: $70 V: $90 firm Low price Do not еxpand N: $30 V: $170 The figure shown displays the choices that could be made by Verizon and a new firm in the industry. The payoffs are the profits (in millions) these companies will earn as a result of their choices. What will be the outcome of this game? Multiple Choice The new firm will expand; Verizon will advertise; the new firm will choose high prices. The new firm will expand; Verizon will advertise; the new firm will choose low prices. The new firm will expand; Verizon will not advertise; the new firm will choose high prices. The new firm will not expand.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Up Down Up Down Player 1 In the game above, what is/are the sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? (up,up) (up,down) (down, up) (down, down) No equilibrium exists Up Down Player 2 eLearning Help P1 gets $45 P2 gets $155 P1 gets $100 P2 gets $10 P1 gets $85 P2 gets $85 P1 gets $95 P2 gets $95
Megan and Martha own competing hair salons that are in the same neighborhood. They are both considering offering their clients discounts in order to increase business. The payoff matrix shows their yearly incomes in thousands of dollars if they offer and do not offer discounts to their customers. Martha Megan Discount No Discount Discount $50, $75 $75, $60 No Discount $35, $90 $70, $85 If both Megan and Martha did not discount, what would each earn in yearly income? Megan would earn $50,000; Martha would earn $75,000. Megan would earn $75,000; Martha would earn $60,000. Megan would earn $35,000; Martha would earn $90,000. Megan would earn $70,000; Martha would earn $85,000. Megan would earn $35,000; Martha would earn $85,000.
Two rival companies competing in the same market need to decide their plans for future expansion of their stores. The Table below shows the possible outcomes of their mutually interdependent actions (payoffs are profits in £m) Giga Company Titanic Conglomerate No Change Refurbishment of existing stores Large Expansion No Change 30, 40 25, 35 15, 24 Refurbishment of existing stores 35, 30 28, 32 18, 33 Large Expansion 12, 22 18, 20 20, 25 The Nash equilibrium: (A) does not exist. (B) occurs when both firms choose Refurbishment of existing stores. (C) occurs when both firms choose Large Expansion. (D) occurs when both firms choose No Change.
Two discount stores (Megastore and Superstore) are interested in expanding their market share through advertising. The table below depicts the strategic outcomes (profits) of both stores with and without advertising. Superstore - Advertise Superstore - Don't Advertise Megastore - Advertise $95, $80 $305, $55 Megastore - Don't Advertise $65, $285 $165, $115 When the game does reach Nash Equilibrium, the payoffs for both stores will be a) Megastore $95 and Superstore $80 b) Megastore $305 and Superstore $55 c) Megastore $65 and Superstore $285 d) Megastore $165 and Superstore $115
Suppose that Lionel Messi is negotiating a contract with FC Barcelona. Messi has an offer from Real Madrid for $20 million a year. If he signs with FC Barcelona, they will earn $90 million in revenue from the signing. FC Barcelona's next best option is to sign Cristiano Ronaldo. They would earn $70 million from signing Ronaldo and would pay him a contract of $10 million. Messi's bargaining power is w = 1/2. a) What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargaining? What is Messi's surplus and what is FC Barcelona's surplus? b) Due to an injury, FC Barcelona would only earn $50 million from signing Ronaldo but everything else remains the same. What is the negotiated salary between Messi and FC Barcelona under Nash Bargaining? What is Messi's surplus and what is FC Barcelona's surplus?
Match the definition to each term listed below. Number 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Definition A table that shows the payoffs each firm earns from every combination of firm strategies An agreement among firms to charge the same price or otherwise not to compete An option that is better than any alternative option regardless of what the other firm does An outcome of a strategic game from which neither rival wants to deviate A game outcome in which players seek to increase their mutual payoff A practice where one firm initiates a price change and the other firms follow the leader A game in which the firms choose their strategies at the same time One firm's gain must equal the other firm's loss A game in which the sum of Firms select their optimal strategies in a single time period without regard to possible interactions in subsequent time periods A game that occurs more than once the two firms' outcomes is positive Instructions: Enter a numeric response corresponding to the number of the…
Refer to the following payoff table: Firm A's Advertising Budget Low Multiple Choice Medium High A D G $900, $900 Low $1,000, $800 Firm A High; Firm B Low Firm A Low; Firm B Low Firm B's Advertising Budget Medium B E H $820, $1,220 $950, $1,025 с F 1 High $875, $920 $800, $875 $1,025, $1,175 Using the method of successive elimination of dominated strategies, which strategies, if any, are eliminated after the first round? $1,060, $1,100 $1,040, $1,000
Game Theory
Game theory - please help. Thanks!
Table: Two Rival Gas Stations Speedy Gas High Price. Low Price $100, $100 $150, $25 High Price $25, $150 Swifty Gas Low Price $50, $50 Look at the table Two Rival Gas Stations, which shows a payoff matrix for two gas stations in a small town. Each firm can set either a high price or a low price, and customers view these two firms as nearly perfect substitutes. Profits in each cell of the payoff matrix are given as (Swifty, Speedy). If both firm know that they will play the same game repeatedly for many time, both of them will choose tit-for-tat strategy. After they play the game for 10 times, what will be the Speedy Gas's total payoff for the 10 times: O $100 O $500 O $1500 O $150 O None of these options is correct.
Fred and Naomi are trying to decide how to spend Sunday. Their payoffs in terms of satisfaction are below. Fred's strategy Football Naomi strategy Football Movie There is no dominant strategy Dominant strategy is football Dominant strategy is movie There is no Nash equilibrium 5,3 1,1 Movie 0,0 3,5
here are two firms in the market, Pepsi and Coke. Strategies: Low price (price promotion, LP), Medium price (regular price, RP), high price (new price strategy, HP). Payoffs: Coke, Pepsi’s Net Profits; LP, LP: $1.4m, $1.2m; LP, RP: $3.1m, $0.6m; LP, HP: $3.9m, -$1.3m. RP, LP: $1.3m, $1.8m; RP, RP: $2.0m, $1.8m; RP, HP: $4.3m, $-0.3m. HP, LP: -$1.2m, $3.6m; HP, RP: $0.8m, $3.9m; HP, HP: $2.8m, $2.5m. In this game, the NE is (are): (HP, HP) (LP, LP) and (HP, HP) (LP, LP) There is no NE in this game (RP, RP)