Munson Manufacturing, in Gainesville, Florida, wants to arrange its four work centers so as to minimize interdepartmental parts handling costs. The flows and existing facility layout are shown in the figures below. Figure 1. Parts Moved Between Work Centers B 450 D 550 200 50 B 325 700 - D - Figure 2. Existing Layout A В D a) For the existing layout, the cumulative "load x distance" or "movement cost" = feet (enter your response as a whole number). Based on the flows shown in the matrix, one should expect that the centers A and V will be next to each other as they have the highest number of moves between each other. Based on the flows shown in the matrix, one should expect that centers C and V will be next to each other as they have the second highest number of moves between each other. b) The aim is to improve the layout so that the total "movement cost" can be reduced. Functional locations for A and D have been fixed. In the improved layout, the work center that should be located between them is: A D 30 30' 30' The cumulative distance based on the overall movement of parts between work centers for this layout = feet (enter your response as a whole number).

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
icon
Related questions
Question

Can you assit me with this problem 3 by showing me the process step by step. I prefer it not be in the form of an excel sheet because it is hard to follow along. Thank you kindl

Munson Manufacturing, in Gainesville, Florida, wants to arrange its four work centers to minimize interdepartmental parts handling costs. The flows and existing facility layout are shown below:

**Figure 1. Parts Moved Between Work Centers**

|   | A   | B   | C   | D   |
|---|-----|-----|-----|-----|
| A | -   | 450 | 550 | 50  |
| B | 325 | -   | 200 | 0   |
| C | 0   | 0   | -   | 700 |
| D | 0   | 0   | 0   | -   |

**Figure 2. Existing Layout**

\[ \text{A} \quad \text{B} \quad \text{C} \quad \text{D} \]

\[ \text{— 30’— | — 30’— | — 30’— | — 30’— |} \]

a) For the existing layout, the cumulative "load × distance" or "movement cost" = \_\_\_ feet (enter your response as a whole number).

Based on the flows shown in the matrix, one should expect that the centers A and \(\blacksquare\) will be next to each other as they have the highest number of moves between each other.

Based on the flows shown in the matrix, one should expect that centers C and \(\blacksquare\) will be next to each other as they have the second highest number of moves between each other.

b) The aim is to improve the layout so that the total "movement cost" can be reduced. Functional locations for A and D have been fixed. In the improved layout, the work center that should be located between them is:

\[ \text{A} \quad \blacksquare \quad \text{D} \]

\[ \text{—30’— | —30’— |} \]

The cumulative distance based on the overall movement of parts between work centers for this layout = \_\_\_ feet (enter your response as a whole number).
Transcribed Image Text:Munson Manufacturing, in Gainesville, Florida, wants to arrange its four work centers to minimize interdepartmental parts handling costs. The flows and existing facility layout are shown below: **Figure 1. Parts Moved Between Work Centers** | | A | B | C | D | |---|-----|-----|-----|-----| | A | - | 450 | 550 | 50 | | B | 325 | - | 200 | 0 | | C | 0 | 0 | - | 700 | | D | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | **Figure 2. Existing Layout** \[ \text{A} \quad \text{B} \quad \text{C} \quad \text{D} \] \[ \text{— 30’— | — 30’— | — 30’— | — 30’— |} \] a) For the existing layout, the cumulative "load × distance" or "movement cost" = \_\_\_ feet (enter your response as a whole number). Based on the flows shown in the matrix, one should expect that the centers A and \(\blacksquare\) will be next to each other as they have the highest number of moves between each other. Based on the flows shown in the matrix, one should expect that centers C and \(\blacksquare\) will be next to each other as they have the second highest number of moves between each other. b) The aim is to improve the layout so that the total "movement cost" can be reduced. Functional locations for A and D have been fixed. In the improved layout, the work center that should be located between them is: \[ \text{A} \quad \blacksquare \quad \text{D} \] \[ \text{—30’— | —30’— |} \] The cumulative distance based on the overall movement of parts between work centers for this layout = \_\_\_ feet (enter your response as a whole number).
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Operations Management
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Business in Action
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:
9780135198100
Author:
BOVEE
Publisher:
PEARSON CO
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.