Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
History
Jsing SOURCE 1, determine which question was at the heart of the Gideon v. Wainwright case? O Are states obligated to provide legal counsel when a defendant cannot afford one? O If proper arrest procedures are not followed must a judge dismiss a criminal case? O Must a warrant to search a property list exactly what police expect to find there? O Do people accused of crimes have a right to remain silent under questioning?

Jsing SOURCE 1, determine which question was at the heart of the Gideon v. Wainwright case? O Are states obligated to provide legal counsel when a defendant cannot afford one? O If proper arrest procedures are not followed must a judge dismiss a criminal case? O Must a warrant to search a property list exactly what police expect to find there? O Do people accused of crimes have a right to remain silent under questioning?

icon
Related questions
Question
Look at the U.S. History question below. Keep in mind that option A. Are states obligated to provide legal counsel when a defendant cannot afford one is incorrect. Choose the correct answer.
SOURCE 1 Excerpt from Oyez.com concerning the 1963 Supreme Court case, Gideon v. Wainwright. Facts of the case Clarence Earl Gideon was charged in Florida state court with felony breaking and entering. When he appeared in court without a lawyer, Gideon requested that the court appoint one for him. According to Florida state law, however, an attorney may only be appointed to an indigent defendant in capital cases, so the trial court did not appoint one. Gideon represented himself in trial. He was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison. Gideon filed a habeas corpus petition in the Florida Supreme Court, arguing that the trial court's decision violated his constitutional right to be represented by counsel. The Florida Supreme Court denied habeas corpus relief.
Transcribed Image Text:SOURCE 1 Excerpt from Oyez.com concerning the 1963 Supreme Court case, Gideon v. Wainwright. Facts of the case Clarence Earl Gideon was charged in Florida state court with felony breaking and entering. When he appeared in court without a lawyer, Gideon requested that the court appoint one for him. According to Florida state law, however, an attorney may only be appointed to an indigent defendant in capital cases, so the trial court did not appoint one. Gideon represented himself in trial. He was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison. Gideon filed a habeas corpus petition in the Florida Supreme Court, arguing that the trial court's decision violated his constitutional right to be represented by counsel. The Florida Supreme Court denied habeas corpus relief.
Using SOURCE 1, determine which question was at the heart of the Gideon v. Wainwright case? O Are states obligated to provide legal counsel when a defendant cannot afford one? O If proper arrest procedures are not followed must a judge dismiss a criminal case? O Must a warrant to search a property list exactly what police expect to find there? O Do people accused of crimes have a right to remain silent under questioning?
Transcribed Image Text:Using SOURCE 1, determine which question was at the heart of the Gideon v. Wainwright case? O Are states obligated to provide legal counsel when a defendant cannot afford one? O If proper arrest procedures are not followed must a judge dismiss a criminal case? O Must a warrant to search a property list exactly what police expect to find there? O Do people accused of crimes have a right to remain silent under questioning?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer