Joe owes Barry 100,000. Joe enters into an agreement with Citibank to borrow 100,000. Joe intends to use the loan proceeds to repay Barry. Citibank has does not know that Joe planned to pay Barry with the proceeds. Citibank agrees to make the loan but Citibank breaches its contract with Joe and does not lend him the money. Joe defaults on his loan to Barry, so Barry sues Citibank because they breached their contract with Joe. Barry argues that he is a third party beneficiary of Joe’s and Citibank’s contract. What is the outcome of Joe’s suit?
Joe owes Barry 100,000. Joe enters into an agreement with Citibank to borrow 100,000. Joe intends to use the loan proceeds to repay Barry. Citibank has does not know that Joe planned to pay Barry with the proceeds. Citibank agrees to make the loan but Citibank breaches its contract with Joe and does not lend him the money. Joe defaults on his loan to Barry, so Barry sues Citibank because they breached their contract with Joe. Barry argues that he is a third party beneficiary of Joe’s and Citibank’s contract. What is the outcome of Joe’s suit?
Related questions
Question
- Joe owes Barry 100,000. Joe enters into an agreement with Citibank to borrow 100,000. Joe intends to use the loan proceeds to repay Barry. Citibank has does not know that Joe planned to pay Barry with the proceeds. Citibank agrees to make the loan but Citibank breaches its contract with Joe and does not lend him the money. Joe defaults on his loan to Barry, so Barry sues Citibank because they breached their contract with Joe. Barry argues that he is a third party beneficiary of Joe’s and Citibank’s contract. What is the outcome of Joe’s suit?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps